sooda you are actually losing this argument so bad I'm tired of looking at it. You're telling me my education is poor about my elders whos education was not scientific who had realy smart minds, in other things... Sothern Biographies said every slavemaster had a backpocket Bible for the page about Ham, said Ham was the African man cursed to serve his brother, which is me being well-educated in something that shouldn't happen and is poorly secularly educated.
First off, Ham had many sons, who supposedly were personification of some tribes of nations, as were the sons of Japheth and of Shem.
Two sons of Ham can be considered to be what you referred to "African" - Mizraim or Egypt and Phut (Libya) - but Canaan is definitely not "African", while Cush is of questionable locations.
Usually, and traditionally, Cush is supposedly the land of Ethiopia, but his grandson Nimrod, was supposedly founder of some Babylonian and Assyrian cities, which are definitely not located in Africa, so some scholars Cush (land) might be located in Iran-Iraq, not in Ethiopia.
Shem descendants, particularly moved to all different locations in the map, but the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were never masters of Egypt or of Babylonia and Assyria. The Egyptians, Babylonians and Assyrians were never slaves to the Israelites, so Genesis prophecy about Ham's descendants being slaves or being African is a phony claim.
In any case, the Flood is a myth, and so are the stories of Noah, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
Lastly, the Americans who bought and kept slaves of black Africans, were never descendants of Shem or of Jacob, so this equating American slave-masters with Shem and African slaves with Ham, is false and quite frankly stupid argument.
