I told that jack*** I would NOT be answering his ridiculous questions - as many have noticed - all he seeks to do is undermine other faiths without examining his own - I am not willing to engage with that
I have challenged him before and as
@danieldemol says - he ignores answers and speaks in a circular language
Let me tell you once and for all - the SGGS is collection of poems and hymns from different individuals regarded as holy and and as worshippers of the lord in whatever form - there is reference to Allah (Shaikh Fareed) and Narayan (Naamdev) and both (Kabir) as well as those of the 5 individuals out of the 9 that followed Nanak - it is not predictive of future events nor a history book by any stretch of imagination
I call Sikhism a philosophy based on Adwaita Vedanta and the vast majority of the SGGS is a confirmation of that if one takes it in context
Like
@Vinayaka said you will not find "claims" about anything unlike Mirza Ahmad - and
@paarsurrey - you are
wrong about the fact that he did not have disciples in his time - look up Bhai Bala (a hindu) and Bhai Mardana (a Muslim) - do your bl**** research before posting unfounded statements
The Guru's were humble to the point where the 10th Guru Gobind Singh had this to say:
Jo Hum Ko Parmeshwar Uchar Hai
Tay Sabh Narak Kund Mah Par Hai
Mo Ko Daas Tavan Kaa Jaano
Yaa Mai Bhed Na Runch Pachhaano
Mai Ho Param Purkh Ko Daasa
Dekhan Aayo Jagat Tamaasa
(Bachittar Natak)
Those who address me as God
Shall fall into the pit of hell.
Treat me as a servant of the Lord
And entertain no doubt about it.
I am only a slave of the Lord. I have
only come to witness the Lord's play (Lila).
I am done with you - you are going on my "ignore" list
That is an incredibly arrogant, ignorant and immodest statement not to speak of openly proselytizing
You do not ask someone that has everything they want to go looking for something else is why
Because Guru Nanak came first and said whatever there was to say - the question IMO should be reversed "Why should anyone follow Baha'u'llah - when all he said was already said - answer that first - what is "new and revolutionary" about what Baha'u'llah said that the dharmic faiths do not already have. Give me one point -
just one - if you can - else I shall accept the fact that you are misguided and indoctrinated and a not-so-sly proselytizer at that or at best a hypocrite.
The Sikhs had 10 Guru's to refine and hone the philosophy to a sharp needle that cuts through Maya if followed correctly. What did the charlatan that you follow do?
Proclaim himself to be the return of x y and z - yes in India we call them frauds and charlatans
The Sikh philosophy is pretty simple - 3 tenets anyone can follow
1. Kirit Karo (work hard and honestly)
2. Wand Shako (share what you have with other fellow creatures)
3. Naam Japo (remember the lord)
So why should I leave a faith that is the pure distillation of Adwaita and "accept Baha'u'llah" who I regard as nothing more than a faker and a fraud?
