• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Stratigraphy, radiometric evidence, fossil evidence, and genetics.

dad

dad

Undefeated
shunyadragon said:
It has become abundantly clear in the history of your posts that your agenda is based on religious beliefs, because you have failed to present any objective evidence to support your assertions.

With science it is repeatedly objective verifiable evidence with predictable results and you have provided absolutely nothing, and yes absolutely nothing.
Click to expand...
Your religion is not the only kid on the block.
 
tas8831

tas8831

Well-Known Member
dad said:
Inbred strains of mice ?!! Nothing to do with origins. Gong!
Click to expand...
How typically naive and childish of you to purposefully not understand the entire group of papers.

You argue like a child, so go stamp your feet and repeat your dopey mantras while the grown ups laugh at you , like they've been doing for years.
 
tas8831

tas8831

Well-Known Member
dad said:
What is your evidence that states were different in the past?

All I have ever seen from you are repeated unsupported assertions and declarations of victory.
Click to expand...
If science had evidence for the nature it claims you could talk. In one hand you guys want to wave history away wholesale.. .and then you want your claimed state in the past to be waved in..no questions!
Click to expand...

So, you have nothing, just your repetitive dopey slogans and thin skin.

Sorry sonny - in real life, your default setting (religious fanatic) does not usurp facts and evidence.

You've got nothing but the tales of ancient numerologists with ZERO corroboration, and you desperately cling to it.

How sad.
 
dad

dad

Undefeated
tas8831 said:
Baloney. You just label everything above a 10th grade level 'belief' so you can ignore it.
Click to expand...
Nothing to ignore here. You don't seem aware or capable to discuss the underlying beliefs that form the foundation of your pseudo science origins so called science fables.
 
Milton Platt

Milton Platt

Well-Known Member
shunyadragon said:
With a complete dialogue where evolution is considered there needs to consider the four types of evidence together. No single type of evidence stands alone. Each offers certain predictive objective falsifiable evidence that interrelate to support the hypothesis or theory of evolution.

Actually the most important key is stratigraphy falsifying and demonstrating a history of earth billions of years old with orderly complete strata of the history of the earth in a number of places on the earth. There are many places where plate techtonics, mountain building, erosion, and deposition, though incomplete, can be correlated with those places on earth with a complete stratigraphic column. The volcanics in these strata may be dated to the time they occurred and and often eroded. The type deposition or intrusion of each strata may be accurately identified, such as beach sands, lake deposits, marine deposits, coral reefs wind blown sand, loess (wind blown silt.) Terrestrial deposits such as rivers, erosion surfaces showing river systems, and deposits of coal in swamps. All these deposits are in normal cyclic sequences, and the same way they are found today in deposition, erosion and the igneous - intrusion and volcanic deposits.Actually it was stratigraphy and erosion that the contemporaries of Darwin that lead them to the conclusion of an ancient earth.

All the fossil evidence and radiometric dating is consistent evidence that correlates with stratigraphy. It must be understood that the stratigraphic evidence stands alone as dating the age and history of the earth. The radiometric dating just increases the specific accuracy of the sequence of the strata.The fossil evidence correlates well with startegraphy in that the animal and plant life fossil are falsified and determined to be progressively more complex from simple life forms to more complex over a period of billions of years.

Hint:
there are no rabbit fossils in Cambrian rock strata.

The discussion of genetics as correlated with the other evidence will follow.
Click to expand...

I was going to make a comment, but there were too many multi-syllabic words in the OP :D:D:D:D:D:D:D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top