Sluts are no different than studs

[Galateasdream]

Men, (most men) like to mark there territory and that means having plentiful supply of willing women. However what they dont want is for the women they can feel they own, wife, girlfriend, mother, sister, aunty, close female friends etc to be willing. I.e Those they believe to be their property.

Fair enough.
Why do they like this?

 

[ChristineM]

Fair enough.
Why do they like this?

I would say jealousy but i don't really know, ask a man.

 

[Galateasdream]

I would say jealousy but i don't really know, ask a man.

Do you think, given this seems somewhat universal, that it might be something hardwired in terms of evolutionary heritage?

 

[ChristineM]

Do you think, given this seems somewhat universal, that it might be something hardwired in terms of evolutionary heritage?

Interesting. Like the guy likes to cast his seed far and wide but wants to be sure he is his father's son and his partners children are his children.

It could be hard wired but then why is it not universal, why are so many animals not wired the same way. If its evolutionary then it is a fairly recent trait.

 

[Galateasdream]

why is it not universal

But didn't you say most men?
It strikes me as being pretty universal in human males.
I don't know about other primates.

 

[ChristineM]

But didn't you say most men?
It strikes me as being pretty universal in human males.
I don't know about other primates.

I know several males who do not have the jealousy bone.

Also some cultures

 

[Galateasdream]

I know several males who do not have the jealousy bone.

And I know several women who don't want children.
So what, lol

 

[Iymus]

First off, a **** is guilty of the same crime as a stud. If a man gets to brag about being a stud, then a woman has just as much reason for bragging about being a s***, no?

I prefer people don't have lots of partners and learn the virtues of chastity and purity, but

Jesus was criticized for hanging out excessively with sluts and whores and his first public miracle was to get people more drunk and partying harder on a highly addictive drug that makes people sexually promiscuous.

No doubt he wasn't frightened or scandalized by a woman who enjoys sex even with multiple partners, for he was quite well aware that King Solomon was the wisest man on Earth , and he had sex with hundreds of wives and concubines. He must have had multiple new partners every day of the year. I bet they had some wild orgies.

At work all my co workers seem to obsess about and get excited about is sex, one of them has 17 kids, they gawk at women and brag about their sex-life. I'm guilty as well, which is why it is hypocritical if I condemn a **** in thought, word, and deed.

I've only been with impoverished and often troubled women and cannot brag about being a stud, but if I was, no doubt I would brag about it, have feelings of pride about it.

When a complete stranger returned to his apartment and caught me in bed with his girl (just giving her a backrub but still) I woke up the next morning with an amusing story to share with family and friends, followed by someone telling me "if you don't stay away from Dreya, you will be killed."

When an obese black girl at an IRTS facility who couldn't get in bed with me got me too drunk and stoned to walk, walked me to my room, laid me down on the bed and date-raped me, I woke up laughing and called my brother to share a funny story. No shame, guilt, or trauma.

Guys can brag about stuff like that. Why can't women?

I'm trying to twist everything the Antichrist does, pervert it, and make it so it no longer offends God. So, I believe the Anti-antichrist will have a "Whore of Babylon" to get the nation's intoxicated, but Jesus was a friend of whores, so can love a humble prostitute no doubt.

It's against God's rules, but Jacob had to break God's rules in order to steal Esau's blessing and destiny, then fight with God to become Israel, and God rewarded him with the greatest blessing, and all Jews descend from Jacob. You can break God's rules and be rewarded for it if you do it the right way.

Anyhow, I see no difference between **** or stud, as they are guilty of the same thing, and why was only the woman brought to Christ to be stoned ,and not the man who was with her?

When I become ill Duce, I'll outlaw **** shaming. There will be none of that on my watch.

Female ferrets can actually die from not having enough sex.

Your post seems highly problematic.

1. What a man values in a woman is not the same as what a woman values in a man . In order to be considered the same we would have to value each other the same way.

2. If a woman chooses to be a **** she should not expect the same value and validation that a man sees in a non ****.

3. Also man has sex externally and a woman has sex internally.

Much more to cover but would only get a further headache so will leave it here.

 

[ChristineM]

And I know several women who don't want children.
So what, lol

So it's not universal, thats what

 

[Galateasdream]

So it's not universal, thats what

Ah, if you think I was using universal to mean literally universal you'd be wrong.

But I can't be bothered to have a silly debate right now.

 

[Iymus]

If I understood male psyche correctly, males want to play the predator role to be aroused.

If this is the case not sure how you got that interpretation from my response. Clarification would be needed.

Meaning...a nympho turns them off, because a woman who restlessly feels a void between her legs makes them feel inadequate. Or incapable to satisfy them.

Turns them off when it comes to building a family along with passing down a legacy and generational wealth. Also higher chances of diseases. But perhaps what you said could be adequate along with used tend to depreciate faster along with higher in maintenance.

Au contraire, a reluctant, neglecting woman with low sex drives turns them on because she is more compatible with a prey.

More clarity please.

Also I am unable to quote your last piece however I am under the impression that men are attracted to women in general and lesbians are still women. Perhaps certain attractive lesbians are valued more because harder to obtain.

 

[ChristineM]

Ah, if you think I was using universal to mean literally universal you'd be wrong.

But I can't be bothered to have a silly debate right now.

I was using universal to mean all in the group. As in the meaning of the word. I set a great deal of faith in definition, it saves confusion

 

[Galateasdream]

I was using universal to mean all in the group. As in the meaning of the word. I set a great deal of faith in definition, it saves confusion

Yeah, I like being aware of context of usage. Lol

 

[ChristineM]

Yeah, I like being aware of context of usage. Lol

The context was

It strikes me as being pretty universal in human males.

 

[Galateasdream]

The context was

Yes. I know.

Clearly we read the context of our conversation differently. I do tthink I've ever had a philosophical or politcial conversation where universal in terms of human social constructs literally meant every single human ever with no exceptions. It just isn't used that way, in my experience.

 

[ChristineM]

Yes. I know.

Clearly we read the context of our conversation differently. I do tthink I've ever had a philosophical or politcial conversation where universal in terms of human social constructs literally meant every single human ever with no exceptions. It just isn't used that way, in my experience.

As i said, definition saves confusion

 

[Galateasdream]

As i said, definition saves confusion

Guess we should have defined terms before beginning outr conversation. Oh well, you live and learn. Next time you talk to me please provide exhaustive etymological and philosophical dictionary definitions for every possible term, lol

 

[ChristineM]

Guess we should have defined terms before beginning outr conversation. Oh well, you live and learn. Next time you talk to me please provide exhaustive etymological and philosophical dictionary definitions for every possible term, lol

Or try the OED, much easier because people cannot read minds

 

[Galateasdream]

Or try the OED, much easier because people cannot read minds

OED doesn't explain all social contexts, does it? And the OED is an etymological dictionary.
Anyway, next time we talk please provide etymological heritage and specialist philosophical definitions for each key term along with presumed context of usage

 

[ChristineM]

OED doesn't explain all social contexts, does it? And the OED is an etymological dictionary.
Anyway, next time we talk please provide etymological heritage and specialist philosophical definitions for each key term along with presumed context of usage

The definition is far better than guessing