Spiderman
Veteran Member
I hear that human flesh is a lot more nutritious than a cow's Flesh , and it makes sense because a cow mainly eats grass and hay, humans have a more balanced diet so their flesh will have a lot more vitamins.
If we lived in a time where there was no laws saying you can't eat people, would you find anything morally wrong with it?
In that true story called alive, a rugby team that crashed their plane survived off eating the corpses of their friends.
They compared it to Holy Communion, And each of them agreed that if they were the next one to die, that they would like to be eaten and use their body to keep their friends alive.
Please explain why it would be wrong to eat human flesh.
I personally would rather my Flesh was to nourish another person rather than just rot.
What is it that makes it more gross than eating a cow?
If we lived in a time where there was no laws saying you can't eat people, would you find anything morally wrong with it?
In that true story called alive, a rugby team that crashed their plane survived off eating the corpses of their friends.
They compared it to Holy Communion, And each of them agreed that if they were the next one to die, that they would like to be eaten and use their body to keep their friends alive.
Please explain why it would be wrong to eat human flesh.
I personally would rather my Flesh was to nourish another person rather than just rot.
What is it that makes it more gross than eating a cow?