• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The 2nd law of thermodynamics is not evidence of God

Magical Wand

Active Member
I think our disagreement over the validity of induction is a real hurdle. If inductive thinking is valid, as you seem to believe it is, then I don't know how I could disagree with your conclusions. Rather than debating you, I'd be applauding you.

The only place induction was mentioned is in the quote by Paul Boghossian. My main arguments don't rely on induction, but rather on deduction (e.g., law of non-contradiction) and sense-perception. You failed to present any objection to that. I'm still waiting for a response.
 

Brian2

Veteran Member
Shouting 'evidence is nice other wise all you have is guess' is also pretty cool

Has anyone any evidence for what time is?
We have reason and that tells me that the infinite extension of time into the past does not compute.
It could be a problem with the model of computer I am using of course.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Has anyone any evidence for what time is?
We have reason and that tells me that the infinite extension of time into the past does not compute.
It could be a problem with the model of computer I am using of course.


Not we, you. What is more real, we do not know
 
Top