Magical Wand
Active Member
I think our disagreement over the validity of induction is a real hurdle. If inductive thinking is valid, as you seem to believe it is, then I don't know how I could disagree with your conclusions. Rather than debating you, I'd be applauding you.
The only place induction was mentioned is in the quote by Paul Boghossian. My main arguments don't rely on induction, but rather on deduction (e.g., law of non-contradiction) and sense-perception. You failed to present any objection to that. I'm still waiting for a response.