james blunt
Well-Known Member
Define learning?
If you teach something that is wrong, somebody points out why it is wrong, wouldn't you want to be taught back the correct version?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!
- Thread starter james blunt
- Start date
-
- Tags
- fool
If you teach something that is wrong, somebody points out why it is wrong, wouldn't you want to be taught back the correct version?
You didn't demonstrate anything. You made a claim 0+(+0)=1x without explanation or meaning.
If you are so convinced you are right that you won't accept guidance, then there can be no learning.
james blunt
Well-Known Member
x is a vector or 1 dimension if you like. The equation shows us relativity.
james blunt
Well-Known Member
No i didn't , I have explained several times now, a point immediately next to a point is 1 length of x.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Let me try to help one more time. The number of points between any two unequal points (that is different points, if you have two points at one location you have in fact only one point) is infinite. There is no such thing as "adjoining points) since geometric points have no spatial dimensions. They have no length depth or width, they have only location. At any rate here is a quote from an online source:
"Let's assume that your end points are A(0,0) and B(1,0).
Try to find a point in between them. Ok you found C(0.4,0).
Now try finding another point. Will you ever NOT be able to find another point? No, because there are infinite numbers between 0 and 1 (just think of decimals).
In the same way there are infinite points in a line segment."
Why/How are there infinite points in a line segment?
If you have two points then by definition there is space between them and that is filled with an infinite number of points.
"Let's assume that your end points are A(0,0) and B(1,0).
Try to find a point in between them. Ok you found C(0.4,0).
Now try finding another point. Will you ever NOT be able to find another point? No, because there are infinite numbers between 0 and 1 (just think of decimals).
In the same way there are infinite points in a line segment."
Why/How are there infinite points in a line segment?
If you have two points then by definition there is space between them and that is filled with an infinite number of points.
Complete freedom---to be wrong.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
And as I have corrected you oh so many times, there is no such thing as a point immediately next to a point in geometry.
If you believe there is such give an example. We will need the location of each point.
Nope. A point plus a point is two points. Total 'length' of the two points is 0.
james blunt
Well-Known Member
In a R³ space,
= (0) + (+0) = 1x
Nothing here meaningful.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, you only made an unsupported claim again, which I told you would be taken as and admission that you were wrong.
And you seem to be conflating physical facts with geometry. They are not the same. Learning the difference would be very helpful for you in your future debates.
I am attempting to show you where you are wrong and to correct you. You don't want to listen.
james blunt
Well-Known Member
No, that would be not displacing the point , one point to the right or -1 point to the left etc.
You are occupying the same point space with your second point, this cannot happen, a point cannot occupy another point.
No. What you have written has been either wrong or nonsense. You have yet to present a non-trivial true statement.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Okay, I agree, if two points are in the same location then they are one point.
Now put some numbers on your example of two points. You can't have a vague undefined distance between the two of them.
OK, so you define the vector from a to b to be x? And how are the 0's relevant?
james blunt
Well-Known Member
Correct me on ?
I am not wrong about my own notions, that would be an absurd suggestion. Show where my notions are falsifiable?
This does not mean present information from your memory and say because it is written this way .
james blunt
Well-Known Member
I did put the numbers, I will measure it one day and tell you then exactly how many points are in a mm.
Jumi
Well-Known Member
I think the problem is, open to what... there's hard to find anything to hold on to if you don't know the language of mathematics.
Yes, if it is the same point, you get one point out. If you have different points, you get two points, not a line.