• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Should illegal Rohingyas be deported?

Should illegal Rohingyas be deported to Myanmar


  • Total voters
    13

RoaringSilence

Active Member
But aren't Muslims unsafe in India according to Western human rights organizations? And now these are the same people who are pressurizing India not to deport them?

Better option would be to deport them to any Islamic country where they can follow Shari'a and can be the victims at the same time. But we all know no any Islamic country wants to take them in. We know the reason.

When it comes to refugees , islamic leading countries never step up to own their own people , and try to shove them to where they don't belong ..coz the objective is to spread the religion not to contain it. they have been taught to spread religion by population explosion , i'm too lazy to pull out the exact source of this but this happens to be a known strategy which i read at CEMB forum ( council of ex muslims of Britain ) .

there was an instance where mohd. or some other warrior leader at mohd's times had married a tribe leader's daughter with the sole purpose to spread the religion . and they have an instruction to have more babies to spread it too.

if anyone is keen to know the exact info maybe just ask anyone on cemb to help you ..with source and info.
 
Last edited:

The Emperor of Mankind

Currently the galaxy's spookiest paraplegic
But aren't Muslims unsafe in India according to Western human rights organizations? And now these are the same people who are pressurizing India not to deport them?

Better option would be to deport them to any Islamic country where they can follow Shari'a and can be the victims at the same time. But we all know no any Islamic country wants to take them in. We know the reason.

I think the degree of danger for Muslims in India is significantly lower than in Myanmar. The original question asked if they should be deported to Myanmar; it didn't deal with sending Rohingya refugees on to somewhere else. They're at more risk of harm in Myanmar than in India.
 

The Emperor of Mankind

Currently the galaxy's spookiest paraplegic
When it comes to refugees , islamic leading countries never step up to own their own people , and try to shove them to where they don't belong

I'm not sure this is true. Lebanon has taken in approximately 1.5 million refugees fleeing Syria; Kuwait apparently has 120,000 refugees and apparently Saudi Arabia has offered residency permits to 100,000 Syrians but only to those who have family in the kingdom - and they're not classed as refugees.

Source
 

RoaringSilence

Active Member
I'm not sure this is true. Lebanon has taken in approximately 1.5 million refugees fleeing Syria; Kuwait apparently has 120,000 refugees and apparently Saudi Arabia has offered residency permits to 100,000 Syrians but only to those who have family in the kingdom - and they're not classed as refugees.

Source
well then , now rohingas need the ummah kindly pick them up tyvm.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
But aren't Muslims unsafe in India according to Western human rights organizations? And now these are the same people who are pressurizing India not to deport them?
Yes. India has done a bad job of preventing religious violence in the past, but it still has a moral duty to not send people back into a genocide.
 

RoaringSilence

Active Member
Yes. India has done a bad job of preventing religious violence in the past, but it still has a moral duty to not send people back into a genocide.
not only india , all countries who deal with muslims are bound to be labelled as a bad job doer , because no matter what happens its always the non muslim who is cruel and muslim always the victim , this is the ONLY one true narrative.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
not only india , all countries who deal with muslims are bound to be labelled as a bad job doer , because no matter what happens its always the non muslim who is cruel and muslim always the victim , this is the ONLY one true narrative.
Dude: people are dying. However hard done by you feel, the people fleeing for their lives are in worse shape than you.
 

RoaringSilence

Active Member
Dude: people are dying. However hard done by you feel, the people fleeing for their lives are in worse shape than you.

i m more concerned about how a monk becomes a terrorist , what was the frustration behind it , how did a monk fail and resort to that.. what could possibly be so thorny in the butt that made a monk violent . when china killed monks to capture Tibet , they still protest for decades ..peacefully and get nowhere. maybe these monks took a lesson from the failure of Tibetan monks to get a resolve through non violence..

and bloodshed happens mostly in the reverse order , i know its always good to be diplomatic and flow with correct versions of diplomatic talk, somehow i lack the manners , so kindly forgive me.
 

Stormcry

Well-Known Member
I think the degree of danger for Muslims in India is significantly lower than in Myanmar. The original question asked if they should be deported to Myanmar; it didn't deal with sending Rohingya refugees on to somewhere else.
Wrong! As per the narratives of liberals and HR orgs, Muslims are targeted everyday in India. Some even used massacre word. This can't be a less significant thing.

They're at more risk of harm in Myanmar than in India.
Exactly that's what I'm tryna say. They're at more risk of harm in India than in Islamic country.
 

Stormcry

Well-Known Member
Dude: people are dying. However hard done by you feel, the people fleeing for their lives are in worse shape than you.

People might die in India too. Rohingya Muslims' ARSA terror organization creating havoc in Bangladesh and Myanmar. And seriously, India is not bound by any refugee laws, neither it has a moral duty to harbor potentially dangerous people.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20170908_184505.jpg
    IMG_20170908_184505.jpg
    89.6 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_20170908_184502.jpg
    IMG_20170908_184502.jpg
    42.6 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:

RoaringSilence

Active Member
People might die in India too. Rohingya Muslims' ARSA terror organization creating havoc in Bangladesh and Myanmar. And seriously, India is not bound by any refugee laws, neither it has a moral duty to harbor potentially dangerous people.
they don't deserve indian hospitality for longer than needed by human standards. we don't want the ummah to cherry pick and take a few useful rohingas ..and leave the useless ones for india to deal with.. you take the whole package to your country and teach them how to respect other peoples religions and temples.
 

The Emperor of Mankind

Currently the galaxy's spookiest paraplegic
Wrong! As per the narratives of liberals and HR orgs, Muslims are targeted everyday in India. Some even used massacre word. This can't be a less significant thing.

I don't deny Muslims are targeted in India; I just don't think it's to the same extent as Myanmar otherwise we'd be seeing Muslim refugees from India going places.


Exactly that's what I'm tryna say. They're at more risk of harm in India than in Islamic country.

That depends on the Islamic country. I doubt Shia Muslims would want to live in Iraq or Saudi Arabia, for instance. Sunnis wouldn't get a good deal in Iran and Ahmadis would be murdered by the government in Pakistan.
 
Top