• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Spiritual but not religious and crime

Kilgore Trout

Misanthropic Humanist
Off the top of my head, it might have something to do with the fact that people who are "spiritual but not religious" generally tend to seem somewhat flaky and a bit off.
 

tumbleweed41

Resident Liberal Hippie
I notice the focus was on property crimes, which can include everything from graffiti to grand theft auto.
I would be interested in the specifics on the severity of the crimes and who among those studied are more likely to commit crimes of violence against a person.
 

Gjallarhorn

N'yog-Sothep
When you hold yourself to your own standards, you can do almost anything you want.

Off the top of my head, it might have something to do with the fact that people who are "spiritual but not religious" generally tend to seem somewhat flaky and a bit off.
And what he said.
 

Yerda

Veteran Member
Do I need to?

If you make your own rules, you can break your own rules and feel less guilty than letting others down. That help?
These spiritual but not religious folks are breaking societies rules more freely because they live by their own?
 

satori8

Member
Well technically atheists could be said the only repercussions are from the law. But why would a spiritual but not religious person, if they believe in a deity, not fear repercussions from both the law, as well as a deity? It seems the Christians are obeying the law, they speculate because they fear the repercussions. So is interesting the young believe in something, but perhaps they don't fear it?
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
It does not surprise me.

"Spiritual but not religious" often means a belief in some sort of higher purpose coupled with a belief that other people's understanding of same is not to be trusted.

Of all belief stances, that is probably the one most easily twisted into self-justification and lack of proper moral questioning.

I would expect the quantitative difference not to be too extreme, though. Many religious groups are simply not all that effective at avoiding self-justification.

(...) But why would a spiritual but not religious person, if they believe in a deity, not fear repercussions from both the law, as well as a deity?

Because he decides what that deity wants, and interprets it as being favorable to his personal desires.


It seems the Christians are obeying the law, they speculate because they fear the repercussions. So is interesting the young believe in something, but perhaps they don't fear it?

Why would they? It is not like there is anything clearly indicating that their conceptions of god or religion are misguided.
 
Last edited:
Top