• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

SR-71 Blackbird

Onyx

Active Member
Premium Member
The SR-71 was a remarkable plane. Lockheed has a great article about it:
Creating The Blackbird

SR-71_XL_01a.jpg


Another article with more pictures:
Facts You Didn’t Know About the SR-71 Blackbird

The flight manual was declassified a while back:
SR-71 Online - SR-71 Flight Manual

It's been a few years since I used it, but the FlightGear simulator has a nice SR-71 model, with the landing chute and everything:
Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird - FlightGear wiki
 
Last edited:

Nietzsche

The Last Prussian
Premium Member
The SR-71 was a remarkable plane. Lockheed has a great article about it:
Creating The Blackbird

View attachment 15759

Another article with more pictures:
Facts You Didn’t Know About the SR-71 Blackbird

The flight manual was declassified a while back:
SR-71 Online - SR-71 Flight Manual

It's been a few years since I used it, but the FlightGear simulator has a nice SR-71 model, with the landing chute and everything:
Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird - FlightGear wiki
I did not know NASA had their own paintjob and ****. That F-16 looks so damn cool with it.
 

Onyx

Active Member
Premium Member
The takeoff/climb procedures are interesting. The plane's engines basically become ramjets after mach 1.0. (See "area for transonic accel" in the chart below, link provided as a starting point for further reading.)

Wasn't the MiG 25 supposed to be a counter to the SR 71?

I don't know much about the MIG-25, perhaps a new thread is in order for that. There was a forerunner to the SR-71 with missiles onboard (YF-12 prototype), but I think the general design was used most profitably as a spy-plane.

At first glance, some differences I see are that the SR-71 was mostly titanium, while the MIG-25 was stainless steel (with some silver-plated steel in the engines?). Also, the SR-71 appears to have had a higher sustained speed. Will look into it more.

From SR-71 Online - SR-71 Flight Manual: Section 2, Page 2-40:
sr71_climb.png
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Wasn't the MiG 25 supposed to be a counter to the SR 71?
They had entirely different roles.
The SR-71 is a spy plane with no armament.
The Foxbat could surveil, but also carried missiles.
This resulted in design compromises, which (along with others) limited both top & cruising speed.

Ref....
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25 - Wikipedia
Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird - Wikipedia

Design philosophies differed between Americastan & Evil Ivan.
The former was more technologically advanced (eg, using titanium instead of easier to work steel),
but Ivan accomplished remarkable things with sophisticated use of less advanced resources.
 
Last edited:
Top