• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Socialist Democrats will not keep illegals in declared sanctuary citys. GOP passes ban in FLA.

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Even though I'm mostly liberal, illegal immigration is an issue I don't swing left on. Of course you cannot allow anyone to enter without any sort of vetting or documentation process. That said, migrants should be treated with empathy and pity rather than with disdain and resentment. They're mostly families desperately seeking to escape a life of violence and poverty.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
The Ministry of Truth has put out the word that socialism is an evil word which must be used to describe the left.
 

Jumi

Well-Known Member
Even though I'm mostly liberal, illegal immigration is an issue I don't swing left on. Of course you cannot allow anyone to enter without any sort of vetting or documentation process. That said, migrants should be treated with empathy and pity rather than with disdain and resentment. They're mostly families desperately seeking to escape a life of violence and poverty.
Yes and isn't it interesting that immigration is left versus right only by country and time period. Many right-wing argue for cheap labor from poorer countries even if it means illegal immigrants. Many people funding right-wing use that labor so they don't have to pay the locals as much and it's a good reason to drive wages and costs down. For similar reasons some left-wing are opposed to it.

In my country we had two communist parties (with around 0% support mind you), one was a workers party arguing for immigration limits and the other was for open borders.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Yes and isn't it interesting that immigration is left versus right only by country and time period. Many right-wing argue for cheap labor from poorer countries even if it means illegal immigrants. Many people funding right-wing use that labor so they don't have to pay the locals as much and it's a good reason to drive wages and costs down. For similar reasons some left-wing are opposed to it.
A lot of those on the right would love cheap, exploitable labor, but they can't get pocketed politicians elected without the votes of the blue collar working class.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
Even though I'm mostly liberal, illegal immigration is an issue I don't swing left on. Of course you cannot allow anyone to enter without any sort of vetting or documentation process. That said, migrants should be treated with empathy and pity rather than with disdain and resentment. They're mostly families desperately seeking to escape a life of violence and poverty.
My parents were such people. They were fleeing persecution and poverty and dictatorship (communism).

We need to keep criminals out but attacking as evil those who are looking for a better life for their family and are willing to work hard is to me indirectly an attack on my parents who came here with no English, almost no money but with a willingness to work hard and make a better life for me.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
My parents were such people. They were fleeing persecution and poverty and dictatorship (communism).

We need to keep criminals out but attacking as evil those who are looking for a better life for their family and are willing to work hard is to me indirectly an attack on my parents who came here with no English, almost no money but with a willingness to work hard and make a better life for me.
It's as if many of these proclaimed "patriots" had forgotten their own roots and the inscription upon The Statue of Liberty.
 

Mindmaster

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
The Ministry of Truth has put out the word that socialism is an evil word which must be used to describe the left.

Except that the leftists that identify themselves as socialists completely, like Bernie and Antifa. :D There isn't much difference between "social democrat" and socialist, if you read the ink on their pages. As far as the "Ministry of Truth" that only exists in the context of the liberal media as no one else has that much control of the platform to disseminate their message. Pardon me, if I don't drink the k00l-aid.

The only Democrats not down with the socialist moniker are in hotly contested districts where such a title would put off the locals.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
My parents were such people. They were fleeing persecution and poverty and dictatorship (communism).

We need to keep criminals out but attacking as evil those who are looking for a better life for their family and are willing to work hard is to me indirectly an attack on my parents who came here with no English, almost no money but with a willingness to work hard and make a better life for me.
Did they pretty much jump the fence, waltzed in, and thumbed their noses at the authorities saying, "I dont need no stinkin application and screening process. Catch me if you can".
 

Jumi

Well-Known Member
Except that the leftists that identify themselves as socialists completely, like Bernie and Antifa. :D
Antifa isn't a person(or democrat) and they include people who aren't socialist, like anarchists. Bernie might call himself a socialist, but then again he makes the mistake of calling Scandinavia socialist which we are not on government level. Like the democrats in general have false ideas about the Nordic model, but not quite as false as many of your country's "right-wing" representations of us.

There isn't much difference between "social democrat" and socialist, if you read the ink on their pages. As far as the "Ministry of Truth" that only exists in the context of the liberal media as no one else has that much control of the platform to disseminate their message. Pardon me, if I don't drink the k00l-aid.
There's a lot of difference between social democrat and communist, in my country the Social Democrats allied with Americans during the cold war because they were known for being stricly anti-communist. It would be quite funny to see someone believing all the weird word equations politicians these days make try to read some history.

The only Democrats not down with the socialist moniker are in hotly contested districts where such a title would put off the locals.
And those who aren't socialist, right?
 

Jumi

Well-Known Member
It's as if many of these proclaimed "patriots" had forgotten their own roots and the inscription upon The Statue of Liberty.
I'd say what's interesting is how both democrats and republicans swing on the authoritarian side instead of libertarian, yet speak about "freedom" as a value that's disconnected from liberty.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
I'd say what's interesting is how both democrats and republicans swing on the authoritarian side instead of libertarian, yet speak about "freedom" as a value that's disconnected from liberty.
Americans like to bellow loudly about freedom until it comes to anything "immoral" (cannabis, prostitution, gay marriage, etc.)
 

Audie

Veteran Member
My parents were such people. They were fleeing persecution and poverty and dictatorship (communism).

We need to keep criminals out but attacking as evil those who are looking for a better life for their family and are willing to work hard is to me indirectly an attack on my parents who came here with no English, almost no money but with a willingness to work hard and make a better life for me.
Does someone do that?
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Did they pretty much jump the fence, waltzed in, and thumbed their noses at the authorities saying, "I dont need no stinkin application and screening process. Catch me if you can".

Mom and I came in through the front door,
did everything correctly. It is quite a process.

I have relatives in line, where they have waited
for years.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Yes and isn't it interesting that immigration is left versus right only by country and time period. Many right-wing argue for cheap labor from poorer countries even if it means illegal immigrants. Many people funding right-wing use that labor so they don't have to pay the locals as much and it's a good reason to drive wages and costs down. For similar reasons some left-wing are opposed to it.

In my country we had two communist parties (with around 0% support mind you), one was a workers party arguing for immigration limits and the other was for open borders.

I never really saw immigration, in and of itself, as a right vs. left issue. As you say, it depends on the country and time period, as well as the motives for immigrating and the country of origin. A defector from a communist country was generally welcomed with open arms by the right-wing. When the freedom flotilla arrived from Cuba, they were allowed to enter.

As long as it makes US adversaries look bad, then immigration is okay from a right-wing point of view.

On the other hand, when they come from countries which are considered US allies (Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, etc.), then it's looked at differently. Those countries are US allies and considered capitalist paradises, so why would anyone in their right mind want to leave such a wonderful place? That's why the right-wing tends to paint them as they do, since they can't possibly be escaping persecution or oppression - since that would make US allies look bad, and it would make US foreign policy appear disingenuous. Can't have any of that.
 
Top