• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Text-based Communication vs. Oral Communication

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Over the past 20-30 years, since the growth of the internet and text-messaging on phones, how has it impacted how people communicate with each other? Has it had any affect on how people view society?

I was thinking about this overall subject, especially when issues concerning the use and abuse of social media, "fake news," and the general sense of disconnectedness, echo chambers, and concerns over the escalating hostility and hatred in the overall culture.

It used to be that most communication was done by people talking to each other, either in person or over the phone. Many people would write letters, of course, although I was never much of a letter writer myself.

Political discussions would still occur, but among the ordinary people, it was face to face, most of the time. There were no forums or message boards or social media, so if you got into a political argument, it was in person.

People would typically get their news from newspapers and magazines, along with news on TV and radio, but there wasn't any way for the public to talk back or post any comments - unless they wanted to send in a letter to the editor (which I've done in the past, the only letter writing I ever really did). But then it would be up to the publication as to whether it gets printed. Anyone who was an outright hater, crackpot, conspiracy theorist or anyone else who might be seen as on the "lunatic fringe," their words would hardly ever see print - unless it's something they printed at home on a budget much lower than that of the New York Times. Or sometimes it might appear in the form of graffiti or on bathroom walls. (Actually, some of the bathroom walls at my school had long polemics on them, going back and forth, not unlike one would see on a message board.)

But now, what we used to write on bathroom walls is now plastered over the internet, available to countless millions of phones, tablets, and computers with access to social media. And people apparently eschew oral communication in favor of text communication.

Could that be a factor in people becoming meaner and nastier? Could that be why politics has become more and more vitriolic and ugly?
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Over the past 20-30 years, since the growth of the internet and text-messaging on phones, how has it impacted how people communicate with each other? Has it had any affect on how people view society?

I was thinking about this overall subject, especially when issues concerning the use and abuse of social media, "fake news," and the general sense of disconnectedness, echo chambers, and concerns over the escalating hostility and hatred in the overall culture.

It used to be that most communication was done by people talking to each other, either in person or over the phone. Many people would write letters, of course, although I was never much of a letter writer myself.

Political discussions would still occur, but among the ordinary people, it was face to face, most of the time. There were no forums or message boards or social media, so if you got into a political argument, it was in person.

People would typically get their news from newspapers and magazines, along with news on TV and radio, but there wasn't any way for the public to talk back or post any comments - unless they wanted to send in a letter to the editor (which I've done in the past, the only letter writing I ever really did). But then it would be up to the publication as to whether it gets printed. Anyone who was an outright hater, crackpot, conspiracy theorist or anyone else who might be seen as on the "lunatic fringe," their words would hardly ever see print - unless it's something they printed at home on a budget much lower than that of the New York Times. Or sometimes it might appear in the form of graffiti or on bathroom walls. (Actually, some of the bathroom walls at my school had long polemics on them, going back and forth, not unlike one would see on a message board.)

But now, what we used to write on bathroom walls is now plastered over the internet, available to countless millions of phones, tablets, and computers with access to social media. And people apparently eschew oral communication in favor of text communication.

Could that be a factor in people becoming meaner and nastier? Could that be why politics has become more and more vitriolic and ugly?

Yes.
 

PoetPhilosopher

Veteran Member
Over the past 20-30 years, since the growth of the internet and text-messaging on phones, how has it impacted how people communicate with each other? Has it had any affect on how people view society?

I was thinking about this overall subject, especially when issues concerning the use and abuse of social media, "fake news," and the general sense of disconnectedness, echo chambers, and concerns over the escalating hostility and hatred in the overall culture.

It used to be that most communication was done by people talking to each other, either in person or over the phone. Many people would write letters, of course, although I was never much of a letter writer myself.

Political discussions would still occur, but among the ordinary people, it was face to face, most of the time. There were no forums or message boards or social media, so if you got into a political argument, it was in person.

People would typically get their news from newspapers and magazines, along with news on TV and radio, but there wasn't any way for the public to talk back or post any comments - unless they wanted to send in a letter to the editor (which I've done in the past, the only letter writing I ever really did). But then it would be up to the publication as to whether it gets printed. Anyone who was an outright hater, crackpot, conspiracy theorist or anyone else who might be seen as on the "lunatic fringe," their words would hardly ever see print - unless it's something they printed at home on a budget much lower than that of the New York Times. Or sometimes it might appear in the form of graffiti or on bathroom walls. (Actually, some of the bathroom walls at my school had long polemics on them, going back and forth, not unlike one would see on a message board.)

But now, what we used to write on bathroom walls is now plastered over the internet, available to countless millions of phones, tablets, and computers with access to social media. And people apparently eschew oral communication in favor of text communication.

Could that be a factor in people becoming meaner and nastier? Could that be why politics has become more and more vitriolic and ugly?

Have people become meaner and nastier?
 

Viker

Your beloved eccentric Auntie Cristal
Bolder than the old days when people owned slaves and thought diplomacy was war?
No. Bolder now that they think they are hidden behind the insulated walls of the internet. 30-40 years ago conspiracy theorists were around but no one paid any attention to them, if most even knew. Now, they are mainstream thanks to the internet (and possibly the History Channel, lol). And millions more have been emboldened to follow in their shadow. The meaner was always there. Now it has an outlet and a growing new army, waiting to spill out into the streets.
 

amorphous_constellation

Well-Known Member
I've done both, but I don't know, I almost like the internet better, especially on a moderated forum. There was a time when I was on a board near the beginning of the century, and there was no moderation, and god were those people nasty. I think overall, it actually might be getting 'better' on the internet. But at the same time, I think that the disagreeing-type people, with obvious nastiness, still have some speech rights - because what they say can then be analyzed by the better speech operators and thinkers, who can deconstruct them with better ideas.

I've always held that good speech should be able to defeat bad speech in a debate. And I think it can, and that this is what proves its power.
 

Heyo

Veteran Member
Over the past 20-30 years, since the growth of the internet and text-messaging on phones, how has it impacted how people communicate with each other? Has it had any affect on how people view society?

I was thinking about this overall subject, especially when issues concerning the use and abuse of social media, "fake news," and the general sense of disconnectedness, echo chambers, and concerns over the escalating hostility and hatred in the overall culture.

It used to be that most communication was done by people talking to each other, either in person or over the phone. Many people would write letters, of course, although I was never much of a letter writer myself.

Political discussions would still occur, but among the ordinary people, it was face to face, most of the time. There were no forums or message boards or social media, so if you got into a political argument, it was in person.

People would typically get their news from newspapers and magazines, along with news on TV and radio, but there wasn't any way for the public to talk back or post any comments - unless they wanted to send in a letter to the editor (which I've done in the past, the only letter writing I ever really did). But then it would be up to the publication as to whether it gets printed. Anyone who was an outright hater, crackpot, conspiracy theorist or anyone else who might be seen as on the "lunatic fringe," their words would hardly ever see print - unless it's something they printed at home on a budget much lower than that of the New York Times. Or sometimes it might appear in the form of graffiti or on bathroom walls. (Actually, some of the bathroom walls at my school had long polemics on them, going back and forth, not unlike one would see on a message board.)

But now, what we used to write on bathroom walls is now plastered over the internet, available to countless millions of phones, tablets, and computers with access to social media. And people apparently eschew oral communication in favor of text communication.

Could that be a factor in people becoming meaner and nastier? Could that be why politics has become more and more vitriolic and ugly?
No.

While sometimes the communication via message boards is "meaner and nastier", it is because of the anonymity, not because it is written. I think the written form is less conducive to mean and nasty comments as it lets us think about what we want to say and how to say it. (OK, not everybody does the thinking part and you usually see it in the mistakes in spelling and grammar.)
I prefer writing in many cases because it lets me think, I don't get interrupted, I can easily add links to relevant sources when useful and there is a record.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Text based communication offers leisure.
Time to think...to research...to compose.
And personal prejudices are muted by
being physically invisible to others.
 
Top