Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
Well, "C" is theoretically in a vacuum, and gravitational lensing doesn't actually change the velocity of light, it merely curves it.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!
- Thread starter james blunt
- Start date
-
- Tags
- fool
james blunt
Well-Known Member
Are you sure you want to stick with that statement?
I can show that presently science has the speed of light being faster than time, an impossibility and grave error by Maxwell.
You say no time measurement involved? Are you crazy or something?
Time and distance go hand in hand with c.
Quite clearly you have no idea of what you are talking about on the matter of physics. You have avoided the simple question I asked like the ''losing'' side always does.
A ly equates equal to a time like it or not.
james blunt
Well-Known Member
Something else you do not understand about wave compression theory and light 'slows' travelling through a medium.
It does not curve, it layers and length contracts.
james blunt
Well-Known Member
Earthquake light - Wikipedia
That is called Q.F.P , (quantum field physicality) where field density produces ZpE (zero point energy).
yes I am a genius and know everything .
That is called Q.F.P , (quantum field physicality) where field density produces ZpE (zero point energy).
yes I am a genius and know everything .
Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
Light years do not equal time. They are a unit of distance. What "question" do you think you have asked? If you'd like to show "that presently science has the speed of light being faster than time", I'd love to see you try. But first you need to appreciate that spatial dimension measurement systems exist as static units, and are not time dependent. A light year exists in a second, a day, an hour, a year. It doesn't change. It is not a measurement of time.
Exactly the same way a metre is not a measurement of time.
Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
Light does not travel through a medium, when in a vacuum.
Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
Except the difference between distance measurements and time measurements, apparently.
james blunt
Well-Known Member
I can't help but laugh, if only you knew how wrong science was on lots of things.
The topic title is the question and I gave a diagram and thought experiment earlier which you avoided.
james blunt
Well-Known Member
I never said it did, space is not a vacuum though, a vacuum is a man made concept .
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
Is the question?
Um... all vision is in the past, as light requires time to travel from it's object to our eyes. "you are full of beans" doesn't mean what you seem to think it does. Much like light year, in fact.
Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
I didn't say space was a vacuum, I said that C is measured in a theoretical vacuum. But do go on...
james blunt
Well-Known Member
Answer the question, we will see if I am full of beans. Einstein was a one way thinker...
The speed of light, c, is a velocity. In other words, the ratio between distance and the time it takes to go that distance. In particular, c is about 186,282 miles per second.
A year is a time. In particular, a year is about 3.15*10^7 seconds.
If you multiply a velocity (distance per time) by a time, you get a distance.
In particular, a light year is the *distance* that light travels in one year. This is approximately 5.88*10^12 miles.
Space is close enough to being a vacuum that the difference is rarely useful. There is approximately one hydrogen atom per cubic meter of space.
A year is a time. In particular, a year is about 3.15*10^7 seconds.
If you multiply a velocity (distance per time) by a time, you get a distance.
In particular, a light year is the *distance* that light travels in one year. This is approximately 5.88*10^12 miles.
Space is close enough to being a vacuum that the difference is rarely useful. There is approximately one hydrogen atom per cubic meter of space.
james blunt
Well-Known Member
Please don't insult me by calling me that, I am nowhere near as stupid as him.
Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
I answered the... "question", such as it is.
james blunt
Well-Known Member
Declaring space in being a vacuum is declaring an finite space with boundaries with air outside those boundaries.
james blunt
Well-Known Member
No you didn't
james blunt
Well-Known Member
this question....
Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
Can you offer a single proof of any of Einstein's work being wrong?