Steve Bannon: 'Darkness is good'

[fantome profane]

I was thinking of how Ghandi's quote might be applied to the recent election.
Many see Hilda as evil (just as many do Trump), but "evil" is a perspective driven word, & its use will vary from person to person. Some might see Breitbart as evil, or defending it as not white supremacist as the same. That would be an extreme view.

As I type, I see the letter "k" being continually inserted here & there in the post.
I have to go back, delete all the superfluous ones, & hope I finish before my
computer inserts more. Every post is a race against the gremlins in the machine.

See rev, I told you the kkk was taking over.

 

[lewisnotmiller]

No..it's more like Alternet....not fake news or parody...but
real news distorted & hyped thru the lens of a true believer.

I'll take your word for it and steer clear of both.

 

[Revoltingest]

I'll take your word for it and steer clear of both.

Don't be so trusting of lunatics like me.

 

[pondsbb]

This was the first article I have ever heard from Bannon, and it is obvious to me that this article is hyperbole. I would have to read more to come to any other conclusion. Apparently a lot of people call him evil. From that I think he is in good company. A lot of people call a lot of other people evil.

 

[metis]

Sometimes I have to wonder whether some people who defend Bannon have ever spent any time whatsoever at the Breitbart website. And since Bannon was the editor, even articles not written by him are still under his sovereignty. Since even many Republicans have questioned Trump's appointment of him, doncha think that this alone should send up some red flags?

If he truly intended to "Make America Great Again", why would he have chosen such a divisive figure with such a "dark" reputation?