• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Scriptural Prophecies

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
To insinuate that a certain religion is better because it's literature can predict the future. Not a convincing argument, in my opinion, as ther's really no proof. Take Bahai for instance. They interpret scripture and find so called 'prophecy' to say that they all predicted the coming of their particular prophet. So that's the agenda. In my view, there are far better ways to evaluate the legitimacy of a faith.
There are indeed far better ways for a faith to justify the legitimacy of a faith, and the Baha'i Faith does that. There is far more to the Baha'i Faith then prophecy, and there are far more prophecies from many faiths around the world through history related to the Baha'i including the prophetic vision of the Baha'i Faith for the transformation of the world since the 1840's.

The only value I see in prophecy is in a more universal context of the spiritual evolution of humanity, and not the wide range of personal interpretations to justify one ancient religion over the other.
 

Faithofchristian

Well-Known Member
There are indeed far better ways for a faith to justify the legitimacy of a faith, and the Baha'i Faith does that. There is far more to the Baha'i Faith then prophecy, and there are far more prophecies from many faiths around the world through history related to the Baha'i including the prophetic vision of the Baha'i Faith for the transformation of the world since the 1840's.

The only value I see in prophecy is in a more universal context of the spiritual evolution of humanity, and not the wide range of personal interpretations to justify one ancient religion over the other.

Maybe you should understand, that Christians do not follow nor go by Baha'i,

As a Christian I follow Christ Jesus and His teachings.
Therefore as Christians we follow our God of the bible.
Maybe that's too hard for you to understand, but that's how it is.
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
Carlita,
One great thing that has happened in history, the Bible has been tried to be destroyed over and over again, but the God of the Bible said that He would protect His words from all generations, Psalms 12:6,7. If the message from God was corrupted, it would not be God’s words, Isaiah 40:8, 1Peter 1:25. Many religious leaders in history have tried to keep the Bible in a dead language, such as Latin, and tried to keep the Bible from the hands of the common people, so that the religious leaders could put their own explanation as to what it said. They all failed, because money were ready to put their own lives at stake to translate the Bible in hundreds of languages over the years, and many were tortured and killed, but the word of God kept spreading, with no one being able to stop it.
As for Prophecies, the Bible has many, and it you stop to really think about that, you will understand that it is impossible for for ant man to know what will happen the next day, much less days or even many years, as many prophecies in the Bible do.
Some of the greatest prophecies recorded are in Daniel, in fact most of Daniel is prophecy. First, consider the prophecy recorded at Daniel 9:24-27. This was about the exact time that the long awaited Messiah, Christ would come. This prophecy spaned a period of 490 years. This is taking the Seventy Weeks as years, there are 7 days in a week, so 7X 70=490. This was a prophecy that the Jews understood, and they were in expectation of the Messiah, Luke 3:15. That is why, when John the Baptist came 6 months before Jesus came, they thought John the Baptist was the Messiah, Luke 3:15-17. This prophecy told about the coming of the Messiah, about him being killed in the middle of the week and about the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple that represented the the place that God blessed. Because of the Jews leaving God He allowed them to be destroyed, but He saved
a Remnant, the people who obeyed Him, as He always will.
There is another prophecy that is extremely important, the prophecy that fortold the asecond coming of Jesus, and just before he comes to earth he would be given The Crown, of The Kingdom of God. This prophecy was mentioned several times, but the prophecy in Daniel actually gives the date of Jesus getting that Crown. The time period was 2,520 years, recorded at Daniel 4:10-37. This prophecy had a small fulfillment on Nebuchadnezzar, the King of Babylon, and a greater fulfillment on Jesus and the Kingdom of God. Nebuchadnezzar destroyed Jerusalem and the great Temple that Solomon had built. That was symbolized by the great Tree being cut down and banded. The Tree represented the Theocracy on earth at that time, which stopped in 607BCE. The end of that prophecy was 1914, when Jesus received his Crown in heaven, to rule in the midst of his enemies for a short while, Revelation 6:2, Psalms 110:1-6. Notice what would happen at the time Jesus became King, War in Heaven first, Revelation 12:7-9. The verses 12:1-6 seams about the birth of the Kingdom. The verses 12:10-12 tells us what happened after Satan was thrown down to earth, Woes from then on until Jesus comes to earth to Judge the earth at Armageddon, Revelation 16:12-16, speaks in symbols about the kingdoms of the earth fighting against the King of God’s Kingdom at Armageddon, also mentioned at Revelation 1911-21, which is actually Armageddon, The Judgment of the world by Jesus, Acts 17:31, Matthew 25:31-46.
Many prophecies were not understood until they were being fulfilled, or fulfilled. Then they are easy for a person who understands the. Bible.
Another remarkable prophecy concerspns Cyrus the Great, who God used to conquer Babylon and let His people loose from captivity and return home to Jerusalem. this prophecy mentioning Cyrus was written over a hundred years before Cyrus was born, even mentioning his name, and even telling how he would conquer Babylon, who, because of its great walls, and metal gates, and rivers diverted around it, people thought it was impossible to conquer, Isaiah 44:24-28, 45:1-6.
There are so many prophecies, it would take the Bible to record them all, but they are probably the most proof of God authoring the Holy Bible, because no one else could write these things before they happened, and cause them to happen, just as prophesied.
There are many more proofs, such as the order of creation, which even scientists are accurate.
Many thing written in the Bible were not known by ang human, at the time of writing, and some things not known for centuries, Job 26:7,10, Isaiah 40:22. In the Mosaic Law Covenant there were written many laws about hygiene that no one knew about, but that saved the lives of many of the Jews. There were laws about what not to eat, one being pork, which would have killed many if they had eatened this meat in the climate they lived in, with no refrigeration.
There are so many things in the Bible that point to a superior mind and Almighty Power, that only God could do.
One thing ai like to repeat; mathematicians say that the odds of things just happening as they are today, is 1= to all the atoms in the known universe. Anything happening with odds more than 40,000 to 1 is considered, impossible!!!

The thing is, I dont see truth in scripture. The more I learn about it from an objective view (fact validity not swayed one way or another), the more I see the prophecies and "supernatural" things attributed from a book is believed by the eye of the beholder.

The Church put the bible together. I cant see christianity existing without The Church. I know later on people started disagreeing with The Church's laws but that doesnt change they are part of the bibles creation. If not, christians would not be worshiping christ but his father.

I would need to pick apart all you wrote, but one thing jumped out. Armegeddon. What history (factual not spiritual) leads me to and historians to know there will be an amegeddon based on other points of history and evidence today outside of the bible?

How does "the order" of creation lead to the christian god?

I understand somewhat saying a creator but not a specific one.
 
Last edited:

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
One great thing that has happened in history, the Bible has been tried to be destroyed over and over again, but the God of the Bible said that He would protect His words from all generations, Psalms 12:6,7. If the message from God was corrupted, it would not be God’s words, Isaiah 40:8, 1Peter 1:25.

The bible is Hebrew scriptures. Everything pass that are from The Church (christs apostles) not specifically christ nor his father. The creator shouldnt be defined and kept "safe" by an existing book. The book can be destroyed.

Where in history is there a line of god, a specific one, that cant exist without the physical NT bible?

Many religious leaders in history have tried to keep the Bible in a dead language, such as Latin, and tried to keep the Bible from the hands of the common people, so that the religious leaders could put their own explanation as to what it said. They all failed, because money were ready to put their own lives at stake to translate the Bible in hundreds of languages over the years, and many were tortured and killed, but the word of God kept spreading, with no one being able to stop it.

As for Prophecies, the Bible has many, and it you stop to really think about that, you will understand that it is impossible for for ant man to know what will happen the next day, much less days or even many years, as many prophecies in the Bible do.

Latin isnt a dead language. It was originally in part in latin. If you want the truth of something you find it in its original form not the translation and oral transmission of it: this involves church tradition and politics of the day.

They didnt fail. Over here they are starting to have more Latin Masses. I went to a Latin Mass and was beyond belief what christians believe. All. Protestants too. You all in the same boat regardless how you modernize it from catholic views.

Some of the greatest prophecies recorded are in Daniel, in fact most of Daniel is prophecy. First, consider the prophecy recorded at Daniel 9:24-27. This was about the exact time that the long awaited Messiah, Christ would come. This prophecy spaned a period of 490 years. This is taking the Seventy Weeks as years, there are 7 days in a week, so 7X 70=490. This was a prophecy that the Jews understood, and they were in expectation of the Messiah, Luke 3:15. That is why, when John the Baptist came 6 months before Jesus came, they thought John the Baptist was the Messiah, Luke 3:15-17. T

Whats the prophecy of Daniel outside of scripture, that we can observe today without reference to the bible supporting itself accurate?

This prophecy told about the coming of the Messiah, about him being killed in the middle of the week and about the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple that represented the the place that God blessed. Because of the Jews leaving God He allowed them to be destroyed, but He saved
a Remnant, the people who obeyed Him, as He always wil

Thats a biblical prophecy not a historical one

There is another prophecy that is extremely important, the prophecy that fortold the asecond coming of Jesus, and just before he comes to earth he would be given The Crown, of The Kingdom of God. This prophecy was mentioned several times, but the prophecy in Daniel actually gives the date of Jesus getting that Crown. The time period was 2,520 years, recorded at Daniel 4:10-37. Th

Whete is this in history?

Facts are not bias to spiritual interpretations. It just is.

This prophecy had a small fulfillment on Nebuchadnezzar, the King of Babylon, and a greater fulfillment on Jesus and the Kingdom of God. Nebuchadnezzar destroyed Jerusalem and the great Temple that Solomon had built. That was symbolized by the great Tree being cut down and banded. The Tree represented the Theocracy on earth at that time, which stopped in 607BCE. The end of that prophecy was 1914, when Jesus received his Crown in heaven, to rule in the midst of his enemies for a short while, Revelation 6:2, Psalms 110:1-6. Notice what would happen at the time Jesus became King, War in Heaven first, Revelation 12:7-9. The verses 12:1-6 seams about the birth of the Kingdom.

The great tree?

Oh. You dont have to quote scripture. Im not looking up scripture. Im not christian so I dont need to try and varify your beliefs. Im taking word for it. Thats all christian actions.

The verses 12:10-12 tells us what happened after Satan was thrown down to earth, Woes from then on until Jesus comes to earth to Judge the earth at Armageddon, Revelation 16:12-16, speaks in symbols about the kingdoms of the earth fighting against the King of God’s Kingdom at Armageddon, also mentioned at Revelation 1911-21, which is actually Armageddon, The Judgment of the world by Jesus, Acts 17:31, Matthew 25:31-46.

History? Where is satan as an actual being in histort to where we know it today as a fact not what people believe as such?

Many prophecies were not understood until they were being fulfilled, or fulfilled. Then they are easy for a person who understands the. Bible.

Outside of the bible, which prophecies were fulfilled?

Greeks -> Ephesians > Romans in scripture parallels and is part of historical events during that time perios in I think Mid eastern Italy. They correlate events that happened (past tense). We see evidence here in the states by our taking arts from our parents and grandparents and putting then to our archetecture. Sport games and language itself is reflected from The Church and its culture and tradition. Its no new age as protestants see it, the non liturgical ones, its a direct interwove history.

Anything we see today are not prophecies, but just historical events "catching up" with us. We cant modernize everything.

Which prophecies have been fulfilled in history without needing a spiritual component and belief to influence the interpretation rater than the events standing on their own validity?
Another remarkable prophecy concerspns Cyrus the Great, who God used to conquer Babylon and let His people loose from captivity and return home to Jerusalem. this prophecy mentioning Cyrus was written over a hundred years before Cyrus was born, even mentioning his name, and even telling how he would conquer Babylon, who, because of its great walls, and metal gates, and rivers diverted around it, people thought it was impossible to conquer, Isaiah 44:24-28, 45:1-6.

You keep saying god did this. Where in history does it say god had has anything to do with historical events?

Thats like saying that when the pantheon was built for Athena, when we go there, Athena guides us to worship her and the gods in the pantheon. There are alot of gods in history and made it in history and by many religions practiced today, are a continuation of these practices from yesterday until now. Christianity is no different.

Can prophecies be spotted in history without placing god in it for it to be fulfilled?[/QUOTE]
 

Phantasman

Well-Known Member
Would it have been if we didn't want people who wanted an Israel to speed up the end of the world?


To be fair, though, Israel isn't exactly the Poster Child for civil rights.

You would think a population that either experienced or knew someone who experienced wanton genocide wouldn't be so mean to the "alien" who lives with them.

Hell, their own fundamentalists try to destroy "regular" Jews, so it's not just a Jewish thing. They are trying desperately to return to a fantasy Golden Age where they got their strict theocracy and the government couldn't last more than a few decades at best.


You act like Israel is just some poor helpless damsel in distress in the desert. They have a way bigger body count than the Palestinians AND they have nukes as well. They are trying to wipe non Jews off the map and even Jews if they don't kowtow to their fundamentalists.


I actually preferred not being ruled by toxic masculinity that thinks the solution to everything is a nuclear peeing contest.


I'm a precognitive. This isn't true.

'AND IT SHALL BE IN THE LAST DAYS,' God says, 'THAT I WILL POUR FORTH OF MY SPIRIT ON ALL MANKIND; AND YOUR SONS AND YOUR DAUGHTERS SHALL PROPHESY, AND YOUR YOUNG MEN SHALL SEE VISIONS, AND YOUR OLD MEN SHALL DREAM DREAMS;

That means someone still has to have gifts, right?


So Jesus never foretold anything after John's execution?

All the prophecies supposedly made after that execution were false, even though they're in the bible?

Kind of. Spiritual wisdom allowed Christ to see where paths led. He spoke where the physical was leading and where the spiritual path led. He never defined a time specific, but the events leading up to them. The paths are not preordained, just inevitable.

He saw the path of the Jews to foretell the Jewish revolt (70AD) that many see as an end to mankind, Revelations was written to the Christians under persecution by Domitan. It was this vision of impending doom that gave the righteous the strength they needed to see the antichrist and their eventual demise. Of course, unless you believe the orthodox, who use it as a carrot and stick.

Paul tells us that prophesy's will wind up failing.

1 Corinthians 13:
6 Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth;

7 Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things.

8 Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.

9 For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.

10 But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.

We have a watered down version of the Spirit that Christ spoke, as an example. Same Spirit, with a lot of darkness added over the centuries. Eventually, the Spirit will be so weak as man turns more to physical (truths). In the end, the world will overcome.

Matthew:
23 Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.

24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.

25 Behold, I have told you before.

This started during Pauls time.
Galatians:
6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:

7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.

8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.

9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

John talked of it decades later:
1 John 4:
2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:

3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.

4 Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.

5 They are of the world: therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them.

6 We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.

See it. It's not saying that Christ walked as flesh, but the Christ comes into YOUR flesh. Christ in you, makes you Christ(ian), a son (daughter) of God. Without it inside of you, you are antichrist,

John 1:
11 He came unto his own, and his own (Jews) received him not.

12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:

13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

It's as much as I can give, without delving into the non canon gospels, to show that the Jews way, which rejected Christ, is darkness of truth trying to define Christ which IS truth. The "other" gospels align with the canon gospels and Paul, and bring them from darkness to light. Marcion and Valentinus had a following that grew as large as the catholic. They didn't teach flesh (circumcision, diets, etc.). It grew, till the catholic ideology became Romes church, and resorted to murder, banishment, etc. to eliminate any viewpoint other than theirs. Same as the Pharisee's and Saducees's did to Jesus.

To see it, read Galatians 2, and the Incident at Antioch. Catholic is Peters path. Gnosis is Pauls.

Incident at Antioch - Wikipedia

You will see both sides of the coin and decide, rather than the one side the orthodox tout.
 

Phantasman

Well-Known Member
Interesting. Thank you.

How did the context change being ita thebsame wordnwith two different definition. One fortelling the future and the other sharing the gospel after prophecies stopped?he Jews are still living by prophesies. They see their Messiah as one who will bring total peace through the power of God, for Earth to be as heaven. And for Israel to be the blessed people (and land) of the Earth over all. They will have no enemies. At least that's the way I see it. A recreation of Eden for all.

To me, Eden was a prison. Just as the flesh is a prison.

They never believed in the truth of what the spirit is, because they never had the Spirit (capital S)

John:
63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.

64 But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him.

Jesus spoke by the Spirit, and knew that the Jews never had it. He also knew they (leaders) would betray him (crucify him) from their beliefs.
 

Phantasman

Well-Known Member
The bible is Hebrew scriptures. Everything pass that are from The Church (christs apostles) not specifically christ nor his father. The creator shouldnt be defined and kept "safe" by an existing book. The book can be destroyed.

Where in history is there a line of god, a specific one, that cant exist without the physical NT bible?



Latin isnt a dead language. It was originally in part in latin. If you want the truth of something you find it in its original form not the translation and oral transmission of it: this involves church tradition and politics of the day.

They didnt fail. Over here they are starting to have more Latin Masses. I went to a Latin Mass and was beyond belief what christians believe. All. Protestants too. You all in the same boat regardless how you modernize it from catholic views.



Whats the prophecy of Daniel outside of scripture, that we can observe today without reference to the bible supporting itself accurate?



Thats a biblical prophecy not a historical one



Whete is this in history?

Facts are not bias to spiritual interpretations. It just is.



The great tree?

Oh. You dont have to quote scripture. Im not looking up scripture. Im not christian so I dont need to try and varify your beliefs. Im taking word for it. Thats all christian actions.



History? Where is satan as an actual being in histort to where we know it today as a fact not what people believe as such?



Outside of the bible, which prophecies were fulfilled?

Greeks -> Ephesians > Romans in scripture parallels and is part of historical events during that time perios in I think Mid eastern Italy. They correlate events that happened (past tense). We see evidence here in the states by our taking arts from our parents and grandparents and putting then to our archetecture. Sport games and language itself is reflected from The Church and its culture and tradition. Its no new age as protestants see it, the non liturgical ones, its a direct interwove history.

Anything we see today are not prophecies, but just historical events "catching up" with us. We cant modernize everything.

Which prophecies have been fulfilled in history without needing a spiritual component and belief to influence the interpretation rater than the events standing on their own validity?


You keep saying god did this. Where in history does it say god had has anything to do with historical events?

Thats like saying that when the pantheon was built for Athena, when we go there, Athena guides us to worship her and the gods in the pantheon. There are alot of gods in history and made it in history and by many religions practiced today, are a continuation of these practices from yesterday until now. Christianity is no different.

Can prophecies be spotted in history without placing god in it for it to be fulfilled?
[/QUOTE]

I agree with your insight on Biblical views. I believe the early church fathers want us to see God as they did. And created that system by Earthly power rather than spiritual wisdom. As expansive as I believe God (the Father) is, the Bible does injustice that everything he is is contained in such a small "book" (by comparison). The word of God (Gospel) is a seed. Luke 8:11

I can see the gospel as a seed, but what it grows into cannot even fit into a book.

25 And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written.- John

The church fathers gave us little (of Christ), and make us seek them to fill in the rest. There is still plenty out there from early Christianity to dispute their glorious church facade.

Just my view.
 

QuestioningMind

Well-Known Member
What, in relation to history, that convinces you as a christian that the fulfilled prophecies in the bible are connected to the god you believe in without the validity of the bible to confirm the prophecies written?

What prophecies have been fulfilled? Please be specific. Nichiren Diashonin has prophecies when he was imprisoned in Japan. During the Japanese war, he said he knew that the different Buddhist schools will separate and monks will loose their truth to speak of The Dharma. Interestingly enough, though vague, we have many more modern temples that drop a lot of the cultural necessities of the religion in favor for the basics and up-to-date version. So, The dharma (lowercase) is slowly becoming lost. While this is an accurate prediction it is too vague to consider it a divine prophecy. Even so, the prophecy is not mere the point but without without, what it teaches. So, what makes it important is not the prophecy and fulfillment but the actual message of The Dharma that's been transmitted (and hopefully not lost) from teacher to disciple.

What, in relation to history, that convinces you as a christian that the fulfilled prophecies in the bible are connected to the god you believe in without the validity of the bible to confirm the prophecies written?

What prophecies have been fulfilled?

If there were no prophecies fulfilled and no history that talks about god, would you know god?

I have yet to read a prophecy that wasn't either so vague that it could mean virtually anything or no different from an accurate prediction.
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
I have yet to read a prophecy that wasn't either so vague that it could mean virtually anything or no different from an accurate prediction.

In Nichirens writings? In his letters, The Gosho, to his disciples he spoke mostly of The Lotus Sutra and how his disciples where very helpful in bringing him food and clothing while in prision. He had visions of buddhist priests who did not adhere to The Lotus to loose the real meaning of The Dharma. There are sooo many Buddhist sects that to say his view is wrong would be overstating a false opinion. Its vague because it he does not go into specifics in how the priests would specifically lose the meaning of The Dharma. His goal was to spread Thr Lotus not go over the validity of The Dharma. Its a done deal. No debates in his mind.

Christians have been debating for years. Was just finished reading about The Book of Kells, Lindisfarne Gospels, that weirdly enough is not in the bible. The pages "illustrates potayals of the Virgin Mary and of Christ, NT narratives" and so forth. Very interesting art. Pages of decorative roman letters speaking the gospels in art since people were illerate.

But its vague in that there is no connection between whats written about god rather than from god. I mean, John wrote from his visions not facts. Also, John was the only one who witnessed christ crucifiction.

A lot of specifics in history not so much in connecting prophecy if any so far.

Where in history are there any prophecies that connect to different events during and after the roman empire and Medieval ages?

Its nothing spiritual. God isnt in history thats all believers views. If believers experiences, visions, and opinions are fact, we should be able to see it without interpretation.
 
Last edited:

loverofhumanity

We are all the leaves of one tree
Premium Member
What, in relation to history, that convinces you as a christian that the fulfilled prophecies in the bible are connected to the god you believe in without the validity of the bible to confirm the prophecies written?

What prophecies have been fulfilled? Please be specific. Nichiren Diashonin has prophecies when he was imprisoned in Japan. During the Japanese war, he said he knew that the different Buddhist schools will separate and monks will loose their truth to speak of The Dharma. Interestingly enough, though vague, we have many more modern temples that drop a lot of the cultural necessities of the religion in favor for the basics and up-to-date version. So, The dharma (lowercase) is slowly becoming lost. While this is an accurate prediction it is too vague to consider it a divine prophecy. Even so, the prophecy is not mere the point but without without, what it teaches. So, what makes it important is not the prophecy and fulfillment but the actual message of The Dharma that's been transmitted (and hopefully not lost) from teacher to disciple.

What, in relation to history, that convinces you as a christian that the fulfilled prophecies in the bible are connected to the god you believe in without the validity of the bible to confirm the prophecies written?

What prophecies have been fulfilled?

If there were no prophecies fulfilled and no history that talks about god, would you know god?

Hi Carlita. Miss you a lot. Hope you’re doing fine.
 

loverofhumanity

We are all the leaves of one tree
Premium Member
The Christians will refer to over 300 verses in the OT they believe relates to Christ.

Here's a few to get us started:

Jesus' name will be 'Immanuel'. Matthew 1:22-3, Isaiah 7:14

'Out of Egypt I called my son'. Mt 2:18. Hos 11:1

A ruler will come from Bethlehem. Mt 2:6, Mic 5.2

The massacre of the innocents. Mt 2:18, Jer 31:15

Beyond the Jordan, the people who sat in darkness saw a great light. Mt 4:15, Isa 9:1-2

He Himself took our infirmities/ and bore our sicknesses. Mt 8:17, Isa 53:4

Prophetic praise of Jesus, His character and ministry to the Gentiles. Mt 12:18-21, Isa 42:1-4

He will speak in parables. Mt 13:35, Ps 78:2

The Messiah will enter Jerusalem on a donkey. Mt 21:4-5, Zech 9:9

Hi Adrian. Happy Naw-Ruz!
 

Kelly of the Phoenix

Well-Known Member
The Christians will refer to over 300 verses in the OT they believe relates to Christ.

Here's a few to get us started:

Jesus' name will be 'Immanuel'. Matthew 1:22-3, Isaiah 7:14
But he wasn't.

'Out of Egypt I called my son'. Mt 2:18. Hos 11:1
Yes, Egypt was a few days' walk and a common refugee site.

A ruler will come from Bethlehem. Mt 2:6, Mic 5.2
That's why he's called the Nazarene, right?

The massacre of the innocents. Mt 2:18, Jer 31:15
Romans liked bloodshed.

Beyond the Jordan, the people who sat in darkness saw a great light. Mt 4:15, Isa 9:1-2
Oh, look, maybe someone read Plato.

He Himself took our infirmities/ and bore our sicknesses. Mt 8:17, Isa 53:4
I never see him developing the illnesses of those he healed, though I have watched sci fi where that happens.

Prophetic praise of Jesus, His character and ministry to the Gentiles. Mt 12:18-21, Isa 42:1-4
Prophetic praise of Jesus?

He will speak in parables. Mt 13:35, Ps 78:2
Most of the bible talks in parables.

The Messiah will enter Jerusalem on a donkey. Mt 21:4-5, Zech 9:9
As opposed to a Lexus?

History is written by the victors, and is not always accurate.
Very wise words. I imagine you apply that to the bible as well.

He saw the path of the Jews to foretell the Jewish revolt (70AD) that many see as an end to mankind, Revelations was written to the Christians under persecution by Domitan.
For one thing, the books were written after the riot, so it's hindsight. Second, you don't have to be a psychic to know that the Romans, who got their empire by doing unspeakable things to people, will be more than happy to do unspeakable things to you if you annoy them enough.

but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail
Including his?
 
Last edited:

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
I agree with your insight on Biblical views. I believe the early church fathers want us to see God as they did. And created that system by Earthly power rather than spiritual wisdom. As expansive as I believe God (the Father) is, the Bible does injustice that everything he is is contained in such a small "book" (by comparison). The word of God (Gospel) is a seed. Luke 8:11

I can see the gospel as a seed, but what it grows into cannot even fit into a book.

25 And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written.- John

The church fathers gave us little (of Christ), and make us seek them to fill in the rest. There is still plenty out there from early Christianity to dispute their glorious church facade.

Just my view.

What sparks my interest is that the bible isnt That old. In other words, its not old as in the paleoethic period. Not even old during the polytheism days of Europe. I mean, when when I think or old, I think died out history. The Roman Catholic Church still stands so a lot of what christians believe are very modern. Especially compared to the Torah.

On that note, unless age is not an issue, I dont see how god can talk to people and give clear visions to people in the current era but then in the last what hundred of years aso, god started not talking. It could be the rest of us are looking into (and can live to do so) beliefs in god as it affects the politics of yesterday and today. The "first" influencial atheists, I guess you can say. In the US they can get away with it. Other countries not so much.

I undestand and belief in god. Once you add the bible or any religious book or item and treat it as god (bible, Eucharist, etc) from and as god himself, I lift a eyebrow. The latter I understand it but not so far aa worship. The former, I see no reason how the bible is the source of divine expression.

Anyway, thats my soapbox lecture...
 
Last edited:

loverofhumanity

We are all the leaves of one tree
Premium Member
Yep. Doing well. Still here. How's it over there?

It’s getting cooler heading towards winter. I wish I could invite you over. My wife made a delicious lamb curry and everyone had third helpings. Always remember I consider you a beautiful person and you are always welcome in my home.
 

loverofhumanity

We are all the leaves of one tree
Premium Member
To insinuate that a certain religion is better because it's literature can predict the future. Not a convincing argument, in my opinion, as ther's really no proof. Take Bahai for instance. They interpret scripture and find so called 'prophecy' to say that they all predicted the coming of their particular prophet. So that's the agenda. In my view, there are far better ways to evaluate the legitimacy of a faith.

Hi Vinayaka. Good to see.
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
It’s getting cooler heading towards winter. I wish I could invite you over. My wife made a delicious lamb curry and everyone had third helpings. Always remember I consider you a beautiful person and you are always welcome in my home.

Hmm. Lamb curry. I think I had chicken curry at our Vietnamese temple. It was a sticky purplelike rice if that sounds at all familar. Ha. Not a food person. You know we two days or snow in tue beginning of spring!

Thank you for the invite. Wait until I get some real furniture then Id invite people over when they have good places to sit. My friend keeps telling me to fix up my place. I tell her: you got fix-up-your-place money? All in good humor.
 

Dawnofhope

Non-Proselytizing Baha'i
Staff member
Premium Member
Its history and appreciation of art. Goes into a lot of prehisoric history. Great class. A lot of memorization involved.

The study of art is an excellent way to learn about history. History can be a very dry topic and study of the arts can bring it to life.

What are you having to memorize?

Somewhat. If there are so many prophecies it should be one of the highlights of history. It doesnt need to be religious and spiritual just documented the correlations between one source and another. We go through belief in gods since its very important in the meaning behind the arts in that time period. Anything "supernatural" is in the eye of the beholder. A christian my confirm his belief because history says John and Paul were real people. Others see them as real people but they influnce late Romes politics more so than religion.

History is very important. One confirmation bias, interestingly enough, is the word His Story implying the word was referring to jesus story. Dont know the history of the word but His could be anyone.

Much of the history of Western Art and Civilisation is tied into Christianity.

I suppose themes of Armageddon and the return of Christ have been a great inspiration over the centuries.



There is a lot of correlation between bible and history. The Ephesians are an example and corinthians (corinthians art such as temples columns compared to doric and ionic). Trying to remember the events in Ephesians. Our next chapter is on the apostle John, and Paul I think.

If supernatual influenced facts that we can look up, then we would have record that events such as the passage you quoted and the Roman Temple one would not just have a historical relation but if there was a spiritual significance, we should be able to see that too.

Supernatual, if real, doesnt need to mystical. If its part of history, a lot of religious history not just abrahamic, it should show itself. Historians would have a field day.

The supernatural language such as lightening from East to West is symbolic rather than literal.



Yep. After I stopped practicing christianity, I didnt have the them vs. me truth anymore that I see in all abrahamic religions. Breathe of fresh air.

Of course the 'us verses them' beliefs of the Christians have nothing to do with the Teachings of Christ.
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
The study of art is an excellent way to learn about history. History can be a very dry topic and study of the arts can bring it to life.

What are you having to memorize?

Right now we're memorizing a lot of christian art from the Early Roman Empire, Late Empire, we started on the Medieval Period. A lot of facts. Here is an example (attached)

Interesting that before the Church, jesus was pictured more humble. When The Romans started making their art, they changed jesus to look more judging. What's interesting is that some christians today see jesus as judging the living and the dead. I keep thinking that history is behind us; it isn't.

Much of the history of Western Art and Civilisation is tied into Christianity.

I suppose themes of Armageddon and the return of Christ have been a great inspiration over the centuries.

Pretty much. The history we're looking at is not spiritual. If anything, in how I see the world, it's very immoral. I don't see love in christianity. That's probably something that gain interest over time to modern day. I'm sure the Romans didn't feel the same about the love we speak of today. I don't know how the Jews define the word in relation to god.

The supernatural language such as lightening from East to West is symbolic rather than literal.

Um. Some things are literal others are not. Those that are not in that day was considered literal. Mythology such as the pantheon dedicated to Athena and all the gods were not symbolic. Just as today, there are religious who believe in multiple gods who do very interesting things you'd think they believe its symbolism; they do not. Hard to wrap my head around; but, since I don't follow any of these beliefs, it's easier to say "that's what they believe" and leave it be.

Of course the 'us verses them' beliefs of the Christians have nothing to do with the Teachings of Christ.

It is a christian thing all throughout the bible. There is no reason to save "his chosen people" if he felt all people were in the same boat. There'd be no special people. No "Jews" in the religious sense of the word. I use that because that's what Jesus taught. If there was no me vs. them (to me it's a moral issue; it's not bad in and of itself) there'd be no reason to save people. Divinity would not have religions. No manifestations vs. humans. No prophets vs. pagans. No need to teach the good gospel to those who have not heard. No need to be a disciple of Baha'ullah rather than a Hindu or a Pagan if all were on one level and there wasn't a code of morality in Christianity and other faiths.

It's not attractive to me, though. Doesn't mean its wrong in and of itself. I can't learn from separating myself from humanity as "these of man" type of thing. No prophets. No manifestation. All egalitarian.
 

Attachments

  • beforechurch.jpg
    beforechurch.jpg
    50.5 KB · Views: 0
  • duringchurch.jpg
    duringchurch.jpg
    14.7 KB · Views: 0
Top