McBell
Unbound
And there in lies the problem.
You do not know.
Worse yet, you refuse to learn.
Even when it is being spoon fed to you.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Suppression of Free Speech on Covid
- Thread starter Kenny
- Start date
You do not know.
Worse yet, you refuse to learn.
Even when it is being spoon fed to you.
McBell
Unbound
Willful ignorance is not a valid excuse.
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
It's not water, it's your prejudice at work.You can lead a horse to water.
Take care.
Keep telling yourself that while you refuse to read the things I show you.
I think we're done here if you have nothing of substance to add and you're just gonna reply with "nuh uh!"
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
Actually, the things that you provide vague references to.
Physician heal thyself! Rod of Asclepius anyone? Lol.
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
You can lead a horse to water.
Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.
COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign
Our understanding of COVID-19 vaccinations and their impact on health and mortality has evolved substantially since the first vaccine rollouts. Published reports from the original randomized phase 3 trials concluded that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could greatly reduce COVID-19 symptoms. In the...
www.cureus.com
McBell
Unbound
Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.
COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign
Our understanding of COVID-19 vaccinations and their impact on health and mortality has evolved substantially since the first vaccine rollouts. Published reports from the original randomized phase 3 trials concluded that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could greatly reduce COVID-19 symptoms. In the...
Linking to the comment doesn't make it make any more sense. You have yet to explain how any of it is connected to vaccines or why we should believe there is a giant coverup of vaccine safety data by governments across the globe. And I've asked repeatedly for you to do so and you haven't. That's all there is to it, really.
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
Not my problem that you don't understand what I just posted.
" The rod of Asclepius connects to the British Monarch (Defender of the Faith) via the crucifixion".
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
BBC ‘misrepresented’ Covid risk to boost lockdown support, inquiry told
BBC ‘misrepresented’ Covid risk to boost lockdown support, inquiry told
Epidemiologist Prof Mark Woolhouse criticised corporation for reporting rare deaths among healthy adults as the norm during pandemic
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
That was BBC. So?BBC ‘misrepresented’ Covid risk to boost lockdown support, inquiry told
BBC ‘misrepresented’ Covid risk to boost lockdown support, inquiry told
Epidemiologist Prof Mark Woolhouse criticised corporation for reporting rare deaths among healthy adults as the norm during pandemicwww.telegraph.co.uk
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
Nothing to see here, just media whores doing what media whores do.That was BBC. So?
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
Your sources? I get mine from multiple sources, including those I don't much trust. After all, even a blind chicken gets a worm once in a while.
With covid, I especially concentrate on using scientific sources, especially "Scientific American" but not exclusive that.
As for your posts, it seems you are all so willing to blow off any source that doesn't agree with your predetermined opinions.
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
Only the single source of truth, Jacinda Adern (or those who agree with her).
Seriously though, those who are unwilling to deal with the facts are most probably wrong.
If you think that I've blown off a source who had a valid point then feel free to make your case.
wellwisher
Well-Known Member
What we learned from the COVID censorship, that occurred before the Biden election, is you cannot trust the Democrats to know or tell the truth. They always seem to be running scams. We also learned that the Democrat propaganda machine, in the media, will help them sell the lies, that their base will swallow, hook line and sinker. How many thought what was censored was pseudo science due to being told?
Their base was told and then claimed to be the party of science, to add collective subjective prestige to the scam. But they still seem to have no clue how science is done. Good science will follow any lead. Instead, they think Science is a type of consensus, with all opposing views, science fiction, and needing to be censored and defunded. This is not science, but political interference; COVID parallel.
Will their base learn anything, now that COVID censorship of opposing ideas was never legitimate? I guess not, since they were never taught how to think in a critical scientific way. In real science, all experiments and ideas; even blue sky, all add something to the collective understanding of nature. We can learn from mistakes. Science does not have to agree with the Swamp's agenda to be good science.
The Censorship side's number one green energy and climate change cheer leader, Kerry, is resigning, because China and India are not with the program and are the two main polluters. They will still sell goods to those who are under the spell. Good Business does not judge their best customers. All US money is green.
The same set of con artists also told us that Trump was a Russian Spy and puppet of Putin. They told us there was no election interference including the mileage that got from social media censorship in general and COVID censorship in particular.
One way for the Swamp to save their credibility; one more chance, is to allow all climate science research, including the opposition ideas, like we now have to do with COVID. If the Swamp was correct, there is nothing to worry about. Only Crooks running a con need to control the narrative. A scam will fall apart if there is free speech to provide good angles that can see how the magic trick works. Some angles will not hide the hidden wires and need to be censored.
The current climate models do not take into account the inner earth, which gave us last years extreme weather that was not predicted by any of the atmospheric only models. The scammers are preparing for the wrong fight.
Their base was told and then claimed to be the party of science, to add collective subjective prestige to the scam. But they still seem to have no clue how science is done. Good science will follow any lead. Instead, they think Science is a type of consensus, with all opposing views, science fiction, and needing to be censored and defunded. This is not science, but political interference; COVID parallel.
Will their base learn anything, now that COVID censorship of opposing ideas was never legitimate? I guess not, since they were never taught how to think in a critical scientific way. In real science, all experiments and ideas; even blue sky, all add something to the collective understanding of nature. We can learn from mistakes. Science does not have to agree with the Swamp's agenda to be good science.
The Censorship side's number one green energy and climate change cheer leader, Kerry, is resigning, because China and India are not with the program and are the two main polluters. They will still sell goods to those who are under the spell. Good Business does not judge their best customers. All US money is green.
The same set of con artists also told us that Trump was a Russian Spy and puppet of Putin. They told us there was no election interference including the mileage that got from social media censorship in general and COVID censorship in particular.
One way for the Swamp to save their credibility; one more chance, is to allow all climate science research, including the opposition ideas, like we now have to do with COVID. If the Swamp was correct, there is nothing to worry about. Only Crooks running a con need to control the narrative. A scam will fall apart if there is free speech to provide good angles that can see how the magic trick works. Some angles will not hide the hidden wires and need to be censored.
The current climate models do not take into account the inner earth, which gave us last years extreme weather that was not predicted by any of the atmospheric only models. The scammers are preparing for the wrong fight.
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
You obviously only believe in what you want to believe-- to hell with science.