sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Which is why, in discerning such an all-encompassing doctrine about the nature of Jesus, we have to look at as many facets as we can -- not just one. Mark clearly presents us with a Jesus that is very humanlike. John, OTOH, presents us with a Jesus that is very mythic. But they both "work," because one of the most basic tenets of Xy, found in the most ancient gospel source -- that of Q -- is the parable of the leaven. the thrust of the parable is that God becomes dirty for us (becomes human), because we cannot become clean (righteous) enough for God. And that's how God reconciles us -- by becoming one of us. How else can reconciliation be achieved?The most confusing part I find about Divinity of Jesus or Christ being God is that the earliest gospel we have which is that of St. Mark makes no reference to divinity or Jesus' birth. In fact in Mark the most Jesus says outright is that he is a prophet. Later on in the gospel he makes references to being the Messiah but little else. Other gospels that came later included the birth and divinity of Christ which leads to me being very confused. Usually the earliest work is likely to be the best recording and it makes little reference to anything more divine about Christ other than being a Messiah. The other Gospels tend to change dramatically what St. Mark lays out and gives a much more divine and miracle driven Christ. Which is quite different from the Christ in St. Mark who is a healer, rabbi, prophet, and hints at being the Messiah.