• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
What ? can't you read ? Honestly you are being really obtuse if you cannot read that .

Entropy can change in many ways the same as frequency can change in many ways proportional to the change of entropy.

So, where is the constant of proportionality in your equation? And why do you think those two things are proportional? What actual evidence do you have that the entropy change when a gas expands is in any way proportional to *any* sort of frequency change?
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
Especially a math equation whose units are not in agreement. But then, he thinks light years are not a measure of distance, so what do you expect?
They are in agreement.

A change of input is equal to a change of output. Every action has an opposite and equal reaction.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
The same evidence as you provide for time dilation .

Really? What specific tests have you done that are similar to taking Cs clocks around the world to measure time dilation? And, I might add, get results in agreement with the theoretical predictions? What specific tests have you run that stand up to measuring time dilation effects between floors of a building?
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
So, where is the constant of proportionality in your equation? And why do you think those two things are proportional? What actual evidence do you have that the entropy change when a gas expands is in any way proportional to *any* sort of frequency change?

Higher state energy and enphalpic properties.
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
Really? What specific tests have you done that are similar to taking Cs clocks around the world to measure time dilation? And, I might add, get results in agreement with the theoretical predictions? What specific tests have you run that stand up to measuring time dilation effects between floors of a building?
I haven't done any, you have done them all for me already.
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
What is the mechanism that causes the oscillation of the cesium atom to change as they are being moved?
A change of entropy timing.

Δ
c0efbb5b854cd77c8e02a069d69d41b9.gif
= Δ f
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
How does movement cause a change in entropy timing?

When a Caesium is at relative rest at ground state its entropy is set and constant. Now because of quantum entanglement you only have to touch the clock or move the clock and it takes on energy , high state energy passive to low energy states.
When a Caesium is in motion it has less gain than at ground state so emits at a slower rate .
 

Thermos aquaticus

Well-Known Member
When a Caesium is at relative rest at ground state its entropy is set and constant. Now because of quantum entanglement you only have to touch the clock or move the clock and it takes on energy , high state energy passive to low energy states.
When a Caesium is in motion it has less gain than at ground state so emits at a slower rate .

How much energy? Change in entropy is given by this equation:

deltaS = q/T

q=heat transfer (joules)
T=temperature (kelvin)

How does moving the clock cause the clock to change temperature?
 

james blunt

Well-Known Member
How much energy? Change in entropy is given by this equation:

deltaS = q/T

q=heat transfer (joules)
T=temperature (kelvin)

How does moving the clock cause the clock to change temperature?


heat transfer divided by temperature ?

Does that make sense?

The amount is minuscule, probably immeasurable apart from by frequency.

By moving the clock it absorbs less. Consider a moving sponge compared to a stationary sponge in the rain.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top