sandandfoam
Veteran Member
It seems to me that social justice is integral to Islam. Is this how you read it?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I imagine this thread will quickly descend into the realm of "way back when the four Caliph ruled with utter authority..." No doubt the lack of social justice in Muslim countries will be laid at our feet due to our unrelenting oppression of the "perfect" religion. Though, I could be wrong.There is as much poverty and oppression in Muslim states as anywhere else.
Perhaps this is because there is as much greed.
Both Christianity and Islam have fine intentions, however neither have lead to universal social justice.
A Tariq Ramadanesque question... That IS the idea, however the idea also begs the question of what one considers justice. Is it the kind of justice one would really want governing their lives?It seems to me that social justice is integral to Islam. Is this how you read it?
It seems to me that social justice is integral to Islam. Is this how you read it?
Hi Terry,There is as much poverty and oppression in Muslim states as anywhere else.
Perhaps this is because there is as much greed.
Again I agree, however I think that this is so because of the message. Do you?Both Christianity and Islam have fine intentions, however neither have lead to universal social justice
I think most people would argue that their religion is for social justice. But then you have to ask, what is social justice according to that religion? Does it include burning witches? Because some would argue so...
A Tariq Ramadanesque question... That IS the idea, however the idea also begs the question of what one considers justice. Is it the kind of justice one would really want governing their lives?
I read it like this,Islam has social justice relating to the Medaeval mind from the time of its inception.
Hi England,
How do you think a medieval mind is different from a modern one?
It seems to me that social justice is integral to Islam. Is this how you read it?
Social justice is integral to humanism, in Islam there is autocracy and submission.It seems to me that social justice is integral to Islam. Is this how you read it?
Why is it that a rather healthy number of Muslims consider democracy, civil rights, and free speech to be either irrelevant or unIslamic?Now, regarding social justice, it's an integral part of Islam because without it we won't have a healthy and prospering society to live and grow at.
A false statement, submission to God perhaps submission to rulers never. Anyone with a modicum of knowledge of Islamic rule of law, including the Rashidun, can quite clearly understand the concept of barring those who seek power from positions of rule, election by consultation, governance by consent and a revolving concept of social justice. To rewrite the humility and humbleness of the Caliphs of Islam as unweilding power mongers is an hilarious revisit to the works of the Orientalists and their fascination with the rule of the Khalifa. Only in Islam will you find that the leaders of the state live and die within what can only be referred to as poverty.Social justice is integral to humanism, in Islam there is autocracy and submission.
No you don't.In both the Quran and Bible ,for example,we see Slavery as acceptable
The legal bondage placed upon those people cannot be termed as "slavery" by any means and are much closer to an alternate system of the modern day penitentiary and much more successful.People who own Slaves in the Bible and Qur'an have legal obligations to them,this in itself is acceptance of the practice.
The legal bondage placed upon those people cannot be termed as "slavery" by any means and are much closer to an alternate system of the modern day penitentiary and much more successful.
Except for the fact that the "slave" was given an option towards freedom, the state sponsored the freeing of slaves through its own public charity, Islam focuses on freeing these "slaves" and the high merit of doing so, former "slaves" within an Islamic context never fulfilled the stereotypes found everywhere else in the world and were treated as citizens of the state, and the only people who were made slaves were those engaged in active warfare, often guilty of condemnable torture. If anything a Prisoner of War is an accurate label, the term slave just reveals your agenda.Why not,Slavery is a good description of what it is
Except for the fact that the "slave" was given an option towards freedom, the state sponsored the freeing of slaves through its own public charity, Islam focuses on freeing these "slaves" and the high merit of doing so, former "slaves" within an Islamic context never fulfilled the stereotypes found everywhere else in the world and were treated as citizens of the state, and the only people who were made slaves were those engaged in active warfare, often guilty of condemnable torture. If anything a Prisoner of War is an accurate label, the term slave just reveals your agenda.