comprehend said:
hmmm.
This thread reads like a bunch of pot heads rationalizing to me.
Apparently you've never read any of the threads that actually were 'a bunch of potheads rationalising', if that's your take on the this one. It's the first of these that I've ever come across here that hasn't degenerated into 'Studies showing negative effects are all junk science/there's no negative effects/I can do whatever drugs and be fit to drive, unlike you and your bottle of wine/no-one who ever smoked marijuana ever gets violent or psychotic, and I don't care that your personal experience is different to mine, because you're wrong and I'm right' within a very short matter of time.
The simple fact of the matter is,
it's currently easier and cheaper for kids to get drugs than it is for them to get drunk. That comes down solely to the fact that alcohol is legal and regulated and taxed and expensive and potentially hard to get hold of without your parents noticing, but you can get enough of some substances to keep you flying for the night for as little as $5 from some guy off the street, no questions asked.
If someone comes up with a way to freeze alcohol and make it an icy pole - which happened - there's an uproar and people accuse them of marketing to children and the product is pulled from the market uner a dark cloud.
You come up with some sort of an illicit drug that's looks like an M&M with Bart Simpsons head impressed into it, no one says anything. You know why? Because they don't know, and the 10 year olds that crashed in their school playground after taking drugs that were made to look just like that and actually
were marketed to kids didn't tell anyone because hey, they just looked like candy and the person they got it off never told them it could kill them.
No-one is keeping their kids safe from nasties by keeping those nasties illegal...it might be nice to think that, but in reality it makes it easier for unscrupulous people who don't give a **** and have nothing to lose to market their product to the children of people who think that illegality makes us all safe. That saying,'Thou shalt not take illegal drugs!' means they wont.
Now, before you paint me with your handy 'rationalising pothead' brush, let me tell you a few things about myself. I have never smoked marijuana - or taken any other sort of drug - nor have I ever been interested in doing so, despite the fact that a couple of people I knew briefly thought it was their mission in life to get me high when they found out I never had been. Other than one particular girl - who I will get to in a moment - none of my friends I grew up with ever used drugs either, at least in the time I knew them, which for some was over 17 years. The girl that did, had ADHD and was put on valium by a doctor at the age of
4. By 16 she was a heroin addict. I sat there with her ex boyfriend literally crying on my shoulder one night at a school camp because we were watching her crash and burn and she couldn't be helped. At 18 she nearly died of an overdose.
I don't take drugs, I never have, I have no interest in ever doing so. So put away the brush and see what the actual arguments being made are and who is making them.
Oh, and Michel, I've read that study in it's entirity and last I heard they still weren't sure if the cannabis was causing the problems or if these were people with pre-existing problems who were self medicating with cannabis and causing themselves more problems.
Plenty of people who already have problems self medicate themselves to a standstill with alcohol.