• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Stereotype of porn watchers

Wherenextcolumbus

Well-Known Member


Well in that case, just choose your wording more carefully then to avoid retaliation/misinterpretation. Patriarchy is sexist in general.

BTW I still think you're making a daft generalization though with men being sexist in general. :p

I don't think it's daft at all, my dad, step dad, uncles, my boyfriend, sisters boyfriends, have all had sexists views of women, and the men in this forum have even admitted to having sexist views or participating in sexist actions towards women and some even have ridiculed my experiences :p

Some men move on, some don't
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I view "patriarchy" in Americastan thus:
Both men & women have great influence here. They hold supervisory jobs, they raise children, they start businesses, they elect politicians, they hold public office, they comment in media, etc. Whatever system we have, with all its pluses & minuses, is the result of these combined influences. Actual patriarchy involves a very very few men, ie, those who reign with real power. They are mostly men, but they individuals, & do not exemplify all men. In politics, women, being the majority of voters, elect them. A woman who votes for either Democrats or Republicans wields far more power than do I, because her candidates actually win, & go on to rule us. The patriarchy so often decried is a problem caused by people. So particularly to women folk who don't like it, I say "Do something about it.". If you see too few women in business, then start one. If you see too few women in politics, then run for office. If you don't like the politicians you elect, then vote for someone else. If you don't want patriarchists in society, raise your kids to be better than that.

I'm wearing a brick-proof Hawaiian shirt today, so let them fly!
 
Last edited:

Aquitaine

Well-Known Member
MysticSang'ha said:
I get that. My interpretation of her posting style and intent is that we should not forget the distinction of which gender currently has societal and economic privilege when compared side by side.

Aye, that's true. I do wonder sometimes though if the perspective would still be the same even if the reality of gender privilege was reversed. :shrug:

Oh I don't doubt your support for women. I think Horrorble's posting style is misconstrued many times because I see sarcasm and caustic speech being displayed by her. Sometimes, when discussing sensitive topics, sarcasm and caustic speech is a roll of the dice on how it is received.

She and I disagree on a few key points ourselves, but I don't believe she's ever attacked me. Even though her posting style hasn't changed between her targeting how she sees men perpetuating patriarchy, and how sex-positive feminists perpetuating patriarchy (that can be a tongue twister right there lol). She still IMO has made it clear that patriarchy is the real enemy, but she doesn't hold back on who she thinks keeps the patriarchy machine running.
I guess. Maybe I'm just not used to that sort of posting style - maybe I'm just perceiving it the wrong way... I dunno? :shrug:
I'd imagine a lot of it also has to do with the fact that we're communicating via text-only, which can really cause some problems with interpretation and understanding lol. >.<

Sorry to keep talking about you in the third person, H. And I really really really don't want people to think I'm speaking for you. This is simply how I see your posts, and why I think what you have to say has merit to it.
Aye, Horrorble I don't mean to be rude either by referring to you in the third person. :sorry1:
 

Aquitaine

Well-Known Member
I don't think it's daft at all, my dad, step dad, uncles, my boyfriend, sisters boyfriends, have all had sexists views of women, and the men in this forum have even admitted to having sexist views or participating in sexist actions towards women and some even have ridiculed my experiences :p

Some men move on, some don't

Aye, some people are sexist.
 

MysticSang'ha

Big Squishy Hugger
Premium Member


Aye, that's true. I do wonder sometimes though if the perspective would still be the same even if the reality of gender privilege was reversed. :shrug:


It's a good question. I myself shudder at the idea of a matriarchal culture. What pops in my head is The Wicker Man, and all I want to do is tell my boys that they're not drones who are easily expendable after they help procreate. :D

I guess. Maybe I'm just not used to that sort of posting style - maybe I'm just perceiving it the wrong way... I dunno? :shrug:
I'd imagine a lot of it also has to do with the fact that we're communicating via text-only, which can really cause some problems with interpretation and understanding lol. >.<

I know. There are a few posters who I think are misconstrued often because text-only conversation eliminates nuances in the non-verbal communication we have IRL. Smilies are our attempts at bringing non-verbal communication so we can get more of a gist to what people are saying, but not all posters find them worthwhile. Some even believe they're more of a distraction to the purity of the message.

I'm not perfect by any means, though. I've found myself saying "HEY YOU! STOP BEING SUCH A DRAG!" and find out later that they were just being sarcastic.

And I'm all like -------> :cover: :eek:
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Emoticons (smilies) are like gay sex.
I'm not bothered by other people doing it, but it's just not for me.
 

Aquitaine

Well-Known Member
MysticSang'ha said:
I know. There are a few posters who I think are misconstrued often because text-only conversation eliminates nuances in the non-verbal communication we have IRL. Smilies are our attempts at bringing non-verbal communication so we can get more of a gist to what people are saying, but not all posters find them worthwhile. Some even believe they're more of a distraction to the purity of the message.

I'm not perfect by any means, though. I've found myself saying "HEY YOU! STOP BEING SUCH A DRAG!" and find out later that they were just being sarcastic.

And I'm all like -------> :cover: :eek:
Uh-huh! It's the worst feeling ever, you just wish you could go back and delete what you previously said in order to save some embarassment lol. xD

Which technically you could do, but your quoted post would still exist in other people's replies. :p
 

DreadFish

Cosmic Vagabond
I quite enjoy seeing a well-placed emoticon..


:ymca:

That cop smiley really looks upset about something. The mustachioed smiley also looks a bit melancholy. I wonder why? I think that the cop smiley has been forced into doing the gay dance when he didn't want to and he now feels very embarrassed and maybe threatened :shrug:

The mustachioed one feels similar, but to a lesser degree.
 

sandy whitelinger

Veteran Member
I think a lot of it boils down to the whole notion that Women aren't to be sexual - they are to remain virgin and "pure". :shrug:
...:eek:no...never.
Where's Mae west when you need her:
"My left leg's Christmas and my right leg's Easter. Why don't you come up and visit me between the holidays?"
 
Top