Scientific Falsification of the Theory of Evolution (ToE) and

[MrIntelligentDesign]

What 'hint'
What is an invented prediction ?

Don't you know? Did you go to school and study science?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

It is so easy if you know how things should work in order..

And yet you seem unable to summarize the bullet points here.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

The best way to know if ToE is really understandable is to ask those who were brainwashed (?) people like you about ToE.

The basic principles of evolution aren't exactly rocket science.
However, I don't see how layman's people understanding of any scientific theory affects or impacts anyone else's (your's, in this case) ability to falsify those theories if they can.

 

[MrIntelligentDesign]

You are evading.

It matters because many creationists, including ID creationists:

• don’t have any work experiences in biology-related fields,
• or have no tertiary qualifications (eg masters, PhDs, etc) in the fields,
• OR they have attained fake qualifications from “diploma mill”.

Are you biologist in one many of different fields or related biology fields?

If you are going to talk about fossils, then we should expect you have years of experiences of identifying fossils, and you should have knowledge in biology of extant and extinct organisms, and knowledge in geology-related fields, like mineralogy, stratigraphy, fossilization, etc. Knowledge or experiences in dating rocks or fossils.

Paleontology is a specialised multi-discipline field that most biologists don’t ever study, let alone have field experiences in paleontology.

So, if you say you are a dentists or neurologist or geologist in field of oil mining or lawyer or political journalist or civil engineer or computer programmer, etc, but claiming you are expert in paleontology, then no one here is going to take you seriously.

Did you know one of the founders of Intelligent Design movement, Phillip E Johnson, he was law student and lawyer, with no education in biology beyond high school? And yet claiming expertise in biology and in paleontology.

Michael Behe, whom you have dismissed, do have experiences as biochemistry, but have no field experiences or expertise in paleontology, and yet he want people to accept his debunked Irreducible Complexity paper.

So, yes, MrIntelligentDesign, what fields you have experiences in and what your qualifications, matters.

So stop evading Left Coast’s questions.

It is good that I don't have degree in Biology. Why? If I studied Biology, I will be studying ToE only. TAKE THAT hint.
It is good that I am an outsider but a degree holder in engineering... that is why I will never ask scientists of ToE to build a house.

 

[shunyadragon]

Can you tell me who is the best peer-reviewers of the new discoveries, like intelligence? Is that person better than me? If better than me, what that person had discovered?

The best?? Major universities and their societies and specialty journals in different scientific disciplines such as Biology, genetics and paleontology, and scientific journals such as Nature and Scientific American are examples.

Without any advanced education in the sciences involved with evolution. published research you could not be compared to the scientists in universities and specialty fields with many many years of experience in the science involved with evolution..

Discover? Please explain. Discoveries require 'objective verifiable evidence' that support a hypothesis to justify any scientific claim.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Don't you know? Did you go to school and study science?

Instead of playing this silly evasion game, why don't you just answer the question and answer his request.

What did you mean by "invented" prediction and how does it relate to what he said about the predictions being made by evolution theory?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

WHY do you ask? Is that matter?

Do you even know what evolution actually says?
And I'm not even talking college level here...

I have this feeling that you wouldn't even pass a highschool biology exam on the topic.

 

[MrIntelligentDesign]

The theory of Evolution is already falsifiable.

You keep saying repeatedly “I will falsify ToE”, but Evolution is already testable and have been tested for decades...but I am beginning to suspect that you don’t even know what “falsification” and what “falsifiable” mean.

Repeating the same things, over and over again, without ever falsifying Evolution, only revealing that you don’t know squat.

Do you even understand what “falsification” is?

Please , in your own words -

1. Define what “falsification” is?
2. And explain why new hypotheses and current scientific theories needs to be “falsifiable”?

Please, don’t evade.

Evasions only reveal you are not being intellectually honest with us.

maybe you do not know falsification... ARE all invented falsification criteria of ToE part of reality?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

But the peer-reviewers are probably more stupid than you, that is why I will be rejected..

Here we go with the conspiracy drivel...
That didn't take long.

 

[MrIntelligentDesign]

Instead of playing this silly evasion game, why don't you just answer the question and answer his request.

What did you mean by "invented" prediction and how does it relate to what he said about the predictions being made by evolution theory?

lol! anybody could invent prediction!

 

[shunyadragon]

It is good that I don't have degree in Biology. Why? If I studied Biology, I will be studying ToE only. TAKE THAT hint.
It is good that I am an outsider but a degree holder in engineering... that is why I will never ask scientists of ToE to build a house.

. . . and I would never ask an engineer to falsify a hypothesis concerning the science of evolution, Engineering represents 'applied physical science, and NOT the basic sciences for evolution such as paleontology, genetics, geology.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

If the supporters of ToE will fight fair and square in science, I will surely win...

Aside from all the bluster and talking yourself up, you have yet to say a single word pertaining to what you claim you can demonstrate.

 

[MrIntelligentDesign]

Do you even know what evolution actually says?
And I'm not even talking college level here...

I have this feeling that you wouldn't even pass a highschool biology exam on the topic.

I know Evolution, maybe you don't really know your supported theory.

 

[MrIntelligentDesign]

. . . and I would never ask an engineer to falsify a hypothesis concerning the science of evolution, Engineering represents 'applied physical science, and NIOT the basic sciences for evolution such as paleontology, genetics, geology.

But any engineer who knows structural strength and weaknesses could know if the biological structures are designed or not... unless they wanted to be brainwashed... but for me, I discovered intelligence and have degree of engineering, so, better than anybody else...

 

[MrIntelligentDesign]

Aside from all the bluster and talking yourself up, you have yet to say a single word pertaining to what you claim you can demonstrate.

This is a good starter if you want to know me well: The New Intelligent Design and Its Powerful Correct Scientific Explanations.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

OK, here's a question: what was in place before the socalled "big bang"? This involves eventually the theory of evolution.

No, it doesn't.

So what elements were in place before the "big bang"?

"before" the big bang, isn't even a sensible proposition.
It's like asking where we can find married bachelors.
The question itself is invalid.

 

[Revoltingest]

It is good that I am....a degree holder in engineering...

Only one?

 

[MrIntelligentDesign]

The basic principles of evolution aren't exactly rocket science.
However, I don't see how layman's people understanding of any scientific theory affects or impacts anyone else's (your's, in this case) ability to falsify those theories if they can.

If the theory like Gravity is part of reality, even a laymen understand that theory. But if the theory is invented like fable, then, laymen cannot falsify it.

 

[MrIntelligentDesign]

Incredibly arrogant and vacuous.

I am just telling the truth...

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

It is good that I don't have degree in Biology. Why? If I studied Biology, I will be studying ToE only. TAKE THAT hint.

What hint? That you are so arrogant to think that you understand a field in which you have zero experience and education better then those who have dedicated their lives to studying said fields?

that is why I will never ask scientists of ToE to build a house.

Right.

I don't ask my car mechanic to make me sandwich.
I don't ask my doctor to fix my car.
I don't ask a biologist about quantum gravity.
And I won't be asking an engineer about biology.