Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
That is only a matter of opinion. In fact in practice the number one function of sex is fun.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Sex strike
- Thread starter Enoch07
- Start date
Sure, so long as both involved are ready to accept all consequences of that action.
Alyssa Milano's sex strike is misguided. Here's what actually might work (opinion) - CNN
Hmmmm so she's encouraging women to not have sex to negate the risk of pregnancy?
Congratulations, you just backdoored your way into sexual morality!You shouldn't be having sex with anyone, your not prepared to have a child with!
I hope all liberal women join Alyssa Milano and support her sex strike. She might make moral people out of pro-choice supporters after all!
Guys have their own "sex strike". This is basically what MGTOW is, Men who Go Their Own Way.
They feel a lifetime without women is the best way to go. No wife, no kids, no alimony.
Decline of the family. Don't know if will be better off for it or not. I suppose marriage and kids are comprise. Nobody wants to compromise anymore.
Wandering Monk
Well-Known Member
Sex between two people is a beautiful thing. Between three, it's fantastic. - Woody Allen.
Wandering Monk
Well-Known Member
Meanwhile, Americans are having less sex.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...icans-not-having-sex-has-reached-record-high/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...icans-not-having-sex-has-reached-record-high/
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No problem. Sometimes accepting the consequences even involves abortion.
Wandering Monk
Well-Known Member
Women want to have control over their body, ok, make sure to take steps to prevent pregnancy. Getting pregnant in the first place is the result of a lack of control.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
So are Brits from what I have heard it is attributed to social media:
British people 'having less sex'
Hmm. . . . could social media be the new birth control?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
One can't blame just women. It takes two to tango.
Even with birth control pregnancy is a possibility. There is only a single 100% guaranteed way to avoid pregnancy.
I am betting i have far more sex for fun than sex for reproduction. In fact for fun, several times a week, for reproduction just twice in my lifetime.
And i would guess that most well well adjusted people have a similar ratio
That's not accepting the consequence that's destroying the consequence.
No it's a biological fact.
Otherwise women wouldn't need to suffer periods, and men would shoot confetti.
Yes, men cannot control their ejaculation. Its a sad prospect when women control their own bodies and men cant control theirs.
Ah but that doesn't change the fact it is the #1 biological reason.
The reason you have it for fun is psychological reasons (fun).
You introduced biological, that is not my concern
Sex for reproduction is only a tiny fraction of human sex.
Well it's my thread and my topic so yeah I introduced it.
The primary function of the sex act is biological, which is reproduction. It's the whole reason you and I exist, literally!
Just because people have it for fun more than with the content to reproduce doesn't negate its primary biological function.
BSM1
What? Me worry?
Alyssa Milano's sex strike is misguided. Here's what actually might work (opinion) - CNN
Hmmmm so she's encouraging women to not have sex to negate the risk of pregnancy?
Congratulations, you just backdoored your way into sexual morality!
I hope all liberal women join Alyssa Milano and support her sex strike. She might make moral people out of pro-choice supporters after all!
Well, dang...I thought "Sex Strike" might have had something to do with BDSM pointers.....
Shad
Veteran Member
Alyssa Milano's sex strike is misguided. Here's what actually might work (opinion) - CNN
Hmmmm so she's encouraging women to not have sex to negate the risk of pregnancy?
Congratulations, you just backdoored your way into sexual morality!
I hope all liberal women join Alyssa Milano and support her sex strike. She might make moral people out of pro-choice supporters after all!
Milano only demonstrated she is a weak woman due the power she places on sex as a bargaining tool. This is the difference between a sexual revolution feminist and an equality feminist. The former act irresponsible and whines while the latter acts responsible and accepts the results of their own actions.
Also ironic as she just used a pro-life argument of having sex when one is prepared to have children. Amusing when someone freaks out to the point they advocate what the opposition has been saying for years.
Last edited: