Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The article seemed rather dishonest....lots'o putting words in other people's mouths & generalizing about the many from the purported actions of the few.
They never cease to astonish me, those republicans.
It's what we get for allowing our village idiots to organize.
Just move to Australia already!
And restructure your school system to ensure an ever-increasing population of village idiots, apparently.
I think it will have to be New Zealand. All the other English speaking countries are being run by idiots.
I am three quarters convinced that the failure of our schools is a plot by our politicians and leaders to dumb us down for easier manipulation.
Like, today, I posted on my blog a tight little summary of the steps the US Government takes when it wants to demonize someone. The US Government takes the same steps each time -- regardless of whether the target is Sadam Hussein, Julian Assange or someone else. So, I was thinking as I posted those steps that, if our system were a bit more geared to producing good citizens than to merely producing good workers, those steps would be taught in classrooms so that people would be better able to defend themselves when their government lies to them. But no way is that ever going to happen.
Are you dishonest or stupid for buying into this lame over-generalization?More historical revisionism from the Right. Sickening, these Conservatard Nazis need to be rejected by every good person in all conscience. Anything Republican, "Libertarian" or TEA Party is toxic.
Are you dishonest or stupid for buying into this lame over-generalization? Libertarians have no skeletons in their closet with respect to Democrats, who first defended slavery & then Jim Crow.
Both major parties play fast & loose with the Constitution. Given your posts, you ought not be too quick to call anyone else "dishonest" or "toxic".The fact remains that the TEA Party and Republicans in general now plead Constitutionalism and the mantra of the "Founding Fathers" for political gain, whilst editing out the bits of the constitution they don't like. It doesn't take much of a stretch to mark this approach as intellectually dishonest and pure revisionism.
Both major parties play fast & loose with the Constitution. Given your posts, you ought not be too quick to call anyone else "dishonest" or "toxic".
If history teaches us anything... yes, there are people that think that way.This isn't a joke article is it?
I've asked this question many times before on this forum, but really, how do we know this is true? Are there actually people this brain dead that have the capacity to beat their heart and inflate and deflate their lungs? Perhaps it's the internet demonstrating a capacity to diminish returns on the validity of information through successive mutation of the original data. I'm getting concerned.
CSMonitor said:Among the changes: Students would be required to learn about the “unintended consequences” of Title IX, affirmative action, and the Great Society, and would need to study conservative icons like Phyllis Schlafly, the Heritage Foundation, and the Moral Majority.
The slave trade would be renamed the “Atlantic triangular trade,” American “imperialism” changed to “expansionism,” and all references to “capitalism” have been replaced with “free enterprise.”
The role of Thomas Jefferson – who argued for the separation of church and state – is minimized in several places, and the standards would emphasize the degree to which the Founding Fathers were driven by Christian principles.
Washington Times said:In final edits leading up to the vote, conservatives rejected language to modernize the classification of historic periods to B.C.E. and C.E. from the traditional B.C. and A.D. They also required that public school students in Texas evaluate efforts by global organizations such as the United Nations to undermine U.S. sovereignty.
McLeroy offered the amendment requiring students to evaluate efforts by global organizations including the U.N. to undermine U.S. sovereignty, saying they threatened individual liberty and freedom.
During the monthslong process of creating the guidelines, conservatives successfully strengthened the requirements on teaching the Judeo-Christian influences of the nation's Founding Fathers and attempted to water down rationale for the separation of church and state.
The standards will refer to the U.S. government as a "constitutional republic," rather than "democratic," and students will be required to study the decline in the value of the U.S. dollar, including the abandonment of the gold standard.