I heard an occultist online recently argue against my theory that magickal circles (lol) create a psychological weakness and fear in the practitioner by saying they are not for protection. His explanation was that, during ritual, he separates the magick from the mundane, the spiritual from the physical. The circles are, themselves, evidence of more fluffy, pseudo-magick but I was surprised that anyone with any occult knowledge could believe they can separate magick from the "mundane".
This is when I remembered how much such topics vary, how different we define these terms. For me, magick is an intentional act of will, but I realize this is not supernatural and fluffy enough in a lot of cases. So I'm wondering how fellow occultists in my own vein of practice view and define magick? Is there merit to the idea of separating magick from the mundane in ritual?
This is when I remembered how much such topics vary, how different we define these terms. For me, magick is an intentional act of will, but I realize this is not supernatural and fluffy enough in a lot of cases. So I'm wondering how fellow occultists in my own vein of practice view and define magick? Is there merit to the idea of separating magick from the mundane in ritual?