Science IS religion

[dad]

Meaningless - where's your objective evidence?

anything your religion wants to wave away, such as all written records man has passed down is 'meaningless'. Gong!

But only some Christians deny science, like you do.

Nothing in science to deny. Your beliefs simply need prying off from what is called science with a crowbar!

 

[dad]

And if a model fits all available evidence, is minimal in extra assumptions, and is able to predict the results of new observations, THAT IS ALL THAT IS REQUIRED.

The only reason it fits is because your beliefs are the only thing used on all evidences and then you hammer a fit. The fit is in la la never never land where no one can ever check!

 

[dad]

And just because ancient mystics conjured up tall tales and wrote them on scrolls does not mean that what they wrote is reality-based.

Science can't say...so what..you think we should ask you?

 

[ratiocinator]

anything your religion wants to wave away, such as all written records man has passed down is 'meaningless'. Gong!

I was referring to you saying "experiences and observations of things of a spiritual nature, that have been repeated over all ages" - however, documents from the past have to be assessed. You seem to think we should just blindly accept your favourite book of myths without giving us any evidence. Which, given your demands for evidence from everybody else, makes for astounding double standards.

Do you want us to accept all old books of myths as factually correct? There's a bit of a problem with incompatibility there.

Nothing in science to deny.

This is simply and factually untrue - why do you keep on bearing false witness? It looks like you have no respect for your own religion.

 

[tas8831]

Science can't say...so what..you think we should ask you?

Religion cannot say anything.
I could at least understand the evidence. You? You just make crap up to rescue your middle eastern mysticism.
Go play with some bouncy balls. That is about your level.

 

[dad]

I was referring to you saying "experiences and observations of things of a spiritual nature, that have been repeated over all ages" - however, documents from the past have to be assessed.

Great...so have you some problem assessing history?

You seem to think we should just blindly accept your favourite book of myths without giving us any evidence. Which, given your demands for evidence from everybody else, makes for astounding double standards.

What we accept as a belief is not an issue here. You peddling your favorite evo myths as science is an issue.

Do you want us to accept all old books of myths as factually correct?

I do not accept pagan history as gospel..nor do I wave it all away. There are parts that tell of life and spirits and life spans etc that need to be looked at with less than utter total fanatical denial..just because it doesn't fit your pseudo science.

 

[dad]

Religion cannot say anything.

that has not stopped your origin pseudo science religion from saying stuff day and night!

I could at least understand the evidence.

Too bad you can't post it!!! When you try we get belief smeared nonsense with science lipstick!

 

[dad]

Are you even serious? You are trying to claim that your favourite book of religious myths doesn't need evidence? After your endless demands for objective evidence for science that you then ignored.

Matthew 7:5



Exodus 20:16

Sorry dad, but I just can't take you seriously any more. You're just too comical.

Funny how some people quote the bible who do not believe it.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Funny how some people quote the bible who do not believe it.

The endless failures of the Bible are why we know it is a book of myths. Quoting it only demonstrates that fact.

 

[dad]

The endless failures of the Bible are why we know it is a book of myths. Quoting it only demonstrates that fact.

Your heartfelt opinion is noted.

Psalm 14:1 -The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Your heartfelt opinion is noted.

Psalm 14:1 -The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.

Too bad that you do not understand that verse. It would be equally true if it said ""The fool hath said in his hear, There is a God". Tell me, do you claim that there is a God in your heart?

By the way, since I can support my claims I have much more than an opinion. You on the other hand fail totally in that regard. You daily proclaim that your God is a liar. Why do you do that?

 

[ratiocinator]

Funny how some people quote the bible who do not believe it.

Funny how some people, who claim to believe it, slavishly stick to a particular interpretation of some of its stories, while totally ignoring its clear instructions.

 

[dad]

Too bad that you do not understand that verse. It would be equally true if it said ""The fool hath said in his hear, There is a God". Tell me, do you claim that there is a God in your heart?

By the way, since I can support my claims I have much more than an opinion. You on the other hand fail totally in that regard. You daily proclaim that your God is a liar. Why do you do that?

Not sure what you thought was hard to understand about a simple verse that says a person that actually gets to the point of believing in their inward parts that there is no God is a fool? It is one thing to disagree with a simple verse, but another thing to pretend it is not what it is.

 

[dad]

Funny how some people, who claim to believe it, slavishly stick to a particular interpretation of some of its stories, while totally ignoring its clear instructions.

What instructions are you thinking of? Is there some instruction to disbelieve God created the world and life?

 

[ratiocinator]

What instructions are you thinking of?

Do keep up, it was only two replies ago.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Not sure what you thought was hard to understand about a simple verse that says a person that actually gets to the point of believing in their inward parts that there is no God is a fool? It is one thing to disagree with a simple verse, but another thing to pretend it is not what it is.

dad, I understood it. You did not. And you still have no clue. It is such a shame when people cannot understand their own book of myths.

 

[dad]

Do keep up, it was only two replies ago.

Hiding out then I guess. Shine a light on this instruction set from the bible that OKs disbelief in it!

 

[dad]

dad, I understood it. You did not. And you still have no clue. It is such a shame when people cannot understand their own book of myths.

We get it, you are the authority on God and the bible though you don't so much as believe in either. You also are the authority on science though you cannot post any. Ha

 

[ratiocinator]

Hiding out then I guess. Shine a light on this instruction set from the bible that OKs disbelief in it!

Good grief, no wonder you're so clueless about science if you can't even follow a message board conversation back two or three links!

My post: #1953. Your reply: #1968.

 

[dad]

Good grief, no wonder you're so clueless about science if you can't even follow a message board conversation back two or three links!

My post: #1953. Your reply: #1968.

Quoting from your reply, then we see this..

"Are you even serious? You are trying to claim that your favourite book of religious myths doesn't need evidence? After your endless demands for objective evidence for science that you then ignored."

In case you missed it, science CANNOT cover creation, the spirit world, God or etc. There can be no objective evidence for or against from science! You claiming some is delusional, that is why it cannot be accompanied with factual supportive posts, rather than blather.