• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Tara Rede the woman that accuses Biden of sexually assaulting her, sues DOJ for millions.

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
The question is will Tara be given the same legal 'courtesy' as Jane Carroll received? Or will it be vastly different?


I think the answer to that question will be actually how her case will be handled and processed going foreward, how she is going to be being treated admist her allegations not only by the DOJ, but against her alleged sexual attacker then VP Joe Biden as I'm fairly sure she is not stopping with the DOJ.

Commence the debate.
 

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
The question is will Tara be given the same legal 'courtesy' as Jane Carroll received? Or will it be vastly different?


I think the answer to that question will be actually how her case will be handled and processed going foreward, how she is going to be being treated admist her allegations not only by the DOJ, but against her alleged sexual attacker then VP Joe Biden as I'm fairly sure she is not stopping with the DOJ.

Commence the debate.

Hit a Fox paywall. Any other accessible source?
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
The question is will Tara be given the same legal 'courtesy' as Jane Carroll received? Or will it be vastly different?


I think the answer to that question will be actually how her case will be handled and processed going foreward, how she is going to be being treated admist her allegations not only by the DOJ, but against her alleged sexual attacker then VP Joe Biden as I'm fairly sure she is not stopping with the DOJ.

Commence the debate.
Suing an individual (Carroll v Trump) is fundamentally
very different from suing the federal government.
You'll be able to see what you want to see.

Hey, how did Reade's suit against Biden go?
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Suing an individual (Carroll v Trump) is fundamentally
very different from suing the federal government.
You'll be able to see what you want to see.

Hey, how did Reade's suit against Biden go?
Tara Reid has been incredibly silent since she ran to Russia for her definition of safety from a vindictive Biden regime.

I'm in the dark just like everybody else as there was not a peep since until now.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
The question is will Tara be given the same legal 'courtesy' as Jane Carroll received? Or will it be vastly different?


I think the answer to that question will be actually how her case will be handled and processed going foreward, how she is going to be being treated admist her allegations not only by the DOJ, but against her alleged sexual attacker then VP Joe Biden as I'm fairly sure she is not stopping with the DOJ.

Commence the debate.
What debate?
I am disheartened by dems' doublestandardism. It's really disheartening.

Carroll is right, because Trump is a devil.
Rede is wrong, because Biden is a saint.

That sums up dems' doublestandardism.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
What debate?
I am disheartened by dems' doublestandardism. It's really disheartening.
It does come across that women who feel that they have been sexually assaulted by high power individuals all depends on their political disposition and those who are in charge of selected judges along with their own political affiliations with predetermined outcomes and rewards of those trials.

It does validate the reason as to why there are statute of limitations in the first place.

The real frightening part is the evidence-less directions that are being taken to adequately declare a person guilty or innocent of any said crime all on the basis of accusation and little or nothing else provided that can speak for it.

Tara Reid is no different than Jean Carroll in that regard, but the outcomes will speak volumes on the nature of these two similar cases and the nature of those who judge those cases along with the rewards granted to these people.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
It does come across that women who feel that they have been sexually assaulted by high power individuals all depends on their political disposition and those who are in charge of selected judges along with their own political affiliations with predetermined outcomes and rewards of those trials.

It does validate the reason as to why there are statute of limitations in the first place.

The real frightening part is the evidence-less directions that are being taken to adequately declare a person guilty or innocent of any said crime all on the basis of accusation and little or nothing else provided that can speak for it.

Tara Reid is no different than Jean Carroll in that regard, but the outcomes will speak volumes on the nature of these two similar cases and the nature of those who judge those cases along with the rewards granted to these people.
Exactly.
These women who appear after years and years, sometimes after decades, saying that they decided to denounce that fact.
What a coincidence...they take the big decision, only after all these politicians become presidents...
and not before that.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It does come across that women who feel that they have been sexually assaulted by high power individuals all depends on their political disposition and those who are in charge of selected judges along with their own political affiliations with predetermined outcomes and rewards of those trials.
It seems that way to people who don't bother
to look into things. How did Reade's civil suit
against Biden go? Oh, that's right...instead of
filing one, she moved to Russia. Carroll's suit
had enuf evidence to convince a jury. Reade
has only accusations that appeal to Magas.
 
Last edited:

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Those are the actual reasons presented by Tara. I certainly didn't make them up.


Yet none have been vetted by attorneys
in a court. Anyone can make accusations.
Hers might even be cromulent. But they
'they cannot be taken as fact, unlike
Carroll's.
Or are you one of those feminists who
claim women never lie or make things up?
Reade has a very troubled past that casts
doubt on her claims.

Lookie here....to call Biden a "dirt bag" is unfair to
bags of dirt. But evidence should rule when
judging the accuser & accused.
Trump admitted publicly that he repeatedly
sexually assaulted women. And a jury found
that he did assault one in particular.
Reade complains, but took no action to prove
her allegations. You got nuthin but your own
love of Trump, & hatred of Biden.
I'm fair & balanced. I hate them both.
 
Last edited:

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
It seems that way to people who don't bother
to look into things. How did Eade's civil suit
against Biden go? Oh, that's right...instead of
filing one, she moved to Russia. Carroll's suit
had enuf evidence to convince a jury. Reade
has only accusations that appeal to Magas.
That's because you're predetermining everything along political lines and totally ignoring the sexual assault allegations itself and going on by that merit alone.

And does enuf evidence, in your own words include that very evasive and non-existent coat or dress that they're talking about that they actually have, but for some reason, can't ever present it in a courtroom proper?
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
You're the one judging without any evidence.
All you have is Trump love, & Biden hate to
guide you.
I don't hate Biden at all.
I did point out that I haven't seen the evidence of Raede's allegations yet.

But the difference between dems and me, is that they consider Trump a priori guilty.
 

Firenze

Active Member
Premium Member
The question is will Tara be given the same legal 'courtesy' as Jane Carroll received? Or will it be vastly different?


I think the answer to that question will be actually how her case will be handled and processed going foreward, how she is going to be being treated admist her allegations not only by the DOJ, but against her alleged sexual attacker then VP Joe Biden as I'm fairly sure she is not stopping with the DOJ.

Commence the debate.
So, it's Biden 1, Trump 18...... :eek:
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
That's because you're predetermining everything along political lines....
Wrongo pongo, Trumpophile.
I look at court rulings.
Unlike you & the other Trump lover here.

BTW, Trump's own proud public announcement
that he sexually assaults women is also damning.
He just thought that he could get away with it.
And that Republicans would admire him for it.
(As do some Italians.)
But he found out otherwise in civil court, & now
in the court of public opinion, ie, women starting
to vote against him. Apparently many women
(other than Italians) don't some rando grabbing
at their crotch.
 
Top