djhwoodwerks
Well-Known Member
Really? Can you turn water into wine?
No, why, can you?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Really? Can you turn water into wine?
No, why, can you?
No, I can't I was just commenting your phrase. If he is like us than we can do what he did, right? "He emptied Himself of all that made Him God and became exactly like us, "human"."
Matthew 17:19-20 (ESV Strong's) 19 Then the disciples came to Jesus privately and said, “Why could we not cast it out?” 20 He said to them, “Because of your little faith. For truly, I say to you, if you have faith like a grain of mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move, and nothing will be impossible for you.”
Mark 11:21-23 (ESV Strong's) 21 And Peter remembered and said to him, “Rabbi, look! The fig tree that you cursed has withered.” 22 And Jesus answered them, “Have faith in God. 23 Truly, I say to you, whoever says to this mountain, Be taken up and thrown into the sea,’ and does not doubt in his heart, but believes that what he says will come to pass, it will be done for him.
Hypostatic union states that Christ is fully God and fully human and it is a defined doctrine of the Chruch. Insofar as you reject that, you're heretical. Which may not mean all that much to you but alas, I'll stick with the Chalcedonian view thank you. (You don't get to make up your own theology and expect to be taken seriously by more orthodox Christians).Mary didn't give birth to God, or a God, she gave birth to a human named Jesus. He emptied Himself of all that made Him God and became exactly like us, "human".
Hypostatic union states that Christ is fully God and fully human and it is a defined doctrine of the Chruch. Insofar as you reject that, you're heretical. Which may not mean all that much to you but alas, I'll stick with the Chalcedonian view thank you. (You don't get to make up your own theology and expect to be taken seriously by more orthodox Christians).
(And not even those who rejected Chalcedon ever proposed anything close to what you're proposing).
The trinitarian doctrine asserts that Jesus the Son is distinct from God the Father. The Son is begotten before all ages, yet he incarnated at a specific time taking on a human nature. In no way did this detract from his complete divinity as God, so the Virgin Mary truly is the Mother of God.I believe 110% that God, the Father was "IN" Jesus on earth. I do not believe that Mary gave birth to "God", Who has always existed! To say that Mary gave birth to God, assumes that God had a beginning, which is false. There is only one God!
Jesus did nothing on earth which was not the will of the Father to do so. Remember that despite being eternal God, Jesus incarnated as fully human and thus as a human Jesus had to observe his human obligations before God the Father, whose covenant he came to fulfil. (Since who but God can redeem man back to God?). Baptism is necessary for inclusion into the New Covenant, which Christ came to establish. Thus as man Christ was baptised and began his ministry of the New Covenant.If Jesus was "born" God, why didn't (or couldn't) He do any miracles until He was anointed (baptized) to do so?
And where have I ever denied the humanity of Christ? This does not at all detract from Christ as fully God. I have stated numerous times, Jesus incarnated as man and became fully human. What you fail to grasp is that this human nature does not detract from his complete divinity and oneness with God. Jesus is God and man. He was always God, but took his humanity at the incarnation. God taking on our nature to redeem us before the Father on our behalf is humility beyond our comprehension. The Son not only became human, but he as God allowed himself to die at our hands in one of the most humiliating ways possible, as a common criminal. God himself in all his omnipotence and dignity suffered this for us.Philippians 2:5-8 (ESV Strong's) 5 Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, 6 who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, 7 but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. 8 And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.
Exactly like us? So we all can perform those kinds of miracles?Mary didn't give birth to God, or a God, she gave birth to a human named Jesus. He emptied Himself of all that made Him God and became exactly like us, "human".
so the Virgin Mary truly is the Mother of God.
Remember that despite being eternal God, Jesus incarnated as fully human
Jesus is God and man. He was always God, but took his humanity at the incarnation.
Caps aren't an argument.So, Mary "DID NOT" give birth to God, she gave birth to the "HUMAN" Jesus. What made the "HUMAN" Jesus God? If God is "eternal", and Jesus was "always" God, how could Mary give birth to God?
Isn't the Holy Spirit arguably female? I've seen information on that but it's been a while so I cant remember.
In fact trinities of gods, including father, mother, and son are common in pagan religions. Isis, Osiris, and Horus were an Egyptian triad. I do not believe the Bible teaches the trinity.I never understood why it was called the Father The Son and the Holy Spirit. I always felt Mary should have been included considering she is supposed to be sinless to Catholics and gave birth to the avatar of God.
I feel like there's no balance when women are taken out of the picture. and monotheistic faiths tend to be heavily male based. I never thought God or the creator was a man or woman but more of an it. But even then, in the trinity, I always thought it would make more sense to call it The Father, The Son and the Mother or The Father, The Mother and the Child. But then I guess they wouldn't be so monotheistic. Even then I thought it'd make more sense that way.
Isn't Catholicism crazy enough with all its saints and statues, phony relics and archaic rituals?Shouldn't the Trinity include Mary?
Caps aren't an argument.
Jesus is God.
Jesus never ceased being God, even as a man he was still God. (Hypostatic union)
Mary gave birth to Jesus.
Therefore Mary as the mother of Jesus, is the mother of God.
No one is claiming that Mary precedes Jesus, nor is anyone claiming that Mary is the source of Jesus' divinity. There is no "human" Jesus and "God" Jesus, but one person with two natures.
The Word was made flesh, not the reverse as you advocate. Mary preceded the incarnation of the Word, but not the Word himself.
Exactly like us? So we all can perform those kinds of miracles?
The trinitarian doctrine asserts that Jesus the Son is distinct from God the Father. The Son is begotten before all ages, yet he incarnated at a specific time taking on a human nature. In no way did this detract from his complete divinity as God, so the Virgin Mary truly is the Mother of God.
I also note while Jesus moved no mountain, Krishna couldMatthew 17:19-20 (ESV Strong's) 19 Then the disciples came to Jesus privately and said, “Why could we not cast it out?” 20 He said to them, “Because of your little faith. For truly, I say to you, if you have faith like a grain of mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move, and nothing will be impossible for you.”
Not even Jesus did it.yep....How many believers have been able to do the same?
Why does God only want Jesus to perform random parlor tricks and do little of mind-blowing value?Jesus did nothing on earth which was not the will of the Father to do so
Rituals are made to satiate man, not man to satiate ritual.Baptism is necessary for inclusion into the New Covenant, which Christ came to establish. Thus as man Christ was baptised and began his ministry of the New Covenant.
I never understood why it was called the Father The Son and the Holy Spirit. I always felt Mary should have been included considering she is supposed to be sinless to Catholics and gave birth to the avatar of God.
I feel like there's no balance when women are taken out of the picture. and monotheistic faiths tend to be heavily male based. I never thought God or the creator was a man or woman but more of an it. But even then, in the trinity, I always thought it would make more sense to call it The Father, The Son and the Mother or The Father, The Mother and the Child. But then I guess they wouldn't be so monotheistic. Even then I thought it'd make more sense that way.