Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Well, I do think that apart from those two scenes I mentioned, it was pretty good. Creepy and uncomfortable. Graphic depictions of violence just ruin movies for me. One scene like that, for me, is enough to put me off the whole thing. I disliked reservoir dogs simply because of the cop scene, for example.
Another thing that can put me off a whole movie is graphic rape scene.
Aw. I like I suspenseful scary movies, but I hate those that have humans being evil to humans just for the torture/gore factor (Hostel was perhaps the worst movie I have ever seen; it still makes my skin crawl just thinking about it.) So I guess I won't be putting this on my to-watch list.
Aw. I like I suspenseful scary movies, but I hate those that have humans being evil to humans just for the torture/gore factor (Hostel was perhaps the worst movie I have ever seen; it still makes my skin crawl just thinking about it.) So I guess I won't be putting this on my to-watch list.
Hostel was an Eli Roth film who much like Sam Raimi creates his "horror" films for humorous effect. Constant use of gore amplifies this. If you are expecting some scary film it won't deliver but gore has its own rightful place which is usually humor. I believe the main issue is that people are expecting horror from the wrong kind of movies and Hollywood is not helping. Slash films are not horror and films often blur this line by expecting a gory and violent movie to function as a horror film. PG13 movies like Juon remain truly scary despite their lack of violence.
Now I am craving some human flesh! Muhahaha :devil:
If anyone thinks burning out someone's eye with a blowtorch is humorous, then I think that opens a whole nother suite of issues.
I personally like the first movie. I think people generally "fanboy" too much when it comes to adaptations (as well as remakes) that they refuse to objectively give something a chance when it deviates too much from the original source.
I never saw the second one.
Never really played the games so can't comment how the film compares to them (never liked the Resident Evil style gameplay, just can't quite gel with it) but I was a fan of the first film. Not seen the second one, but would like to.
If anyone thinks burning out someone's eye with a blowtorch is humorous, then I think that opens a whole nother suite of issues.
Silent Hill is NOTHING like Resident Evil. The camera is not a problem (most of the time), and you can choose whether you want the tank controls of RE, or more standard 3D controls, which is how I play.
I was a fan of RE for quite some time. Recently playing through the SH games, from a gameplay perspective, SH is MUCH better.
it's only humorous if its exaggerated to the point of ridiculous
Fair enough, it's some time ago since I played either and to my young mind they seemed to play the same way. Might give silent hill 2 a go at some point though since I only played the first game.
Haven't seen Braindead, but to me, it conjures up old Warner Bros. cartoons.the braindead/dead alive approach
Utterly disgusting film and made me queasy in places (mother's ear dropping off into her dinner) but also incredibly funny.
I did not like Silent Hill 2, I did end up watching it, and it was horrible