• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Should incest be banned?

ChristineES

Tiggerism
Premium Member
I just don't think that incest is the same as homosexuality. A brother is able to impregnate his sister, and that can cause birth defects. Gays can have children only if they adopt or have a surrogate parent or sperm donor or something (I hope saying that isn't insensitive or anything, let me know if it is, and I will remove it)
 

McBell

Admiral Obvious
I just don't think that incest is the same as homosexuality.

Nor do I.
However, listening to the main argument given by the OP, they are being treated as one and the same since the exact same two reasons are given to ban them: Its yucky and god said no.
 

The Sum of Awe

Brought to you by the moment that spacetime began.
Can someone explain the problem with incest other than deformed children which can be solved with medical science if it needs to?
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
"Incest decreases the variety of the gene pool and thus allows (detrimental) recessive mutations to become obvious and cause phenotypes and diseases. If you take two related individuals both heterozygous (and thus phenotypically normal) for a given gene defect and mate them, then 25% of the offspring will be homozygous and thus have the condition."
source
So, aside from incestuous relationships that would lead to a pregnancy, I see no need to criminalize incestuous relations that would otherwise be legal between consenting adults.
 

Gjallarhorn

N'yog-Sothep
This the same old story as the bestiality debate.

Surely saying 'ew' is a good enough reason to ban such behaviour?

Public opinion, consensus, morality issues - doesn't that mean anything to you?
Public opinion once held that the sun revolved around the Earth. Morality issues used to find no fault in slavery or rape.
 

ChristineES

Tiggerism
Premium Member
Public opinion once held that the sun revolved around the Earth. Morality issues used to find no fault in slavery or rape.

Those examples are not at all the same thing as incest, the way I see it. And it is more than just "God says no and I don't like it". Even before I had faith, it was creepy to me and I have known people who have never had any faith who find it creepy. But, as I said, I wouldn't know if this is just a inborn revulsion or something learned from society (not necessarily religion).
 

beenie

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
The problem is, we can't base our laws on what creeps us out. As much as I personally don't like it, I can't impose my creep factor on consenting adults.

Of course, that is putting all religious indoctrination aside.
 

The Sum of Awe

Brought to you by the moment that spacetime began.
Those examples are not at all the same thing as incest, the way I see it. And it is more than just "God says no and I don't like it". Even before I had faith, it was creepy to me and I have known people who have never had any faith who find it creepy. But, as I said, I wouldn't know if this is just a inborn revulsion or something learned from society (not necessarily religion).

If I may ask, if it isn't just because you don't like it, what is the reason why it is "wrong"?
 

ChristineES

Tiggerism
Premium Member
If I may ask, if it isn't just because you don't like it, what is the reason why it is "wrong"?

It isn't that I think it "right" or "wrong", or that it creeps me or that it creeps a great majority of people out. It just feels wrong on a basic level. That is just my own personal feeling and as I keep saying, I don't know if it is an inborn thing or just something I learned from my peers and society at large. But I don't want to condemn others and I won't. The same goes with bestiality- it just feels wrong to me. I can't help the way I feel about it. I don't want to lie and say I feel perfectly fine about it, either.
 

The Sum of Awe

Brought to you by the moment that spacetime began.
It isn't that I think it "right" or "wrong", or that it creeps me or that it creeps a great majority of people out. It just feels wrong on a basic level. That is just my own personal feeling and as I keep saying, I don't know if it is an inborn thing or just something I learned from my peers and society at large. But I don't want to condemn others and I won't. The same goes with bestiality- it just feels wrong to me. I can't help the way I feel about it. I don't want to lie and say I feel perfectly fine about it, either.

Okay, gotcha :)

Although beastiality is more of a rape, there could be reason why it should be illegal.
 

beenie

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I thought you were asking for proof of the high disability rate.
Yes they do have a high amount of cousins do marry, ask a Muslim.

I know they do.

You said that disabilities are a result of inter-cousin marriage, and I asked for proof of that claim.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
First you have to define what is a close family member? It can make a pretty big difference depending on what culture you are in, especially when trying to define incest.
Other than moral perspectives there is nothing wrong with it. And while the birth defects thing is true, it's less than a half truth. If a brother and sister have a child together, assuming they are both healthy, have about the same the chance of having a child born with birth defects than any other randomly selected child. It's after multiple generations that inter breeding MIGHT cause a genetic problems. There is an equal chance though that beneficial genetic mutations will be passed down. There may also be nothing good or bad. Eventually a homogeneous breeding group can produce genetic clones that lack any genetic flaws.
 

Drolefille

PolyPanGeekGirl
Those examples are not at all the same thing as incest, the way I see it. And it is more than just "God says no and I don't like it". Even before I had faith, it was creepy to me and I have known people who have never had any faith who find it creepy. But, as I said, I wouldn't know if this is just a inborn revulsion or something learned from society (not necessarily religion).
There is a psychological process that happens when one is raised with one's siblings as children. Almost always this results in the siblings not being considered acceptable mates. So your revulsion may be cultural, but the aversion to marrying one's own siblings is fairly natural. I've not seen if that's been tested cross-culturally though so perhaps someone else can.

Besides the risk of birth defects -which are relatively small and become a problem in future generations more than in the first generation unless there's a particular recessive gene both siblings have - the one concern I have with incest relationships is the inherent inequality that can exist. Particularly if there's a parent/child factor, but often still with a brother/sister. I think there are some questions about whether consent is freely given. I wouldn't be jumping up and down to ban them though were they not already.

Now two siblings or half siblings who never met until adulthood? Sure, no problem - and there's no aversion built in because they didn't grow up together.

Found an article: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=evolving-mechanism-avoid-sibling-sex
 
Top