Duke_Leto
Active Member
We must remember that the military is a collection of
individuals, the shared culture & training notwithstanding.
There are both good & bad people in it.
Obviously. But the good ones don’t volunteer to murder.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
We must remember that the military is a collection of
individuals, the shared culture & training notwithstanding.
There are both good & bad people in it.
All of them involved very nasty people and I'm not talking about the allied side either.How am I as an American ‘served’ by the Vietnam War, the Korean War, the Iraq War, or the Afghan War? They don’t serve their country; they serve the interest of the state and the military-industrial complex.
What a radical post. Why go so far? You should be careful what you read.
All of them involved very nasty people and I'm not talking about the allied side either.
I disagree (if by "murder" you mean justifiable kills in battle).Obviously. But the good ones don’t volunteer to murder.
Didn't answer the "but what does this folksy platitude actually mean?" part of my post, which I'd saw was the more important part.Yes every member in my unit. That's evidence enough
Good thing you were never in my unit. A lot of us didn't have that kind of attitude. But I suppose that was then, and this is now. Real shame.Didn't answer the "but what does this folksy platitude actually mean?" part of my post, which I'd saw was the more important part.
If advocating the prevention of murder is radical, then I’m proud of it.
WHAT kind of attitude??!Good thing you were never in my unit. A lot of us didn't have that kind of attitude.
Still the platitudes, but now sanctimony as well? Cool. I'll take that as a result of the cognitive dissonance, generated from the fact you can't answer my question.But I suppose that was then, and this is now. Real shame.
Soldiers think of two things that are top priority, their country, and their fellow soldiers.
Corrupt and wrongful usage of the military by venal, flawed politicians does not diminish military members' courage and dedication. It's also possible to be "an effective soldier" without "abdicat(ing) moral responsibility"
More Russian? How would that have come about?If the U.S. never took part in war, I think the world would be much more Russian... much more communist.
But can the actor abdicate moral responsibility for his actions? Can leaders actually take the sins of the actual perpetrators upon themselves?How true. It is Congress that wages war not the military.
I'd hope so.But is the battle justifiable?
The big bad USSR would make the freedom living conservatives wear furry hats! Oh, the humanity!More Russian? How would that have come about?
But can the actor abdicate moral responsibility for his actions?
"Just following orders" was ruled an invalid defense, under international law, at Nuremberg.
Without a volunteer military,As it ought to have been and was held up in the Mi Lai Vietnam incident. But if our women and men do not believe they are in It for the greater good, I feel that would be the end of a volunteer military.
I'm not worried. With global warming there will soon be no further need need for furry hats.The big bad USSR would make the freedom living conservatives wear furry hats! Oh, the humanity!
With forced military "service," the general public would suddenly have a personal stake in US foreign policy. The powers-that-be want to avoid the public uprising that would ensue at all costs.Without a volunteer military,
soldiers will be in it simply to avoid prison.
That would make them more ethical?
Without a volunteer military,
soldiers will be in it simply to avoid prison.
That would make them more ethical?
I understand that it can be useful to hold a lottery to pick healthy heterosexualWith forced military "service," the general public would suddenly have a personal stake in US foreign policy. The powers-that-be want to avoid the public uprising that would ensue at all costs.
Maintaining and extending the empire would become much more difficult.