Poseidon Soter
Member
So, I'm not allowed to voice disapproval for a primitive gesture in supplication to a supposed god? Really?
In what way(s) is this a primitive gesture, to your mind?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So, I'm not allowed to voice disapproval for a primitive gesture in supplication to a supposed god? Really?
Hehe. And if I put on my psychologist hat...I think your line of thinking is primitive just as I think your avatar is quite childish although I loved mighty mouse as a kid, but if I wanted to put on my Psychologist hat I could have a plethora of things to say about that but it doesn't stop you from keeping your avatar.
For whatever strange and ungodly reason I like you YmirGF and so I say this with warm gooey feelings.
Your question has a fairly complex answer which considers the psychology behind the imagined need for such acts. Keep in mind that I am a so-called strong atheist in that it's not that I don't believe in gods, but that I go further and claim there are no gods - certainly not as imagined by human animals. There is so little evidence for god(s) that one would think that theists have a perma-blush over the reality that there is little to backup their claims other than their emotional connection to an idea.In what way(s) is this a primitive gesture, to your mind?
Jews pay nothing to your Jewish Jesus as well..
Hehe. And if I put on my psychologist hat...
To be fair, I see MOST religious practices as being fairly primitive, highly superficial acts, that are designed to make the practitioner feel good about their sinful little selves.
The difference is that "psych folks" are at least aware they are pretty odd. Most human animals think they are normal.Heh heh, Psych folk are pretty odd.
The difference is that "psych folks" are at least aware they are pretty odd. Most human animals think they are normal.
Hehe. And if I put on my psychologist hat...
To be fair, I see MOST religious practices as being fairly primitive, highly superficial acts, that are designed to make the practitioner feel good about their sinful little selves.
As Salaam Alaikum.
I study Abrahamic and pre-Abrahamic belief, but would likely not be seen as a good Muslim. Jewish belief confuses me though, both Christianity and Islam seem cloned by it. In their Old Book, Jews, spend a lot of time alluding to him, but when the Christians said he came, they did not believe it. In the Quran, a whole Surah (Chapter) talks about Issa PBUH (Jesus the Christ), and all three Abrahamic beliefs look for him to return, or come in the future. It is all very fascinating to me, and I love to study and talk about belief but I do not judge or attack anyone because only Allah SWT does that. I am but a servant to God.
Heh heh, Psych folk are pretty odd.
That is a famous critique about religion, and I'm sure some cosmic civilization in a far away galaxy may agree with you, but regardless of religion's primitive nature, it still provides a positive value to the individual.
In my opinion, the best Muslims are American converts, because they are more likely to read the Quran, Hadiths (The life of the Prophet and his sayings), and Fatwas (Rules on how to conduct your life). Most other countries have an Imam that is the only one who can read, so Muslims get his opinion.
Salam
Excuse-me but why americans in particular would be the best muslims ?
Why not the chilians, italians or japaneses ?
I don't think a convert is better than a muslim born muslim (not saying the muslims born are better either).
I've met some converts and some don't pray, don't fast, don't eat halal. (not saying it's the majority)
We even have seen that some new converts turned to extremism and went to Syria, Irak etc.
People tend to believe they studied more (i thought this too) but in reality it's not always like that.
Nowadays many muslims read Hadiths and previous Books too (Bible, comparative religions book,etc).
Maybe few decades ago the muslims just read the Quran and listened to their Imam but it changes since at least early 2000.
I'll leave Ellen to answer your question, but can you tell me how many Muslims do you think believe in the age of Aisha being so low - and all the rest that follows?
In general muslims used to ignore the age of Aicha.
It was bring those late years by non-muslims as debates concerning the morality of the prophet Muhammad.
So it's difficult to say if muslims in general have an interest to know those details.
Depend of what someone is teached or teached to himself.
I live in a religiously conservative part of the USA.Excuse-me but why americans in particular would be the best muslims ?
This is simply incorrect.In their Old Book, Jews, spend a lot of time alluding to him, but ...
I live in a religiously conservative part of the USA.
One of the things I hear regularly from Muslims around here is this. They like American freedom of religion. Because they can practice their Islam the way they think it should be. They don't have any autocratic kings or generals or imams telling them how they must be Muslim.
Or Else!
Tom
Wa alaikum salaam...
Although I myself am not Muslim, I've established a reputation of defending Muslims and Islam here....What irks me are insensitive Christians who want to tear down Muslims for their belief yet follow a Jewish man named Jesus as a Messiah. Someone who many Jews believe failed his mission to establish himself as a messiah. So while Christians of this kind want to tear down Muslims (the same Muslims who believe Jesus is the Messiah), they remain silent to the Jews who think Jesus was a failure smh....