That's odd that you think we are the exact same species as our ancestors despite having no memory of them
Not as odd as implying that unless we have a memory of ancient people that must have been a different species.
I have no memory of my great grandparents. I guess they were a different species.
No, wait - I am not so idiotic to think such a thing.
and not even being able to understand their language which lacked most of the words of modern language.
I don;t understand Japanese. Do you ever make sensible points?
The lack of understanding is as complete as our lack of understanding of every other species on the planet.
No it isn't.
I made up the term to differentiate us from our predecessors whom biology named Homo Sapiens or "wise people".
Who cares what you made up and why?
As far as I can tell, your entire life is premised on making absurdly egotistical assertions on the internet, never providing supporting evidence (or mangling and misinterpreting what you do), then pretending that you have made these great contributions.
Show us your treatise on who built the pyramids or whatever nonsense you claim about tall that - show us your PUBLISHED papers that provide EVIDENCE for your claims. Show us the scientific society that has endorsed your horse-hockey nonsense about evolution.
You live in a fantasy world.
There are two things that differentiate us; language and the belief we know everything.
Both are false.
The only person I see on these forums that claims to know everything is you and several creationists.
And you and those several creationists are nearly 100% wrong on all of your assertions, yet refuse to acknowledge that YOU do not know everything.
Of course I might be right about the broca's area being a product of modern language too.
Of course you are not. You have the biology backwards.
If I'm correct about our fundamental differences, wouldn't you agree we are a distinct species?
No, because that is not how species is defined in actual biology - in your simple sam's biology, maybe, but not in real life.
And as you never present evidence for anything, only a fool would think you have made any correct claims.
If each individual thinks completely differently and acts differently would or would that not constitute a different species?
No, that is stupid. Your naive biology is laughable.
By your 'logic' we would have to classify those with autism as a different species.
If our differences are so extreme that we don't understand what or why they did things and don't even understand their explanations it seems the differences are more extreme than a brow ridge or a different sized brain.
Only to you, a non-biologist, non-scientist, armchair Dunning-Krugerite.
How far do we have to evolve before we are not the same as pyramid builders?
We can just want to grow a new brain area, according to you.
Still waiting for all the stuff you ignore to save face:
cladking:
Your assumptions are riddled with errors and half facts.
Provide 5 examples of my assumptions. Demonstrate how you know what MY assumptions are, and then demonstrate - using supporting documentation and evidence - that they are, in fact, wrong.
Otherwise this will just be chalked up as Cladking Unsupported Fantasy Assertion (aka lie) #261,
cladking:
The fixed speech center is natural to humans (all animals) and the Broca's area is unique to Homo Omnisciencis because we need a translator between the analog brain and the digital speech center.
Broca's area AND Wernicke's area are "fixed" (though they generally switch hemispheres in left-handed people). The anatomical landmarks of Broca's area are even seen in non-human primates.
There is no such thing as "Homo Omnisciencis" .
Nobody will accept your fantasies as having merit until you present EVIDENCE of the sort that sane, educated, experienced people accept as such. This does NOT include your confident reiterations of unsupported assertions, I am happy to say.
cladking:
Show evidence of a speech center in a newborn.
Right after you show evidence that Homo Omnisciencis occurs outside of your fantasy world. Show evidence that here is a
"bifurcated speech center in the middle of the brain." Show evidence that an infant decides to grow a Broca's area.
You wrote, foolishly:
"I never said "behavior alone causes speciation". I never suggested any such thing. You simply see what you want to see."
Creation and Evolution Compatible...Questions
"Every single time we have observed speciation it happened at a population bottleneck. There is no reason to assume nature, God, happenstance, or any other thing to call reality changes species in another way.
Change is the result of behavior and consciousness and happens suddenly every time we observe it....There is no survival of the fittest.
Behavior drives evolution and not fitness."
What Causes or Motivates the Anti-scientists?
"
Every time we see change in species it is sudden and w
as begotten by the consciousness and behavior of the individuals."
Fascinating!
"Usually this
selection will occur based on "behavior" rather than chance."
Science cannot solve the final mystery
"Many things lead to species change but primarily from what we see
it's caused by behavior."
Argumentum ad populum
"I don't doubt that there is Change in Species. I doubt that it is caused by Evolution.
All empirical and anecdotal evidence shows all changes in life are sudden. There is no such thing as "evolution" and Darwin set us on the wrong path because he believed that populations are stable over the long term and that the forces that caused elimination of individual genes worked through random chance and the adaptability of individuals.
The reality is that genes are eliminated based on behavior"
Still waiting for THAT ^^^^^ evidence, too...
Also still waiting for you to show that Darwin claimed that populations remain stable in the first edition of his book - remember when I linked to a searchable online version of it for you and you ignored it? Wonder why...
Argumentum ad populum
"New "species" arise suddenly from parents which survived a bottleneck
because of their distinctive behavior."
Show me this second motor speech area.
Show me the experimental evidence that behavior alone causes speciation, which is "sudden."
Show me that there is a genetic difference between natural and man-made bottlenecks.
Show me that you actually know what is meant by "survival of the fittest."
Define "peer" as in 'peer review".
Do these things, do not just re-assert the same tired verbiage with no support at all.
My understanding is the natural speech center (wernicks'e area)
Your understanding, as is the norm, is that of a child.
"Natural speech area"? More fabricated concepts/terminology to substitute for your clear ignorance of the subject - so special. Wernicke's is NOT 'the speech area.' It is referred to as the general interpretive area.
Golly - even your
Wernicke's wiki link that you provided to try to rescue your exposed ignorance yet again cuts your legs out from under you:
" It is involved in the comprehension of written and spoken language (in contrast to Broca's area that is involved in the production of language). "
Do you EVER get tired of making a fool of yourself?
does have the same "borders" from one individual to the next (and it is at least partially bifurcated).
Amazing - the lengths you will go to to try to rescue your erroneous notions. Again, YOUR OWN link:
Neuroimaging
suggests the functions earlier attributed to Wernicke's area occur more broadly in the
temporal lobe and indeed happen also in Broca's area.
“ There are some suggestions that middle and inferior temporal gyri and basal temporal cortex reflect lexical processing ... there is consensus that the STG from rostral to caudal fields and the
STS constitute the neural tissue in which many of the critical computations for speech recognition are executed ... aspects of Broca’s area (Brodmann areas 44 and 45) are also regularly implicated in speech processing.
... the range of areas implicated in speech processing go well beyond the classical language areas typically mentioned for speech; the vast majority of textbooks still state that this aspect of perception and language processing occurs in Wernicke’s area (the posterior third of the STG).
[12]”
Curious - do you ever read the entirety of ANYTHING you link to in your own "support"? Given that such is a rarity (you trying to provide external support for your false and dopey claims), I should think that you should have plenty of time to do so.
bi·fur·cate
- divide into two branches or forks.
"just below Cairo the river bifurcates"
So, I will not hold my breath waiting for you to provide evidence that Wernicke's is now "is at least partially bifurcated" as opposed to your previous most-certain and frequently asserted (with no support, of course) position that there is a (unnamed) bifurcated speech center in the' middle of the brain'.
Because Wernicke's is also not in the middle of the brain.
Keep in mind that when I say your biology claims are like those of a child I am not being dismissive or insulting - I am drawing conclusions. The level of knowledge you exhibit on these issues - the incorrect spellings, the off-the-wall depictions and descriptions of location and function, the certainty with which you present totally incorrect claims, your refusal to admit error, etc. - reminds of the way a child acts.