This is a breakout from another thread, so as not to pollute the topic there...
Link to original : http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/religious-debates/155772-list-things-you-would-find-wrong-4.html#post3546773
Basically, the subject of secular happiness (or lack thereof) was raised. The following post is the one I'll respond to...
Yup, I understand. That's why I mentioned 'calm'. I'm not a guy who experiences highs and lows, to any great degree. I'm described as laid-back and easygoing, and take the good with the bad.
This is a very monotheistic view of death. One thing we would agree with is that neither of us thinks our opinion changes the truth of the matter. There is a god or there's not, regardless of what we believe. So, for me, I don't ask myself why someone was taken, try to convince myself they are in a better place, wonder about their suffering at the end, or rail at the unfairness of it. Death is not easy, but I deal with it as well as any theists I know, and better than most.
Just out of interest, does the inverse make sense too?
"This world is full of people who are happy, be it spiritually, or through fulfilled, productive lives. There is joy, and beauty and love in the world. And knowing this, you can tell me you cannot be happy? I cannot focus only on the negatives, and ignore all that is good, and worthy, and beautiful."
Meh...like I said, I go for balance. Over-emphasising negatives is completely redundant. Again, you are looking from a theistic viewpoint. I don't believe in God, don't wonder why things are tough, and appreciate what I have, rather than compare it to some model of perfection which to my mind is in your imagination.
I contend you misunderstand humanity. You add layers to what is evident in the hopes of explaining that which you don't understand. These layers are sometimes effective, and sometimes lead to periods of cognitive dissonance. Why is there suffering in the world? Why is there pain, and death? It's unfair that we don't see those we love after their death. These are all theistic viewpoints. It's not whether they are worthy thoughts, it's more that they are as meaningful to me as wanting x-ray vision would be to you. It's so far from reality you wouldn't even waste a second wishing for it.
Link to original : http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/religious-debates/155772-list-things-you-would-find-wrong-4.html#post3546773
Basically, the subject of secular happiness (or lack thereof) was raised. The following post is the one I'll respond to...
You deserve some response. Yes, I am kind of game playing and sounding a bit confusing, admittedly. And taking some liberties.
But, yes, you got it straight, for the most part. I do believe (by and large, not every single incident) that an old person who does not believe in an after life is putting on a brave face when they say “they are happy.” Why? Well first of all, that assumes we are not talking about that moment or that week or month. I am implying “are you happy with your life and existence as it unfolded and goes forward?”
Yup, I understand. That's why I mentioned 'calm'. I'm not a guy who experiences highs and lows, to any great degree. I'm described as laid-back and easygoing, and take the good with the bad.
So let us take you as an example. You say with complete honesty and assurance that you are quite happy and calm. I surely believe you, and I assume that contention is in reference to your life as a whole and what may follow. Here are my points.
The difference between being alive and dead are as profound as it gets. This is why there is such enormous grief and whaling at funerals. For many (surely atheists) they are mostly stricken because they know they will never see their loved one again. And still they can say they are happy?
This is a very monotheistic view of death. One thing we would agree with is that neither of us thinks our opinion changes the truth of the matter. There is a god or there's not, regardless of what we believe. So, for me, I don't ask myself why someone was taken, try to convince myself they are in a better place, wonder about their suffering at the end, or rail at the unfairness of it. Death is not easy, but I deal with it as well as any theists I know, and better than most.
This world is totally overrun with people who are perpetually in a state of suffering, be it impoverished, or sick, or lonely, or mentally frightened. And knowing the condition of nearly all of your fellow man, you can tell me you are happy? I cannot bear to see all these people suffer their whole lives, I can never be happy knowing this.
Just out of interest, does the inverse make sense too?
"This world is full of people who are happy, be it spiritually, or through fulfilled, productive lives. There is joy, and beauty and love in the world. And knowing this, you can tell me you cannot be happy? I cannot focus only on the negatives, and ignore all that is good, and worthy, and beautiful."
Meh...like I said, I go for balance. Over-emphasising negatives is completely redundant. Again, you are looking from a theistic viewpoint. I don't believe in God, don't wonder why things are tough, and appreciate what I have, rather than compare it to some model of perfection which to my mind is in your imagination.
So I contend if you are truly happy then you are selfish. If it does not bother you that you will not ever see those dear to you again and say you are happy, you are not human. I do not understand?
I contend you misunderstand humanity. You add layers to what is evident in the hopes of explaining that which you don't understand. These layers are sometimes effective, and sometimes lead to periods of cognitive dissonance. Why is there suffering in the world? Why is there pain, and death? It's unfair that we don't see those we love after their death. These are all theistic viewpoints. It's not whether they are worthy thoughts, it's more that they are as meaningful to me as wanting x-ray vision would be to you. It's so far from reality you wouldn't even waste a second wishing for it.
Last edited: