Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It can be difficult to see them in the right perspective.Ya know, that movie really changed my attitude towards cyclopes...
Just say'n
But if we are going to do 'nothing new under the sun' then LotR is basically a lititurized version of Wagner's Ring cycle. And that is just a 3 part epic, operatic version of mythological tale.Ahh but where would Game of Thrones be without Lord of the Rings for a layout? As much as I do like GOT, I mean come on. The first time I encountered it I was like
"Oh a More politically charged LotR. Interesting."
LoTR, only because it hasn't been milked and butchered to death like Star Wars has.
True, but compare that to the terrible prequel and sequel trilogies of SW, and I've lost track of all of the side movies.The "The Hobbit" trilogy wants a word with you. One book made into 10 hours of footage spanning three movies.
Okay nerds.
Have at it
Make your case
Anyone watching the Dark Crystals prequel series on Netflix?
At least the Tolkien estate won't let them turn The Silmarillion into a movie.
I like Star Wars IV, V, and VI; I, II and III are tolerable. But VII and VIII suck! I'm not a fan of them.
But I like LotR by far. I been a fan of it since high school. The Hobbit wasn't bad, but there were too many liberties taken and deviations from the book. The movies are about the best they can be for movies based on a book. What can't be put into a movie is the characters' thoughts, narratives of their feelings, detailed descriptions of the land and environment. I think that's what makes a based-on movie fall short of the source material. And then there's over dramatization. While I think the balrog was awesome, it was way overdone vis-a-vis the book. It was described deliberately vaguely. But for the movie, it had to be a major bad-*** visually. The description of Gandalf's and the balrog's battle of wills through the stone door, such that the door shattered under the strain of the spells couldn't be translated to the screen.
Also, a lot more nudity and sex.Ahh but where would Game of Thrones be without Lord of the Rings for a layout? As much as I do like GOT, I mean come on. The first time I encountered it I was like
"Oh a More politically charged LotR. Interesting."
Ahh but Tolkien created a world unlike any other. And it spanned thousands of years. Harry Potter takes place basically in a whimsical England.You make a strong case for silver there. I take nothing away from scale or sense of epic; but then, Tom Riddle was after the world too.
But JKR has that stunning gift of knitting elaborate and gorgeous plots seamlessly, and offhand I can't think of a single joke told by Gandalf, Frodo, Aragorn, Legolas, Gimli .. why, not even Sauron or Shelob or the Balrog was up for a quip. And at least Harry got a pash under the mistletoe.
And if a clincher's still needed, well, I'm not aware of a fanfiction for Tolkien anything like the quality of Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality. (No, I'm not quite sure why that's relevant either, but it all goes on the scale.)
I watched it on TV (or online just using my TV, can’t remember.)Also, a lot more nudity and sex.
The first episode, featuring a hot guy banging his sister on cam kinda caught my attention.
I had checked out a DVD of the first season from the library. (I knew better than to pay for it.) But that first season was all I ever watched. Because the library wouldn't get any more and I saw no reason to pay for it.
What'sHerName walked into the funeral pyre and came out with a batch of baby dragons. And really nice boobs.
Oh well.
Tom
I have avoided the last season like the plague