• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Sex Education For Kids

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
Sex education needs to start as early as possible.
You don't start with the mechanics; you start by teaching about 'relationships'.
You teach kids what it is alright for Uncle Ernie to do to the four year old girl. Inappropriate touching.
You teach kids to talk to their parents or teacher if anything happens to them that they were uncomfortable with.
This. Sex education isn’t just about well sex education. A large part in preventative measures with regards to sexual abuse occurs within sex ed. To delay only causes more issues
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
I'm not saying it was better; I'm looking at the two different approaches. One uses labels and the other doesn't. The one that doesn't allows for more fluidity and vagueness, 'just be there doing that', as they say.
You can still be fluid and vague. Why do you think simply having nomenclaure precludes that?
 

Rival

Diex Aie
Staff member
Premium Member
You can still be fluid and vague. Why do you think simply having nomenclaure precludes that?
It makes extensive use of labels.

IOW if a boy exclusively fancies other boys he's called gay.

I don't see why he can't just be a boy. Why does who he wants to sleep with matter at all?
 
Last edited:

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Borne of the Lego thread.

When should we start giving kids sex ed, if ever? My take is at/around puberty, so, 11-12. That seems normal to me.

You?
As soon as they start school. Around here, that would usually be 5.

At that age, the material would be mostly things like the proper terms for body parts, the idea of "good touches" vs. "bad touches," and introducing the importance of consent in an age-appropriate way.
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
I think basic sex ed should be around 11 years old, or in one's final year of primary school, that sort of general area - but LGBTQ stuff? Never. You just learn about that in the course of life. No-one I know had to be sat down and taught about LGBTQ stuff. You just know as you go.
The LGBTQ stuff that should be taught are in the area of sociology, and civics, and equality etc. Not sex.

It is sufficient to teach that Heather has two mommies, you don’t need to go into detail about what they do when they are alone together.

They will learn all about that on the internet.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
It makes extensive use of labels.

IOW if a boy exclusively fancies other boys he's called gay.
... even if he's bi/pan/etc., often.

... which is a problem that proper sex ed would help to address.

I don't see why he can't just be a boy. Why does who he wants to sleep with matter at all?
Anyone who isn't cishet is going to face discrimination and exclusion over their sexual orientation or gender identity at points in their life.

This problem won't go away unless we address it, and education is a huge part of this.

In the meantime, it's important to equip kids properly to deal with the challenges they'll face in life.
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
It makes extensive use of labels.
But that's the beauty of labels: you can choose whether or not to use them. Better sex education including LGBTQ labels would INCREASE people's ability to associate or not.

IOW if a boy exclusively fancies other boys he's called gay.
But they can choose to adopt that identity or not, and they can choose whether or not to make that public. They can be as private or as public as they want. The only difference between the Victorian era in that respect is that they have less reason to fear massive social repercussuons, arrest and death by being public (which is most likely the main driving force behind Victorian ambiguity than personal choice and preference).

I don't see why he can't just be a boy. Why does who he wants to sleep with matter at all?
I really am not sure if you have been reading my posts or not... It needn't matter at all to him or anyone, but if they WANT it to matter, it can.

What is the issue?
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
The LGBTQ stuff that should be taught are in the area of sociology, and civics, and equality etc. Not sex.

It is sufficient to teach that Heather has two mommies, you don’t need to go into detail about what they do when they are alone together.

They will learn all about that on the internet.
IIRC, what used to be called "sex ed" is now called something like "families and relationships" here now, and the material covers much more than just the mechanics of sex.
 

Rival

Diex Aie
Staff member
Premium Member
Anyone who isn't cishet is going to face discrimination and exclusion over their sexual orientation or gender identity at points in their life.
I just cannot say I've come across this much. I live in a pretty crime-y area and yet I've never heard of hate crimes against gay folks.

Again, for me it's a matter of respect for people as people. End of.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
Borne of the Lego thread.

When should we start giving kids sex ed, if ever? My take is at/around puberty, so, 11-12. That seems normal to me.

You?
Like I said in the other thread. This is the age of information. You wait until they’re 11 or 12 and they’ll be schooling you lol
I’m not saying throw everything at them at once. But establishing an open dialogue early on I think is useful.
It’s better having little Suzie openly ask whether her friend’s info on “kissing diseases” is accurate or not than have them learn it from their friend or worse Google. Sexuality and identities etc I actually first learnt in my sociology class, oddly enough. As far as my formal education was concerned anyway
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
I just cannot say I've come across this much. I live in a pretty crime-y area and yet I've never heard of hate crimes against gay folks.
Do you think that physical violence is the only way anti-LGBTQ discrimination gets expressed?

Again, for me it's a matter of respect for people as people. End of.
I'm getting a very "all lives matter" vibe off your posts in this thread. This isn't a good thing.
 

Rival

Diex Aie
Staff member
Premium Member
Do you think that physical violence is the only way anti-LGBTQ discrimination gets expressed?
No, but in the main, gay folks here just aren't having that many problems. If they are discriminated against, they go to the police.

I'm getting a very "all lives matter" vibe off your posts in this thread. This isn't a good thing.
No.

I'm suggesting we teach respect as an abstract value, independent of any group. Each person has a soul, or whatever your culture calls it, and we should respect them as a person. The person behind the counter. The person bringing the mail. The dope smoker who lives next door. Respect shouldn't be divided by group. That's teaching people to divide. It should have nothing to do with any 'protected characteristic'.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
No, but in the main, gay folks here just aren't having that many problems. If they are discriminated against, they go to the police.
What do you expect the police to do if, say, a teen loses her friends when she comes out as lesbian? When a gay guy's family tells him that his boyfriend isn't welcome at Christmas dinner (even though his sister's boyfriend is)?

How about when a trans person gets an interview but doesn't get picked for the job, and she suspects - but has no way to confirm - that it was because she's trans?

No.

I'm suggesting we teach respect as an abstract value, independent of any group. Each person has a soul, or whatever your culture calls it, and we should respect them as a person. The person behind the counter. The person bringing the mail. The dope smoker who lives next door. Respect shouldn't be divided by group. That's teaching people to divide. It should have nothing to do with any 'protected characteristic'.
IOW, you want to not directly engage with discrimination.
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Borne of the Lego thread.

When should we start giving kids sex ed, if ever? My take is at/around puberty, so, 11-12. That seems normal to me.

You?
Parents should be advised by the school to begin educating their children, and children should be sent home with a letter for the parents to sign about it. That is the proper way. Educate the parents, and have them sign off that they either refuse or have taught the subject or would like their kids to be taught on computer. Don't have sex ed classes across the board as if the state owned the children. Parents must agree. Parents are indispensable whether children get educated or not. Gradually move lessons towards computers, and keep parents involved when it comes to this very intimate lesson.

When I was twelve I first heard about sex from other students in my class. I think this was the wrong way. My parents failed in this, but the school failed my parents by not sending home a letter prompting.
 

Rival

Diex Aie
Staff member
Premium Member
What do you expect the police to do if, say, a teen loses her friends when she comes out as lesbian? When a gay guy's family tells him that his boyfriend isn't welcome at Christmas dinner (even though his sister's boyfriend is)?

How about when a trans person gets an interview but doesn't get picked for the job, and she suspects - but has no way to confirm - that it was because she's trans?
I expect them to move on and deal with it.

IOW, you want to not directly engage with discrimination.
I want to prevent it.
 

exchemist

Veteran Member
Again, nobody REQUIRES it, but it CAN be helpful.

Do you remember the part in 1984 where Orwell mentions how, under Big Brother, the dictionaries kept getting smaller? Their intention was pretty explicit:

“‘Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thought crime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it.’”

Imagine being a gay man in a world where the word "gay" or any words even relating to it didn't exist. How much more difficult do you think it would be to come to terms with what you are in yourself, much less for other people to do so? By narrowing the range of language, you are not just limiting people's ability to talk about - and therefore understand - it, but you are limiting people's ability to even comprehend or coneptualize that thing in their own mind.

Words are a powerful social apparratus that not only allow us to bridge gaps in knowledge between ourselves and others, but to create and broaden the knowledge we have of ourselves.
I find this a very profound insight.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
I expect them to move on and deal with it.
I thought you said you wanted to teach "respect as an abstract value."

The parents who, in 30-40 years, will be deciding whether to invite their kids' partners to dinner are kids in school right now.

I want to prevent it.
Preventing discrimination will be... difficult if we don't confront it.
 

Rival

Diex Aie
Staff member
Premium Member
I thought you said you wanted to teach "respect as an abstract value."
I do. Not sure what this has to do with that though?

The parents who, in 30-40 years, will be deciding whether to invite their kids' partners to dinner are kids in school right now.
Again, we must live in different worlds. The world of youth I see around me is not prejudiced against gay people, or trans people, or black people, or many other people. I just don't see it. Back in the day when my father was a kid, his father, who was born in the late 40s, asked him what his sexuality was. He didn't give a damn in the 70s-80s, and I'm finding that very, very few folks give a damn now. I don't know where you live, but where I live isn't some kind of discriminatory hellhole.

Preventing discrimination will be... difficult if we don't confront it.
Teach the kids at school respect for human beings regardless of XYZ, that's it.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
Here is what we do in Ontario's education system:

Grade 1
When children know how to care for and use the correct names of their body parts, they build understanding and respect for themselves and their bodies and can communicate clearly and ask for help in case of illness, injury or abuse.

Students will learn:
  • to identify body parts, including genitalia, by their proper names
  • to use positive language when describing their bodies
  • about their senses and how they function
  • basic good hygiene habits (for example, washing your hands, using tissues)
Grade 2
Helping children to understand that their bodies will change (for example, losing baby teeth) can help them:
  • prepare for and adjust to those changes
  • appreciate what their bodies are able to do and perceive them positively
  • communicate about these changes with a trusted adult if they ever feel confused
Students will learn:
  • the basic stages of human development (infancy, childhood, adolescence) and related body changes
  • good hygiene habits for oral health (for example, brushing your teeth, flossing, visiting the dentist regularly)
  • to appreciate what their bodies can do
Grade 3
To foster healthy relationships, students will learn what healthy relationships look like. Students also learn about what makes them unique and how to show respect for all.

Students will learn:
  • about characteristics of healthy relationships and consent (for example, accepting differences, listening, stating and respecting personal boundaries, being respectful, being honest, communicating openly)
  • describe ways to respond to bullying and other challenges (for example, peer pressure, being left out)
  • about factors and habits that can affect physical and emotional development (for example, safe environment, caring adults, feeling like you belong, appreciating what your body can do and building a healthy body image, sleep, food, physical activity)
  • how visible differences (for example, skin, hair and eye colour, clothing, physical ability) and invisible differences (for example, learning abilities, cultural values and beliefs, different types of families) make each person unique
  • ways of showing respect for differences in others
Grade 4
Today, children enter puberty earlier: on average, girls enter puberty between the ages of 8 and 13 and boys enter puberty between the ages of 9 and 14. Learning about puberty before students may fully experience it helps prepare young people for changes in their bodies, emotions and social relationships.

Students will learn:
  • the physical changes that happen during puberty, and the emotional and social impact these changes can have on a developing child
  • how personal hygiene needs may change during puberty (for example, the increased importance of regular bathing)
Grade 5
By Grade 5, students have developed some self-awareness and coping skills, and have also learned critical thinking and reflective skills.

Puberty can be stressful and helping students to understand changes in their bodies can help them cope. Students will also continue to learn the importance of showing acceptance and respect for themselves and others, including those who may be entering puberty earlier or later than their peers.

Students will learn:
  • about factors that may affect the development of a person's understanding of themselves and their personal identity, including their sexual orientation (for example, body image, self-acceptance)
  • about the reproductive system, and how the body changes during puberty
  • about the process of menstruation and sperm production
  • to describe emotional and interpersonal stresses related to puberty
Grade 6
As children grow older and enter adolescence, understanding how they and their peers may be affected by the many changes they are experiencing helps them build a healthy sense of who they are.

By Grade 6, students have developed more self-awareness and coping skills, as well as critical thinking and reflective skills, to solve problems and examine issues. They will apply these skills to learning about stereotypes and assumptions.

By examining and challenging these stereotypes and assumptions, they continue to learn about respect for others, and build self-confidence to build a foundation for healthy relationships.

Students will learn:
  • an understanding about the impacts of viewing sexually explicit media, including pornography
  • the physical, social and emotional changes that may occur in adolescence (for example, body growth, skin changes, increasing influence of peers, increased intensity of feelings) and how students can build a healthy foundation for relationships
  • to make decisions in their personal relationships that show respect for themselves and others, recognizing the importance of consent and clear communication
  • how stereotypes — and assumptions about gender, race, sexual orientation, ethnicity, culture and abilities — can affect how a person feels about themselves, their feelings of belonging and relationships with others
  • appropriate ways to respond to and challenge assumptions, stereotypes, homophobia and racism
Grade 7
Students need information and skills to make sound decisions about their health and well-being before they face a situation where they may need that information.

Research has shown that teaching about sexual health and human development does not increase sexual behaviour and can actually prevent risky activity.

Students will learn:
  • the importance of having a shared understanding with a partner about: reasons for delaying sexual activity until they are older, the concept of consent and how to communicate consent, and the need to clearly communicate and understand decisions about sexual activity in a healthy relationship
  • to identify common sexually transmitted and blood borne infections (STBBIs) and describe their symptoms
  • how to prevent STBBIs and avoid becoming a parent before they are ready, including delaying first intercourse and other sexual activities until they are older, and using condoms and other forms of protection consistently
  • about the physical, emotional, social and psychological factors to consider when making sexual health decisions (for example, the risk of STBBIs or of becoming a parent before they are ready, emotional readiness, sexual orientation, moral and religious considerations, cultural teachings, and impact on other relationships)
  • how relationships with others and sexual health may be affected by physical and emotional changes in puberty and adolescence
Grade 8
Students continue to build their understanding of factors that support positive, healthy choices, including building a deeper understanding and appreciation of themselves and their identity. Students are also exploring healthy ways to engage in evolving and new relationships.

Students will learn about:
  • things that could affect someone's ability to make safe and healthy decisions about sexual activity
  • sources of support with respect to sexual health (for example, parents, health professionals, in-school resources, local community groups and religious, spiritual, and cultural leaders)
  • gender identity, gender expression and sexual orientation, and to identify factors that can help all young people to develop positive personal identities
  • abstinence, contraception and consent in order to make safe and healthy decisions about sexual activity
  • benefits, risks and drawbacks associated with relationships involving different degrees of sexual intimacy
 

Curious George

Veteran Member
I think part of the problem here is that what exactly "sex ed" is. To most people, it basically means explicitly talking about how intercourse works and basic stuff about contraception. That's fine, but it's hardly the full breadth of the subject. Personally, I think the biological aspects of sex are better taught in a science classroom, while sex ed classes should focus more on sociological aspects and essentially be something that is taught from a young age and into adulthood, covering a wide variety of topics at different age-appropriate intervals. For me, sex ed shouldn't be this one, monolithic event that happens for one very awkward afternoon to a bunch of giggling ternagers - it should be its own field of study that is continuous and potentially lifelong.
^^This.

And include in those lifelong lessons parenting classes.

People, in general,should know and understand their own bodies, know and understand others, know and understand relationships, know and understand their rights, know and understand what community services are available and accessible, and know and understand how to care for each other and children.
 
Top