• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Should the Democrat Party be "eradicated politically" off of the voter poll?


  • Total voters
    23
  • Poll closed .
Should the Democrat Party be "eradicated politically" off of the voter poll?

Some people might have the interesting, but rare perception that only Libertarians, Independents, People of No Political Affiliation, and Republicans can make "Good Decisions" on any political issues. However many Democrats claim that they make "Great Decisions" such as give 1/3 of your hard earned tax dollars back to the government, control by welfare, depopulating our planet through abortion, submitting yourself to climate agreements and carbon taxes, staying home, wearing a mask, gene therapy vaccines, and being a doormat for the World Economic Forum.
 

PoetPhilosopher

Veteran Member
Should the Democrat Party be "eradicated politically" off of the voter poll?

Some people might have the interesting, but rare perception that only Libertarians, Independents, People of No Political Affiliation, and Republicans can make "Good Decisions" on any political issues. However many Democrats claim that they make "Great Decisions" such as give 1/3 of your hard earned tax dollars back to the government, control by welfare, depopulating our planet through abortion, submitting yourself to climate agreements and carbon taxes, staying home, wearing a mask, gene therapy vaccines, and being a doormat for the World Economic Forum.

No.

And doing it the wrong way probably has the chance of starting a civil war.
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Should the Democrat Party be "eradicated politically" off of the voter poll?

Some people might have the interesting, but rare perception that only Libertarians, Independents, People of No Political Affiliation, and Republicans can make "Good Decisions" on any political issues. However many Democrats claim that they make "Great Decisions" such as give 1/3 of your hard earned tax dollars back to the government, control by welfare, depopulating our planet through abortion, submitting yourself to climate agreements and carbon taxes, staying home, wearing a mask, gene therapy vaccines, and being a doormat for the World Economic Forum.
It seems your understanding of liberal policies are far removed from reality.
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Should the Democrat Party be "eradicated politically" off of the voter poll?

Some people might have the interesting, but rare perception that only Libertarians, Independents, People of No Political Affiliation, and Republicans can make "Good Decisions" on any political issues. However many Democrats claim that they make "Great Decisions" such as give 1/3 of your hard earned tax dollars back to the government, control by welfare, depopulating our planet through abortion, submitting yourself to climate agreements and carbon taxes, staying home, wearing a mask, gene therapy vaccines, and being a doormat for the World Economic Forum.
Could you explain 'eradicate politically' to me?
 

PureX

Veteran Member
Should the Democrat Party be "eradicated politically" off of the voter poll?

Some people might have the interesting, but rare perception that only Libertarians, Independents, People of No Political Affiliation, and Republicans can make "Good Decisions" on any political issues. However many Democrats claim that they make "Great Decisions" such as give 1/3 of your hard earned tax dollars back to the government, control by welfare, depopulating our planet through abortion, submitting yourself to climate agreements and carbon taxes, staying home, wearing a mask, gene therapy vaccines, and being a doormat for the World Economic Forum.
By that list, it appears the democrats do make some good policy decisions, while those who oppose them are just a bunch of selfish, short-sighted, infantile idiots.

But to answer the question, I would suggest we eliminate ALL parties from the ballots, and vote for individuals based on their merits.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Should the Democrat Party be "eradicated politically" off of the voter poll?

Some people might have the interesting, but rare perception that only Libertarians, Independents, People of No Political Affiliation, and Republicans can make "Good Decisions" on any political issues. However many Democrats claim that they make "Great Decisions" such as give 1/3 of your hard earned tax dollars back to the government, control by welfare, depopulating our planet through abortion, submitting yourself to climate agreements and carbon taxes, staying home, wearing a mask, gene therapy vaccines, and being a doormat for the World Economic Forum.
It should go the way of past political parties like the whigs and federalist parties for example.
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
Should the Democrat Party be "eradicated politically" off of the voter poll?

Some people might have the interesting, but rare perception that only Libertarians, Independents, People of No Political Affiliation, and Republicans can make "Good Decisions" on any political issues. However many Democrats claim that they make "Great Decisions" such as give 1/3 of your hard earned tax dollars back to the government, control by welfare, depopulating our planet through abortion, submitting yourself to climate agreements and carbon taxes, staying home, wearing a mask, gene therapy vaccines, and being a doormat for the World Economic Forum.

Those considerations would be good reasons to have a one party state based on liberal democratic principals.

Republican and similar corrupt parties need to be disbanded and disbarred.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Those considerations would be good reasons to have a one party state based on liberal democratic principals.

Republican and similar corrupt parties need to be disbanded and disbarred.
Ruling a one party state is a crime itself and needs to be forcefully addressed to prevent such a scenario from ever happening in any free society.
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
Perhaps America should take China as an example as to how to run a country and economy.
However China needs to be rather less Draconian when it comes to individual freedoms.
 

Friend of Mara

Active Member
Should the Democrat Party be "eradicated politically" off of the voter poll?

Some people might have the interesting, but rare perception that only Libertarians, Independents, People of No Political Affiliation, and Republicans can make "Good Decisions" on any political issues. However many Democrats claim that they make "Great Decisions" such as give 1/3 of your hard earned tax dollars back to the government, control by welfare, depopulating our planet through abortion, submitting yourself to climate agreements and carbon taxes, staying home, wearing a mask, gene therapy vaccines, and being a doormat for the World Economic Forum.
The best way to do this is for the voters to choose to do this. I would love for this to happen and the democrats cease to exist as a party and an actual progressive party replace them.
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
Ruling a one party state is a crime itself and needs to be forcefully addressed to prevent such a scenario from ever happening in any free society.

Why?
One party states in practice operate as elected individuals. A majority consensus is still needed to pass legislation.

In multiparty systems. It is still the party leaderships that decide how their members should vote.

In all cases selection committees decide which candidates can stand for that party. With out a party blessing no potential candidate stands any real chance of election. Rank and file voters have no measurable say in the matter.

In a majority of countries including The USA democracy is largely an illusion.j
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Why?
One party states in practice operate as elected individuals. A majority consensus is still needed to pass legislation.

In multiparty systems. It is still the party leaderships that decide how their members should vote.

In all cases selection committees decide which candidates can stand for that party. With out a party blessing no potential candidate stands any real chance of election. Rank and file voters have no measurable say in the matter.

In a majority of countries including The USA democracy is largely an illusion.j
Kind of defeats the whole point of voting if it's only one party, one voice, one mind.

All it takes is one look at countries like communist China or North Korea to see why.
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
The main reason we have two parties is that our voting system is usually winner take all. So if you eradicate one party you recreate it with a new name.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Should the Democrat Party be "eradicated politically" off of the voter poll?

Some people might have the interesting, but rare perception that only Libertarians, Independents, People of No Political Affiliation, and Republicans can make "Good Decisions" on any political issues. However many Democrats claim that they make "Great Decisions" such as give 1/3 of your hard earned tax dollars back to the government, control by welfare, depopulating our planet through abortion, submitting yourself to climate agreements and carbon taxes, staying home, wearing a mask, gene therapy vaccines, and being a doormat for the World Economic Forum.

The country has had numerous political problems emanating from both major parties and the corruption which exists at the upper tiers of political power. Eradicating political parties wouldn't make much of a difference, since the same people could just as easily form another political party under a different name.

Perhaps it might be better to change public perceptions as to what constitutes a "good decision."
 
Top