SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
I'm actually educated in the sciences. How about you?You clearly don't know what you're talking about. The scientific method says nothing about peer review.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'm actually educated in the sciences. How about you?You clearly don't know what you're talking about. The scientific method says nothing about peer review.
No where in this article can I find an actual link to the Nature study. Where is it?Why should anyone care what Wiki has to say about it? Natural News provided the link to article from Nature.
So .... conspiracy stuff.Journalist Liz Gunn releases an official statement advising the NZ Ministry of Health Whistleblower and person working with him have both been raided by police.
Liz Gunn reports police are still surrounding the Whistleblowers’ home after several hours following the raid.
Gunn calls for the New Zealand government to call off this tyrannical response and give the Whistleblower the honour and respect he deserves as a national hero.
Uncensored: Liz Gunn NZ Government Whistleblower EXPLODES Worldwide!!! Accountability is COMING!
Journalist Liz Gunn joins Maria Zeee after releasing the most damning data to date on COVID crimes, with NZ Ministry of Health whistleblower data showing the death of New Zealanders directly from therumble.com
Since when?You clearly don't know what you're talking about. The scientific method says nothing about peer review.
Link to Natural News:No where in this article can I find an actual link to the Nature study. Where is it?
You have no clue.So .... conspiracy stuff.
Since its inception.Since when?
Except it's actually a cornerstone of science.Since its inception.
No, no, we actually have no clue, Shadow Wolf. We have absolutely no idea what we're talking about.Except it's actually a cornerstone of science.
You don't know what you're talking about.Except it's actually a cornerstone of science.
Having an actual point to make trumps vain innuendo every time.No, no, we actually have no clue, Shadow Wolf. We have absolutely no idea what we're talking about.
Peer Review could be viewed as objective assessment .. assuming the peer review process was objective .. but such proceedure .. objective assessment and challenging of some research conclusion could be said to be one of the cornerstones of science.Except it's actually a cornerstone of science.
You don't know what you're talking about.
Scientific method | Definition, Steps, & Application | Britannica
Scientific method, mathematical and experimental technique employed in the sciences. More specifically, it is the technique used in the construction and testing of a scientific hypothesis. The scientific method is applied broadly across the sciences.www.britannica.com
No, no, we actually have no clue, Shadow Wolf. We have absolutely no idea what we're talking about.
I've provided you with citations demonstrating that we do know what we're talking about.You don't know what you're talking about.
Scientific method | Definition, Steps, & Application | Britannica
Scientific method, mathematical and experimental technique employed in the sciences. More specifically, it is the technique used in the construction and testing of a scientific hypothesis. The scientific method is applied broadly across the sciences.www.britannica.com
I've made many points that you've completely ignored. As noted several times.Having an actual point to make trumps vain innuendo every time.
WTF are you talking about?as if this is an argument for something and hoping this passes as Science
So you say. You're not a credible source.I've provided you with citations demonstrating that we do know what we're talking about.
Well look at that, we agree on something (I think)!Peer Review could be viewed as objective assessment .. assuming the peer review process was objective .. but such proceedure .. objective assessment and challenging of some research conclusion could be said to be one of the cornerstones of science.
and you two .. aparently are the ones who have no idea according to Skeptic and I concur .. especially posting a definition from encyclopedia without comment .. as if this is an argument for something and hoping this passes as Science ?! .. it does not.
Not this part though. But you can't have everything.Fortunately I am here .. so have no fear .. Subject Matter Expert -on issues of Free Speech and Covid Science .. and in terms of this OP -- all we need to know is that the Gov't Lied .. and suppressed the Truth via mainstream and social media manipulation and control .. fed the public Propaganda and lies .. then violated essential liberty "My body my choice" on the basis of these lies using authoritarian police state tactics.
Was all very disturbing to me I must say.
You can easily scroll back and see for yourself. Both with this thread and the other COVID thread.So you say. You're not a credible source.
You can easily pretend that you're not delusional.You can easily scroll back and see for yourself.
Vaccines have saved many people and I would never want to give ammunition to people who argue against vaccines.I know many who were very sick or died from Covid.
Not one was vaccinated.
I know many who had no symptoms or a mild case.
All were vaccinated.
Coincidence?
Vaccination was based on bad science from the beginning. Immunity to smallpox was gained from exposure to cowpox via skin contact, not by injection. The decrease in mortality back in the day was due to better hygiene and started before vaccination was commonplace.Vaccines have saved many people
Analysis of the NZ data suggests that the elderly are more susceptible to harm from the "safe and effective covid vaccine".They were in there 70s, but neither seemed particularly fragile.