The point to you is that it's not a furry animal. The point to me is that people torture things on any level - and that to me is wrong. Why can't you just agree to disagree with me on this one?
Because that's not the point of contention. We both agree that torturing living things is wrong. You even say "on any level". So, clearly you realize there are different levels to it. The point of my contention here is that the different levels is the key here.
To you, there is a clear difference between a mammal and a scaly creature on the grounds that the mammals are more like humans. I'm not ignoring your point, and I get your point - you think that there's no harm if blatant torture for pets or furry animals hasn't occurred. Fair enough, that's your opinion.
No, that's not what I think. Again, this would go much smoother if you'd actually read everything I say, and not just the bits that help your argument. I never said there's no harm if it's not a pet or furry animal. I clearly said the opposite. I said that there are different degrees of harm. Torturing bugs as a kid is equivalent to stealing another kid's toy when you're 7. It's not right, but in the grand scheme of things, it's not that big a deal.
It's not mine. I completely disagree because I believe in intent. I believe that if you've got no problem killing one thing, and don't feel bad for it whatsoever, you've got issues. Now, we can stand here and point at each other and say "your'e sick" "well YOU'RE sick" but it's not doing anyone any good and it's certainly not helping the dog that was set on fire. So I'm done.
But see, that's exactly where you're wrong, and that's my whole point. If you kill or torture a bug as a kid, that doesn't necessarily mean you could do anything close to that to a human. If you kill or torture a dog as the kids in this case did, there's a very real and good reason to believe they could do something similar to a human. It's precisely because of the huge difference betweena bug and a dog. That's the difference I was trying to point out when I pointed out that you've killed a bug before, but you've never killed anything like a mouse or cat or dog. That huge difference is the reason for that.
My bother had no problem killing bugs as a kid, now he has no problem torturing other animals like cats or dogs. I see a connection where there is no remourse, there is no learning. Where there is mal intent, it only grows. But that's just me.
Well, than there's a problem with your brother. However, that's an unusual case. Many kids torture bugs. They then grow up and realize they shouldn't do that to living things. I'm an example of that, and many people I know are further examples. So, it seems that your assessment of the situation is based on a single case that goes against the norm.