Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I don't know..I had a cat at 5 years old (and he was not a "sick" or weak cat) Moon....that was prey to a coyote.I will never know if he could have escaped them (coyotes cant climb) if he had had his front claws.I certainly didn't do him any favors.
Guilt never ceases.
Declawing handicaps a cat. It interferes with hunting, climbing and manipulation of things.Also, I'm pro-declawing. I don't see how it's any worse than spaying or neutering
An owner should take care that a declawed cat (i.e. an 'indoor' cat) doesn't find itself in those positions.Declawing handicaps a cat. It interferes with hunting, climbing and manipulation of things.
An owner should take care that a declawed cat (i.e. an 'indoor' cat) doesn't find itself in those positions.
How about we snip the tips of your fingers off? It's not really entirely the same, since humans do not have claws as a natural first line of defense, but it is about the closest comparable thing there is. Cats are supposed to claw, scratch, climb, and they are born to hunt. If you take away their claws you are putting them into a position that they simply are not supposed to be in. They become handicapped and practically defenseless, they are unable to satisfy their natural inclinations, and it is only the selfish human that benefits from not having the carpet clawed, compared to the cat who suffers the loss of a very important part of their anatomy (perhaps a total penectomy and orchidectomy would be more comparable?).What was the first thing?
Also, I'm pro-declawing. I don't see how it's any worse than spaying or neutering.
I wouldn't confuse excessive and arbitrary laws as being "advanced".
If you don't want to take that chance, then don't get a cat. It's really no different than a kid. If you absolutely cannot stand the thought of your stuff being ruined, then don't have them. If you wouldn't be able to handle it if something got chewed, then don't get a dog. Pet ownership is called a responsibility for a reason.A scratching post is a good, natural way to wear down claws. The issue is getting the little turds to use one rather than your furniture.
That is much easier said than done. Cats are very sneaky, very cleaver, and often times very persistent. Again, much like a child, all it takes is having your eyes turned away for a second.An owner should take care that a declawed cat (i.e. an 'indoor' cat) doesn't find itself in those positions.
Declawing handicaps a cat. It interferes with hunting, climbing and manipulation of things.
Spaying/neutering benefits the individual cat. It reduces such dangerous practices as roaming, fighting, &c.
If you don't want to take that chance, then don't get a cat. It's really no different than a kid. If you absolutely cannot stand the thought of your stuff being ruined, then don't have them.
Every time we come back home, our cat gets happy and claws it. But it's a minor issue, it's better that he's happy and healthy. It's illegal in the UK to declaw, animal laws are more strict and advanced here, compared to Canada (where I'm from) or US.
So, he seems to have emotional problems, sounds like it could be from declawing
Really, what can you expect? Other countries have outlawed certain animal growth hormones, certain additives in cosmetics, but here in America I guess we like to pretend that if it's bad for you (or others) then it really must be good for you because you can't trust those pesky scientist who are out to destroy everything good and decent. What do they know if a growth hormone makes cows horribly ill and gives people cancer as long as the free market is involved, and why should we even bother to think how cruel and barbaric we are to those we call family as long as the free market reigns supreme?Exert..
Most pet-friendly nations already outlaw onychectomy. The United Kingdom's Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons deems the procedure "not acceptable" under most circumstances, and laws in most European countries explicitly prohibit it. In Israel, declawing a cat can result in a fine of 75,000 shekels — more than $20,000. Authorities in Brazil, Japan, Turkey and Australia also frown on the practice.
Yet in the United States, declawing is still a common — and lucrative — part of the veterinary business. A surgery that's now considered too barbaric for wild animals is widely marketed through coupons and special spay-neuter "package deals" to cat lovers of all stripes. Studies indicate that 22 million cats, about one-fourth of the country's total domesticated feline population, have been declawed. On average, vets charge between $400 and $800 for the surgery, which takes less than 10 minutes per paw and can be done with a scalpel, laser or guillotine-type trimmer.
How about we snip the tips of your fingers off?
That's the emotional, knee-jerk reaction I like to see.
By that logic we shouldn't own any pets, considering we ourselves would never want to be spayed or neutered, be put on a tether or leash, kept in a cage or pin, eat or drink out of a dish on the floor, or be subjected to anything else that we subject our pets to.
I just ate chicken
. Granted, it's not exactly necessary, but, there are better things to worry about.
I find it rather comical to label declawing barbaric. G
Really, what can you expect? Other countries have outlawed certain animal growth hormones, certain additives in cosmetics, but here in America I guess we like to pretend that if it's bad for you (or others) then it really must be good for you because you can't trust those pesky scientist who are out to destroy everything good and decent. What do they know if a growth hormone makes cows horribly ill and gives people cancer as long as the free market is involved, and why should we even bother to think how cruel and barbaric we are to those we call family as long as the free market reigns supreme?
That's the emotional, knee-jerk reaction I like to see.
By that logic we shouldn't own any pets, considering we ourselves would never want to be spayed or neutered, be put on a tether or leash, kept in a cage or pin, eat or drink out of a dish on the floor, or be subjected to anything else that we subject our pets to.