• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Sunnis... You guys know you are more wrong than Shia right?

Troy12

New Member
Well i dont believe in islam or anything. Considering there's just too much to take with the satanic verses, whether it is historically reliable or not of several trustworthy mursal reports, which ibn taymiyyah said would be authentic. Although he is salafi so ... well i whatever it is lol.

But the point is.

Quran: 69-44-46
Sahih al-Bukhari:4428

The arabic word is general aorta i believe
And then in sahih al-bukhari or other sunnah hadiths it is like aortal, aortic. Possibly part of an aorta. Basically what this means is if muhammad made up false stuff then god would cut his aorta. Which happens, so if sunni is correct then you have to reject muhammad.

Also there are some hadiths which i dont remember but i know it is in sahih muslim. And it was due to the poison. The jewess women said "I have determined to kill you" which muhammad replied "Allah would never give you the power to do it" according to the bible if a prophet says something and it doesnt come true then you shouldnt worry about it. Since on his death bed muhammad said his aorta was cut from the poison in khaibar.

So these are central reasons i believe. I believe shia have their own hadiths, and are more or less not into the hadiths by sunnis. So whenever some sunni suprematic fool speaks in the comments they usually have done little research i think :p

Like i don't believe islam is true, because if i am wrong i am likely going to hell either way. So i may aswell pick one that is likely true in my view, but i wouldnt care if you came to your own conclusion and believed what you believe.

I think the reason shia reject sunnah hadiths in general is because "Correct me if i am wrong" but they met christians and criticized them, and then christians criticized their followers for forging etc. Which some shiites kinda agreed with. And thats why they dont always trust each of the companions etc.

Like all i am saying is Shia have more reliable ground to stand on than Sunnis if i had to pick something. And i am just wondering one question btw. Do shiites accept Jesus crucifixion and that he died on it? Because this is rejected in sunni commentaries by people like ibn kathir etc.

Also i put this thread here because
1: Clarification
2: Heated debates :D
 
Last edited:

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
Well i dont believe in islam or anything. Considering there's just too much to take with the satanic verses, whether it is historically reliable or not of several trustworthy mursal reports, which ibn taymiyyah said would be authentic. Although he is salafi so ... well i whatever it is lol.

But the point is.

Quran: 69-44-46
Sahih al-Bukhari:4428

The arabic word is general aorta i believe
And then in sahih al-bukhari or other sunnah hadiths it is like aortal, aortic. Possibly part of an aorta. Basically what this means is if muhammad made up false stuff then god would cut his aorta. Which happens, so if sunni is correct then you have to reject muhammad.

Also there are some hadiths which i dont remember but i know it is in sahih muslim. And it was due to the poison. The jewess women said "I have determined to kill you" which muhammad replied "Allah would never give you the power to do it" according to the bible if a prophet says something and it doesnt come true then you shouldnt worry about it. Since on his death bed muhammad said his aorta was cut from the poison in khaibar.

So these are central reasons i believe. I believe shia have their own hadiths, and are more or less not into the hadiths by sunnis. So whenever some sunni suprematic fool speaks in the comments they usually have done little research i think :p

Like i don't believe islam is true, because if i am wrong i am likely going to hell either way. So i may aswell pick one that is likely true in my view, but i wouldnt care if you came to your own conclusion and believed what you believe.

I think the reason shia reject sunnah hadiths in general is because "Correct me if i am wrong" but they met christians and criticized them, and then christians criticized their followers for forging etc. Which some shiites kinda agreed with. And thats why they dont always trust each of the companions etc.

Like all i am saying is Shia have more reliable ground to stand on than Sunnis if i had to pick something. And i am just wondering one question btw. Do shiites accept Jesus crucifixion and that he died on it? Because this is rejected in sunni commentaries by people like ibn kathir etc.

Also i put this thread here because
1: Clarification
2: Heated debates :D
It's always so neat to have strong opinions on a subject one has little knowledge of, eh?
 
Top