GoodbyeDave
Well-Known Member
Any sensible classification has a purpose, so different purposes need different classifications. To a biologist, an octopus is not a fish, but people who catch octopuses are fishermen and the people who sell them are fishmongers.
I can see the reasoning behind the reclassification of Pluto, although I think the question of long-term orbital stability should be involved in the definition of a planet. Unfortunately, that's a bit hard to predict!
Luckily for me, I deal with planets as an astrologer, not an astronomer. If you need it in a chart for accurate results, it's a planet. Thanks to Pluto, astrologers predicted the collapse of the USSR a decade before it happened, which no-one else managed. On that basis, Pluto is in; Ceres, Chiron, and the like are out.
I can see the reasoning behind the reclassification of Pluto, although I think the question of long-term orbital stability should be involved in the definition of a planet. Unfortunately, that's a bit hard to predict!
Luckily for me, I deal with planets as an astrologer, not an astronomer. If you need it in a chart for accurate results, it's a planet. Thanks to Pluto, astrologers predicted the collapse of the USSR a decade before it happened, which no-one else managed. On that basis, Pluto is in; Ceres, Chiron, and the like are out.