dybmh
דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
there is one that i guard as my own soul
^^^ Dualism ^^^
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
there is one that i guard as my own soul
that spark, that ember that every soul carries from the oversoul within it's beingWhich one? I don't know Biblical passages, but am happy to read if you'll share it.
Ah! Finally! A song we both like.
We have markedly different tastes in music.
to be as wise as serpent and innocent as doves ultimately playing within the dualists vision and you are correct, it is defeating the serpent. like george and the dragon, like platos dark/white horse in the charioteer. the idea is that the energy can't be destroy, it can only be redirected into a greater wayAgreed. Those are extremes. Rare.
From the non-dual perspective there are no leaders at all. There is no team. Your question is again, self defeating.
oneness my own soul, spirit^^^ Dualism ^^^
Ah, that dragon... hell of a bite, I tell you.to be as wise as serpent and innocent as doves ultimately playing within the dualists vision and you are correct, it is defeating the serpent. like george and the dragon, like platos dark/white horse in the charioteer. the idea is that the energy can't be destroy, it can only be redirected into a greater way
to be as wise as serpent and innocent as doves ultimately playing within the dualists vision and you are correct, it is defeating the serpent. like george and the dragon, like platos dark/white horse in the charioteer. the idea is that the energy can't be destroy, it can only be redirected into a greater way
Ok.... I don't disagree. What does this have to do with this thread?
If there is a team, it's Dualism.
If there is a leader, it's Dualism.
If there are others, it's Dualism.
Your premise requires Dualism.
Agreed?
yin and yang.
inextricably intertwined
nope they are one thing alluding that there is separation. they who can name the dao is not the eternal dao.. that is a singularity, not a pluralityYin and yang is dualism. You are welcome to disagree. No one will agree with you in the Daoism community. Only syncretists doing mental gymnastics think the Taiji is non-dual.
Its not so much 'take whatever', but recognizing the potential to learn can come from anyone, anywhere, at any time.
Not that I'd accept them as a guru, so to speak, but recognize a lesson when it comes.
You can learn from negative role models, too. How not to be. What not to do.
![]()
nope they are one thing
at third density that would seem to be the case but the all occupies all space/time. there is no left/right, no inner/outward, no up/down. that which isn't created can't be obliviated.Things...
The "things" you are referring to are one thing made of 3 components. Remove any of the three, the entire construct collapses.
Below are three distinct examples of mutually dependent dual "things"
Each of these dual "things" have 3 necessary components: 2 extremes and the connection which is defining them both. Remove any one of these three? Oblivion.
- Left << connecting to >> Right
- Up << connecting to >> Down
- Inner << connecting to >> Outer
You like oblivion?
You are looking for company?
You feel alone?
Open your eyes