Tara Rede the woman that accuses Biden of sexually assaulting her, sues DOJ for millions.

[SkepticThinker]

I respect your opinion.
But you can't demand that I consider her testimony that credible.
I consider her as credible as Trump. So it's her word against his.
Period.

Literature is filled with false rape allegations. Even the Bible, in the Genesis. Potiphar's wife.

Well, this one was demonstrated to be true in a court of law.

 

[Subduction Zone]

What behavior?
And when did he state that?

Trump openly bragged that he would just "Grab them by the *****". He laughed at his ability to do that because of his wealth. It was recorded in an interview. Didn't you know that?

 

[Estro Felino]

On that tape that you keep brushing off as "locker room talk."
Turns out it was "reality talk."

He says "they let you do anything". It means they give their consent.

 

[Estro Felino]

Trump openly bragged that he would just "Grab them by the *****". He laughed at his ability to do that because of his wealth. It was recorded in an interview. Didn't you know that?

Which is absolutely true.
Do you know how many models and actresses chased PM Berlusconi, because he was a billionaire?
They even admitted to that, on TV.

 

[SkepticThinker]

No, not "period". You are forgetting the two women that corroborate her story. You are forgetting that there are other women that testified to similar behavior, you are forgetting that Trump himself stated that he did that sort of behavior when he felt like it. And even worse, it was not his word against hers. Trump fled the country during the trial. He was not forced to, but he could have testified. It is only Carroll's word if you want to use that standard. You could not be more wrong about the evidence if you tried.

If it was just his word against hers I would agree with you. But it is not. And you have to know this by now.

You gotta love Trump's constant assertions that he's going to prove he's right about everything in court (rape, the election being stolen, etc.) yet every time he gets his day in court, what do we get from him? Nada. Zilch. Zip.

 

[Subduction Zone]

He says "they let you do anything". It means they give their consent.

No, that is not "consent". Overpowering a woman and having your way with her and her being too afraid at the time to report a rich and powerful man is not "consent'. How lonely are you that you think that qualifies as consent by a woman?

 

[SkepticThinker]

He says "they let you do anything". It means they give their consent.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Which is absolutely true.
Do you know how many models and actresses chased PM Berlusconi, because he was a billionaire?
They even admitted to that, on TV.

Not true. Try to grab me by the **** and see what happens to you. I promise, you won't like it.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Which is absolutely true.
Do you know how many models and actresses chased PM Berlusconi, because he was a billionaire?
They even admitted to that, on TV.

A claimed "jurist" that does not know how to reason rationally. Okay, I am done here for a while.

 

[Estro Felino]

No, that is not "consent". Overpowering a woman and having your way with her and her being too afraid at the time to report a rich and powerful man is not "consent'. How lonely are you that you think that qualifies as consent by a woman?

So many men overpowered me and I let them do that.
I gave my consent.

 

[Estro Felino]

Not true. Try to grab me by the **** and see what happens to you. I promise, you won't like it.

I am not a lesbian.

 

[SkepticThinker]

So many men overpowered me and I let them do that.
I gave my consent.

I'm sorry that happened to you. That is not okay.

 

[SkepticThinker]

I am not a lesbian.

Not sure what that has to do with anything. But thanks for sharing.

 

[Estro Felino]

I'm sorry that happened to you. That is not okay.

Also: Trump probably bragged about something which wasn't true.
Some men brag about cheating on their wife, but actually it's just made up.

 

[Firenze]

You confuse that with criticizing
your claim of legal authority.
Belief that videotapes are necessary
for conviction is utterly absurd.
Dismissing a jury verdict because you
personally haven't seen the evidence
is utterly absurd.
Giving credence to claims not supported
by any court equal footing to a judgment
in court is utterly absurd.
Italy cannot be so completely bonkers &
lawless that such views are normal there.

Well, they did elect a fascist….

 

[Revoltingest]

He says "they let you do anything". It means they give their consent.

I means he believes they let him do it.
The jury found that at least one did not consent.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Also: Trump probably bragged about something which wasn't true.

Seriously? He bragged about doing a thing, and has now been found civilly liable for doing THAT VERY THING.

Some men brag about cheating their wife, but actually it's just made up.

Trump actually cheated on his wives.

Another bad example.

 

[Estro Felino]

I means he believes they let him do it.
The jury found that at least one did not consent.

That's Trump in 1996.
Do you think he needed someone like Carroll?

 

[Revoltingest]

That's Trump in 1996.
Do you think he needed someone like Carroll?

He didn't need her.
But he apparently did want to sexually assault her.
Are you unaware of the jury verdict?

 

[Estro Felino]

He didn't need her.
But he apparently did want to sexually assault her.
Are you unaware of the jury verdict?

If he had wanted to have random sex, he would have flown to Milan or Paris, where tens of beautiful models would have fought and scrambled to sleep with him.