• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Absolutism of Science

deeoracle

Member
Again, "science" is a misnomer. "The sciences" is more accurate, since scientific inquiry involves hundreds of thousands of different fields of study.

Besides, no. The sciences feed in on each other, sure, but at worst their purpose is the satisfaction of someone's geeky curiosity. Not generally a bad thing, because such satisfaction is pretty much what created the Information Age we're transitioning into now.

Most of the time, the sciences have specific goals of their own, but the general goal is pretty much the same among all of them: make life better.

Mske life better or make the experience of life uniformed
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
images

 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
perhaps with some form of philosophical materialism mitigated by a religion al about human dignity

Both philosophy and religion are highly subjective, so all you would be doing is opening up a can of worms. Science is much more objective, so I'd much rather see us going in that direction.
 

deeoracle

Member
Both philosophy and religion are highly subjective, so all you would be doing is opening up a can of worms. Science is much more objective, so I'd much rather see us going in that direction.


well we would have a subjective religion which is all about an objective experience- dignity and balance
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
perhaps because science it robotizing human experience

That would pretty much be up to the individual. If you don't want to be a "robot", then don't be a robot, maybe starting with social media like here. ;)
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
well we would have a subjective religion which is all about an objective experience- dignity and balance

Such as with my approach with naturalism-- ala Spinoza/Einstein? I don't think too many others will buy this though.
 

deeoracle

Member
i also meant that about the way we think- we will always find ways as humans to socialize- but it is the way we think and think of other which has become highly robotized
 

Kilgore Trout

Misanthropic Humanist
How much of Science is Absolute?
How much of it is only relevant to the scale of the studies from which it was gleaned?

If you don't know the answers to these questions, then you have no business making any arguments regarding science. Go back, finish your elementary science education, then come back with cogent queries.
 

Iti oj

Global warming is real and we need to act
Premium Member
well quantum physics is highly complex and like you said science provides tangible benefits

My question then is religion a type of science

Not at all. No predictive or explanatory models. Its also rigid and absolute.
 

Riverwolf

Amateur Rambler / Proud Ergi
Premium Member
Mske life better or make the experience of life uniformed

Make life better.

"Making the experience of life uniformed" is a goal of the fascism political philosophy, and is not at all an aspect of the sciences.

I agree, if we are truly an evolved species then its time for us to evolve-

An indication you don't understand how evolution works, though likely it comes from the misunderstanding that the media has of it.

We are not "more evolved" than any other form of life on this planet, contrary to what the media says. All species are evolved.
 
Last edited:
Top