Subjective Proof

[stvdv]

In the endless Cosmos out there, I feel deeply in my inner most mind,
that there is not a god of any sort watching over us in any form or manner.

Of course "The endless Cosmos out there" is pretty vast, so you could just have missed God, when "feeling deeply in your inner most mind".
But even if you did miss out on God, you are prepared for the worst "All alone, no God to help you out", so if God is there it is like a "bonus".

Or do you mean that while "feeling deeply in your inner most mind" that you found God "in your mind", and NOT in the "endless Cosmos"?

I have also been searching a little, but I found out that I had no definition of God, so did not know what to look for. How did you solved that?

 

[`mud]

Ahhhh….Stvdv, your getting pretty clever aren't you !
In my inner most mind I have no choice to make from.
What is imaginary and non-sensory is out of cognizance.
When I am gone, that will not change, I think !
Sooo….join me in the search, somewhere over the edge.

 

[allfoak]

If it makes no difference to you then why ask in the first place?.

Ahh, right, having fun... Do you think you are unique in that pastime? Think on that.

I don't feel like this conversation is very productive.
I'm going to end it now.☺

 

[ChristineM]

I don't feel like this conversation is very productive.
I'm going to end it now.☺

Jolly good. Enjoy

 

[atanu]

I answered both your questions in post 63. Have you moved your goalposts since then ?

You said:

Person : a human being regarded as an individual
Personal : belonging to or affecting a particular person rather than anyone else.
Note the difference​

...
I did not see any criteria spelled out whereby I could confirm separation of individual selves. Possibly you meant 'separation of bodies' as the criteria. But you know bodies are endowed with intellect and predilections. '

So, your definition of "Objective : not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.", is an ideal one. IN my understanding, as long as the judgement is 'personal', true objectivity will be doubtful.

 

[ChristineM]

You said:

Person : a human being regarded as an individual
Personal : belonging to or affecting a particular person rather than anyone else.
Note the difference​

...
I did not see any criteria spelled out whereby I could confirm separation of individual selves. Possibly you meant 'separation of bodies' as the criteria. But you know bodies are endowed with intellect and predilections. '

So, your definition of "Objective : not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.", is an ideal one. IN my understanding, as long as the judgement is 'personal', true objectivity will be doubtful.

I dont really what your understanding is, the definition is accepted as definitive.

 

[`mud]

`Person` is to `personal` as skin is to life, one's own is one's own,
none other can share it or posses it, it is one's being and spirit.