AdityaMookerjee
Member
Swastika's are Hindu religious symbols, and Hitler thought they were Aryan, because they are Hindu. I could be seriously incorrect. The symbol has nothing to do with war, but signifies auspicious and favour, broadly.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If the swastika has been a symbol of Jainism for a thousand years, should its usage as a Nazi symbol taint its usage in Jainism?
If the swastika has been a symbol of Jainism for a thousand years, should its usage as a Nazi symbol taint its usage in Jainism?
People might be offended, if the reason of any old man, child, or woman being killed is symbolized by the Cross, and then people ask if the Cross is not holy at all. Also, is any holy Jewish symbol responsible, when Christian and Muslim women and children are killed for any reason, in the act of any Jewish soldier, belonging to any army?If the swastika has been a symbol of Jainism for a thousand years, should its usage as a Nazi symbol taint its usage in Jainism?
It's certainly found in classical sites. The Romans used it extensively as well.
It's also quite common in the far east. A repeating pattern called the "sayagata" which consists of tessellating swastika shapes was used on the imperial robes of Chinese and Japanese emperors for thousands of years, after having been transmitted there by via Indian Buddhism.
I think people focus too much on symbols and not enough on what they mean.
for me the swastika is Indigenous American Indian First Nation warrior religion , I have no love of politics I leave politics to the politicians.