What you actually did was say that your claims are obvious, and if i don't see it, i'll never see it. So great leading, man. You led me to doubt your ability to lead yourself out of a room without walls.
Eve is not my claim nor did I invent it. The story is well known, she came from the bone of a man. That means she could not have been born. The TOE teaches otherwise. ..Regardless of what you either see or think you see.
Yes, science does make the assumption that last thursdayism is probably stupid. I actually give you the benefit of the doubt: Last thursdayism could be true. As could the Matrix. But they sound pretty stupid to me too.
Last week is not being discussed here. Strawman.
Or, we could use science until YOU come up with a way to prove last thursdayism. That sounds a lot better...
You cannot use origin sciences any more than you can use Mother Goose stories. Using actual science of the present world is something we all do. That doesn't get your religion brownie points!
Yes, if you take the bible literally, then embedded age and last thursdayism are just wonderful defence mechanisms to prevent your worldview from crumbling totally.
Strawman. No one is discussing this but you. There are no old old ages, forget embedded ones.
Here's an alternative: Maybe it's not supposed to be taken literally, and maybe your interpretation itself is flawed.
More useless baseless doubts and denial of what is in black and white.
It's because the alternative, last thursdayism(and Christian apologetics in general) sounds really, really far-fetched.
Other beliefs are not the topic. Your religion falsely called science is.
So they go with evidence and assume its age hasn't been tampered by a deceiver god.
The only tampering being done is by your evo beliefs imposed onto evidences.
I don't feel like it, i'm reading your other thread, the recently locked one, in christianforums. In that one you're decrying evidence using the same reasoning you're doing in this post: That the laws of physics were different in the past due to your belief in last thursdayism.
The mods there have enforced ever increasing rules on telling the truth. So I will let them enjoy some catholic rigor mortis for now.
Yes, and unless the rocks contain tampering from a deceiver god, then it's accurate.
Once so called science gets hold of the rocks, then they do encounter tampering by having beliefs sprayed all over them.
If rocks do contain said tampering, then yeah i suppose it's not very accurate. First you have to show that this deceiver god exists.
The patterns of isotopes would only represent long ages IF this present nature had existed the whole time. Science canot prove it did, it has merely assumed and believed so and modeled accordingly. Religion!
Ps. Dad, it has a more appropriate name than last thursdayism. It's a common form of apologetics. But i'm using the more derisive yet equally accurate term to voice the ridiculousness of the entire concept.
Your misconceptions and starkly limited comprehension of my position and even that of your own religion is duly noted.