The Art of War

[s13ep]

Suntzu was old nick I used in AnA ,I earned the right to have the nik, draw them in and hold with decisive counter , buy every second then steam roll , sometimes would look like I was loosing , was just saving my best for the right time , the counter would push them home was crushing defeat .
Overplayed that game if you know what I mean.
That was battlefield tactic , not art of all war , judge each enemy without commiting to early .
Art of war could be espionage & sabotage depend on situations .
War best avoided is true art of war , to compromise if can be done.

Interesting and relative to Sun Tzu's adaptation that's in front of me.

 

[s13ep]

The enemy are hidden behind obstacles, and are calling us names, not throwing stones.

Humiliate them, sure, but not too much, for then their name-calling will grow in vivacity.

Their weakness is heaven, that in their wake, heaven laughs.

 

[SpeaksForTheTrees]

Interesting and relative to Sun Tzu's adaptation that's in front of me.

Suntzu would of been good chess player is only so many moves an aggressor can make . I think he looks at it through eyes of when you really have no choice.

 

[SpeaksForTheTrees]

The enemy are hidden behind obstacles, and are calling us names, not throwing stones.

Humiliate them, sure, but not too much, for then their name-calling will grow in vivacity.

Their weakness is heaven, that in their wake, heaven laughs.

Yeah tell me about it some of the things folks would say about my mum when loosing in the chat box was ridiculous , stay focused and complete the task .

 

[SpeaksForTheTrees]

I've also nuked in war games , like really nuked then again to just make sure , over nuked backfired however they wanted to enslave my people a democracy with the highest standard of balanced human rights wasn't happening so fryed those fanatics . Ruined the eco of the world my plan backfired my people rotted felt really bad about it.

 

[SpeaksForTheTrees]

An interceptor type missile that communicates connects with the incoming warhead gently changing its direction forcing it through the outer atmosphere for detonation , star wars .

 

[SpeaksForTheTrees]

An interceptor type missile that communicates connects with the incoming warhead gently changing its direction forcing it through the outer atmosphere for detonation , star wars .

You know all the money being thrown at this project alone could feed the world , reality is educated folks brainwashed by bias wth primitive human values are dangerous .

 

[SpeaksForTheTrees]

I have ten years of social warring under my belt, and therefore I'm an experienced debater and judge. My true belief is that Earth should be preserved and sanctified by any means.

I have recently read the Art of War by Sun Tzu. It has influenced me to search for wise warrior-types; that does not include commoners or philosophers, but the hard to come by soldier-types.

Perhaps this search will fail under Heaven, but, I will continue militant environmental action- even by deception and wrathfulness- by any means.

My advantage is that the enemy does not know Heaven; I can say this plainly in front of the enemy and he is still unaware it's his weakness. I'm well prepared for attacks against me, and for attacks against the enemy; referring to debate- the warring duets of the social realm. There is then the grand war, that in time, I hope to be a part of- those who wish natures demise, versus, those who wish natures eternity.

If you consider yourself to be a warrior-type, who lives for nothing more than war, or in the social realm, debate- then it would be in your interests to bestow your trusts upon me as your wise warlord.

This thread is a discussion thread for the Art of War, Sun Tzu, and also a thread for warrior-types to join in arms. You may also ask me any questions as the resident warlord who created this thread.

- Shan Green

One simulation I managed to get my own spies to infiltrate the enemy to such extent that we detonated thier own nuclear asrenole of nuclear weapons on the ground in thier own cities.
Now that was poetry in art of war ))

 

[Shadow Wolf]

"By any means" is referring to social warring; "militant environmental action", referring to the activity of debate in the social realm, that, I hope, escalates further lawfully.

"By any means" means that you will win, and you will do whatever it takes to win. "Militant action" means just that, that you are using militant action, which includes combat, violence, sabotage, and terrorism.

Their weakness is heaven, that in their wake, heaven laughs.

Are you sure you even know what Heaven is?

reality is educated folks brainwashed by bias wth primitive human values are dangerous .

The issue is everyone has been "brain washed" into celebrating their own demise, to see the quick and convenient food that is killing them as a good choice, to think they need more material junk, and to be blind to the true costs of our ways of living.

 

[s13ep]

"By any means" means that you will win, and you will do whatever it takes to win. "Militant action" means just that, that you are using militant action, which includes combat, violence, sabotage, and terrorism.

Are you sure you even know what Heaven is?

The issue is everyone has been "brain washed" into celebrating their own demise, to see the quick and convenient food that is killing them as a good choice, to think they need more material junk, and to be blind to the true costs of our ways of living.

Define action.

 

[Skwim]

It should be in everyone's mind, by way of intelligence or any other means.

And in practical terms, such as tangible benefit, what is this supposed to accomplish?

 

[s13ep]

And in practical terms, such as tangible benefit, what is this supposed to accomplish?

A future for children.

 

[Skwim]

A future for children.

I'm assuming that without sanctification children would never make it into adulthood---they would die before they were 21 years old----so how does sanctification ensure they do survive whereas a lack of sanctification would not? OR there would be no future because the Earth was obliterated or became too toxic for human life, or . . . . . .?


.

 

[Ingledsva]

The world.
The correct collective term for yourself is "I ", especially if you're a warrior-type.

What? - I am referring to ALL of us in the forum that you posted this message to.

... If you consider yourself to be a warrior-type, who lives for nothing more than war, or in the social realm, debate- then it would be in your interests to bestow your trusts upon me as your wise warlord. ...

Why would any of us that consider ourselves warrior types, debaters, etc., bestow our trusts upon you as our wise warlord?

*

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Define action.

Do you really need it defined?

A future for children.

I'm not sure what to say. You claim by "any means" and "militant action," but when challenged you reveal that your approach to such things is lesser than what is understood. If you want a future for our children, don't focus on fighting the system from the outside, because our system is a heavily fortified one, one that both Sun Tzu and Machiavelli would agree it's just pointless, useless, and stupid to attack directly. You must infiltrate this system, work from within, and steer the entire system as it is in a different direction. This is were I stand apart from most of my fellow Communists, is that I support Socialist Democrats because they are the stepping stones towards what I view as a more just society. It is actually far from what I consider just, but even Bin Laden realized that not all wars can be won within a single life time. If you truly want to change the world, don't fight it by building a dam, put in the effort to redirect the river itself.
This struggle is not easy. It's so tainted and distorted that the very dye that is used for the "pro green" movement is actually one of the worst dyes for the environment. What can you ever hope to expect to achieve unless you infiltrate and make those who are already "within" help you to pick up the very river itself and move it towards another direction? Fighting is easy--changing things is not.

 

[s13ep]

Do you really need it defined?

I'm not sure what to say. You claim by "any means" and "militant action," but when challenged you reveal that your approach to such things is lesser than what is understood. If you want a future for our children, don't focus on fighting the system from the outside, because our system is a heavily fortified one, one that both Sun Tzu and Machiavelli would agree it's just pointless, useless, and stupid to attack directly. You must infiltrate this system, work from within, and steer the entire system as it is in a different direction. This is were I stand apart from most of my fellow Communists, is that I support Socialist Democrats because they are the stepping stones towards what I view as a more just society. It is actually far from what I consider just, but even Bin Laden realized that not all wars can be won within a single life time. If you truly want to change the world, don't fight it by building a dam, put in the effort to redirect the river itself.
This struggle is not easy. It's so tainted and distorted that the very dye that is used for the "pro green" movement is actually one of the worst dyes for the environment. What can you ever hope to expect to achieve unless you infiltrate and make those who are already "within" help you to pick up the very river itself and move it towards another direction? Fighting is easy--changing things is not.

I've already told you, in this case action is debate that may escalate lawfully.

It wouldn't be wise to escalate unlawfully.