Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
sparc872 said:Legalizing prostitution would provide women who choose to have sex for money a legal means to protect themselves and it would allow them a chance to move beyond their current position. Whether the person makes a conscious decision to become a prostitute or not is a very important factor in determining the harm done to someone in the prostitution industry however. Many people who go into the industry are forced there due to circumstances decided for them prior to their birth. They are born into a situation where prostitution is the only means to survival and I am sure that, if given a chance to survive without prostitution, many of them would jump at it. The harm done to some prostitutes is something that they should be protected against, but if the woman openly decides to become a prostitute, then I see no reason why she should be prevented from having sex for money provided it occurs in a safe manner.
I have switched my view and now feel that prostitution should be legalized, but not without a major effort to help prostitutes who want to get out of their current setting. Allowing them to continue to live in an impovershed setting does nothing to correct the problem while a social program to help them make a living they actually want would make bounds in fixing the situation.
... And more prisons to house these 'criminals'?Money and effort seems better spent on welfare, education, and work programs....
Buddy, while you are giggling hysterically like a little school girl, it is actually being applied in Nevada, in many European countries and contemplated in Canada... and it is working. There's a whole world out there; check it out sometime!That makes absolutely no sense to me and is laughable.
I hope that the MODs see this and act accordingly. Lord knows I have been chastised for less.egroen said:Buddy, while you are giggling hysterically like a little school girl, it is actually being applied in Nevada, in many European countries and contemplated in Canada... and it is working. There's a whole world out there; check it out sometime!
-Erin
My sensabilities have nothing to do with following the rules of the forum. When you are here longer than a month, maybe you will understand that.egroen said:I apologize for assaulting your delicate sensibilities, dear... and accept whatever chastisement I get for my malicious personal attack.
But if you do care to read a little more of the thread (and the other) you will see many of the issues you raise have been expounded upon.
-Erin
Fluffy said:Illegal prostitution means helping the abuse of children and women. Legalising it will take away this problem (along with others such as STI spread) whilst allowing people to enjoy the harmless service that prostitution provides.
How so?Prostitution in itself is abuse,
mr.guy said:How so?
Given that it is possible to help these women and men out of poverty via other means it seems that your argument is rather weak. Money and effort seems better spent on welfare, education, and work programs.
That's a very loose use of objectification, angellous.angellous_evangellous said:In the best possible circumstance, it is the reduction of a human being to a mere object to be traded.
Plenty of valid and legal proffesions could be described thusly.On an ethical level it is no different than slavery - the person purchased is human chattel, a tool and not a person.
While slavery and prostitution can mix pretty easily, it isn't fair to now make them synonyms.The client is nothing more than an owner of another person.
Exploitation can potentially be better addressed when the complainants CAN report grievences.The exploitation of the poor people who are normally prostitutes is absolutely heartwrenching.
Except they'd be paid, so it's pretty much completely different from slavery. In fact, one could almost say it's a job and not part of the slave trade with someone being paid and being able to quit any time they want. :sarcasticangellous_evangellous said:In the best possible circumstance, it is the reduction of a human being to a mere object to be traded. On an ethical level it is no different than slavery - the person purchased is human chattel, a tool and not a person.
mr.guy said:That's a very loose use of objectification, angellous.
Complaints can be reported in the current system.